Estimation of Environmental Pollutants Shadow Price Resulting from Fossil Fuel Use in Different Economical Sectors Case study: Tehran Province

Subject Areas : environmental management

Mir Hosein Mousavi ¹ , Narges Barzegar ² , Abbas Memarzade ³

1 - Assistant Professor , Faculty of Economy, University of Alzahra
2 - دانشجوی دکتری، رشته توسعه اقتصادی و برنامه ریزی ، دانشگاه الزهراء*(مسئول مکاتبات)
3 - Associate Professor, Environmental Faculty-University of Tehran

Received: 2013-07-25 Accepted : 2014-01-08 Published : 2014-12-22

Keywords: EPA coefficients, Externality, Environmental Pollutants, and fossil fuel,

Abstract :

AbstractIntroduction: The economical sectors, being a main consumer of fossil fuels, play a basic role in theEmission of environmental pollutants. In the process of giving service, these sectors createUndesirable outputs, in addition to desirable ones. The cost of this polluting behavior, and also thescarcity of appropriate analytical methods for the purpose of environmental policy making, someefforts have been made. In this paper, to estimate shadow price of environmental pollutants created byfossil fuel consumption in the economical sectors of Tehran province.Material & Methods: The used methodology in this paper is input-output analysis and EPAcoefficients.Results: Results show that economic sectors include transportation sectors to create23548850629RSL social cost , service 88533443280 RLS, agricultural 74716821840 RLS andindustry7269567240 RLS among economic sectors of Tehran have the most shadow prices of environmentalpollutants resulting from fossil fuel respectively.Discussion : Considering the global movement towards sustainable development, it is essential tonotice to the environmental destruction caused by different economical sectors. The results show thatmost of the social costs of air pollutants examined in this study due to the use of gas to the price of796 RLS per liter consumption in the transportation sector, and the lowest induced kerosene to cost196 RLS per liter is consumed.

References:

1. Krauss, M., Wilcke, W. and Zech, W.2000.Availability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) to earthworms in urban soils. Environmental Science and Technology,Vol.34,pp.4335-4340


2. Grathwohl, P., 1998. Diffusion in Natural Porous Media: Contaminant Transport, Sorption /Desorption and Dissolution Kinetics, Boston/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.


3. Kalbe,U.,Berger,W.,Eckardt ,J. and Simon ,F.,2008.Evaluation of leaching and extraction procedures for soil and waste",Waste management,Vol.28,pp.1027-1038


4. Oleszczuk,P. and Baran ,S.,2005.Leaching of Individual PAHs in Soil Varies with the Amounts of Sewage Sludge Applied and Total Organic Carbon Content. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies,Vol.14,pp.491-500


5. Baran S., Oleszczuk P. and Baranowska E., 2003.Degradation of soil environment in post flooding area. Content of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and striating herbicide. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B-Pesticides Food Contaminants and Agricultural Wastes, Vol.38, pp.783-796.


6. Zanst, K., 2008.Comparison of Leaching Tests for PAHs Contaminated Soils. MSc Thesis, Center for Applied Geosciences, University of Tubingen, Germany.


7. Grathwohl, P. & Van der Sloot, H., 2007. Groundwater risk assessment at contaminated sites (GRACOS):  test methods and modeling approaches. In Quevauviller, P. (ed.): Groundwater Science and Policy, pp. 291–315. RSC Publishing, Cambridge, UK.


8. Grathwohl, P. & Susset, B., 2009.Comparison of percolation to batch and sequential leaching tests: Theory and data. Waste Management, Vol .29, pp.2681–2688.


9. Enell, A., Reichenberg, F., Warfvinge, P.  & Ewald, G., 2004.A column method for determination of leaching of polycycling aromatic hydrocarbons from aged contaminated soil. Chemosphere, Vol. 54, pp.707–715.


10. Kan, A., Hunter, G., Chen, W., Ward, C. & Tomson, M. (1998) Irreversible sorption of neutral hydrocarbons to sediments:  experimental observations and model predictions.  Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 32, pp.892–902.


11. DIN."CEN/TS 14405, 2004. Characteristics of waste –leaching behavior tests-Up –flow percolation tests (under specified conditions), Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.


12. US EPA, 1986.Method 8310,Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons,United States Environmental Protection Agency.


13. Enell, A., Reichenberg, F., Warfvinge, p. And Ewald, G., 2004. A column method for determination of leaching of polycycling aromatic hydrocarbons from aged contaminated soil.Chemosphere, Vol. 54, pp.707-715.


14. Grathwhol, P.and Susset, B., 2009.Comparison of percolation to batch and sequential leaching tests: Theory and data", Waste Management, Vol.29, pp.2681-2688.


15. Zhang, Y., Zhu, S., Xiao, R., Wang, J. and Li, F., 2008.Vertical transport of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in different particle-size fraction of sandy soils", Environmental Geology, Vol.53, pp.1165-1172.


16. Roskam, G.D.and Comans, R.N., 2009.Availability and leaching of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: controlling processes and comparision testing methos.Waste Management, Vol. 29, pp.136-142.