Investigation the Impact of Business Strategy, Overvalued Equity on Stock Price Crash Risk
Subject Areas : Financial Knowledge of Securities AnalysisA. Heidarzadeh Hanzaee 1 , Gh. Hosseinzadeh Zorofchi 2
1 - Assistant Prof. Dr. , Department of Financial Management, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Iran
2 - M.Sc. student of Financial Management, Department of Financial Management, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran-Iran
Keywords: Business Strategy, Overvalued, Stock Price Crash Risk,
Abstract :
The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of business strategy and overvalued equity on stock price crash risk. Business strategy Following Bentley et al. (2014) research, the stock price crash risk has been measured following Houghton et al. (2014) and overvalued equity, following the model of Foods et al. (2005). Business strategy and overvalued as independent variables, the stock price crash risk as a dependent variable and firm size, company's age, financial leverage, market value to book value and return on assets as control variables. A total of 211 companies listed in the Tehran Securities Exchange have been selected in the Tehran Securities Exchange during the period of six years from 2012 to 2017 according to the society's screening conditions and 1266 company-year observations are included in the statistical analyzes. The research hypotheses have been tested using multivariate regression analysis using Panel data with fix effects. The results of the research show that business strategy and overvalued equity have a significant and positive effect on the crash risk. In fact, stocks of companies with a Prospector strategy are more exposed to the stock price crash risk compared to Defender Strategy companies. If firm size, company's age, financial leverage have a significant effect on the Stock Price Crash Risk, but the market value to book value and return on assets does not have a significant effect on the stock price crash risk.
* اسماعیل توکل نیا، 1392، بررسی ارتباط استراتژی تجاری و گزارشگری سرمایه انسانی با استفاده از روش گشتاورهای تعمیمیافته. فصلنامه پژوهش حسابداری. شماره 10، صفحه 128-109
* بهروز خدارحمی، حیدر فروغ نژاد، محمدجواد شریفی، علیرضا طالبی، 1395، تأثیر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر ریسک سقوط آتی قیمت سهام شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. مدیریت دارایی و تامین مالی. دوره 4، شماره 3، صفحه 58-39
* الهام روستایی دره میانه، زهرا دیانتی دیلمی، بهمن بنیمهد، 1394، رابطه بین استراتژی تجاری شرکت و سطح اجتناب مالیاتی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه پژوهشنامه مالیات (علمی-پژوهشی). سال 23، شماره 25.
* داریوش فروغی، منوچهر میرزایی، 1391، تاثیر محافظهکاری شرطی حسابداری بر ریسک سقوط آتی، پیشرفتهای حسابداری. دوره 4، شماره 2، صفحه 117-77
* مهدی مرادزاده فرد، مهدی ناظمی اردکانی، رضا غلامی، حجت‌اله فرزانی، 1388، بررسی رابطه بین مالکیت نهادی سهام و مدیریت سود در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه بررسیهای حسابداری و حسابرسی. دوره 16، شماره 2.
* محمود موسوی شیری، حسن خلعتبری و سید حسام وقفی، 1394، اثر عدم تقارن اطلاعاتی بر بیشارزشیابی سهام، پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی. سال سوم، شماره 73، صفحه 37.
* محمدحسین ودیعی نوقابی، امین رستمی، 1393، بررسی تأثیر نوع مالکیت نهادی بر ریسک سقوط آتی قیمت سهام در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی حسابداری مالی. سال 6، شماره 32، صفحه 66-43
* Ahsan Habib, Mostafa Monzur Hasan, 2017. Business strategy, overvalued equities, and stock price crash risk. Research in International Business and Finance. 39, 389–405
* Bentley, K.A., Omer, T.C., Sharp, N.Y., 2013. Business strategy, financial reporting irregularities, and audit effort. Contemp. Account. Res. 30 (2), 780–817.
* Chen, J., Hong, H., Stein, J.C., 2001. Forecasting crashes, trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. J. Financ. Econ. 61 (3), 345–381.
* Chi, J.D., Gupta, M., 2009. Overvaluation and earnings management. J.Bank. Finance 33 (9), 1652–1663.
* Hambrick, D.C., 1983. Some tests of the effectiveness and functional attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategic types. Acad. Manage. J. 26 (1), 5–26.
* Hong, Harrison, and Jeremy C Stein. 2003. “Differences of Opinion, Short-Sales Constraints and Market Crashes.” Review of Financial Studies 16 (summer): 487-525.
* Hutton, A.P., Marcus, A.J., Tehranian, H., 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. J. Financ. Econ. 94 (1), 67–86.
* Jensen, M., 2005. Agency costs of overvalued equity. Financ. Manage. 34, 5–19.
* Jeong-Bon Kim, Liandong Zhang, 2016. Accounting Conservatism and Stock Price Crash Risk: Firm-level Evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research. 33 (1), 412-441
* Jin, L., Myers, S.C., 2006. R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J. Financ. Econ. 79 (2), 257–292.
* Jin, L., Myers, S.C., 2006. R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J. Financ. Econ. 79 (2), 257–292.
* Kim, J.B., Li, Y., Zhang, L., 2011a. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: firm-level analysis. J. Financ. Econ. 100 (3), 639–662.
* Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
* Miles, R.E., Snow, C.C., 2003. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
* Robert E Houmes, Terrance R Skantz, 2010. Highly valued equity and discretionary accruals. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 37, 60-92
* Robert S. Chirinko & Huntley Schaller, 2007. "Fundamentals, Misvaluation, and Investment: The Real Story," CESifo Working Paper Series 1922, CESifo Group Munich.
* Rhodes, K.M., Robinson, D.T., Viswanathan, S., 2005. Valuation waves and merger activity, the empirical evidence. J. Financ. Econ. 77 (3), 561–603.
* Sara Soltanizadeh, Siti Zaleha Abdul Rasid, Nargess Mottaghi Golshan, Wan Khairuzzaman Wan Ismail, 2015, Business strategy, enterprise risk management and organizational performance. Management Research Review, 39(9)
* Shing-yang Hu, Yueh-hsiang Lin, Christine W. Lai, 2016, The Effect of Overvaluation on Investment and Accruals: The Role of Information. Journal of Empirical Finance, Forthcoming.
* Snow, C.C., Hambrick, D.C., 1980. Measuring organizational strategies: some theoretical and methodological problems. Acad. Manag. Rev. 5 (4), 527–538
_||_