Applying the DANP framework to Identify the effects of urban growth on national parks (case study; Bamo National Park - Shiraz city - Fars province)

Subject Areas : landuse

Fatemeh Pouryanezhad ¹ , Sayed Masoud Monavari ^{2 *} , MARYAM ROBATI ³ , Alireza Vafaeinejad ⁴ , Hossian Mohammadi ⁵

1 - Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Azad University, Science and Research Unit
2 - Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Assistant Professor, Faculty of Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
5 - Professor of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2023-05-15 Accepted : 2024-09-30 Published : 2025-11-17

Keywords: Growth of urban areas, Change User, DANP model, National Park.,

Abstract :

Background and objective: Today fast changes in land use and cover because of human activities makes serious problems and destructions on environment. The lack of correct location for the future physical growth of cities; has caused irreparable changes in different dimensions on the land system, including protected areas. The goal is to find suitable solutions to reduce the problems in the sanctuary and within the boundaries of Bamoo National Park.Research method: This research is practical and solves a problem in the real world. The collection of information in the field of survey research and statistical society is compiled with the opinion of enviornment experts and with a purposeful sampling method, based on the ranking and importance of variables in 4 physical/chemical environments- biological-social/cultural and economic environment has been done.Findings: First, the borders of the Bamoo National Park and the distance of 5 kilometers outside it were demarcated and mapped using the Google Earth Engine system. Then, by identifying the criteria and sub-criteria in 4 environments, using the Delphi method, the ranking of the indicators was determined and with the help of the DANP (ANP-DEMATEL) model, the influential factors in the region were determined.Discussion and conclusion: By criteria ranking, the economic environment is the first rank, and under the criteria, agriculture and horticulture development with a weight of 0.071, change of use and illegal occupation with a weight of 0.069, tourism and recreation with a weight of 0.068 and the increase in construction with a weight of 0.067 has been ranked 4.

References:

1. Mozaffaree‏ Pour,‏ Najmeh.,‏ Oja,‏ Tõnu.,‏ 2021.Urban‏ Expansion‏ Simulated‏ by‏ Integrated‏ Cellular‏ Automata‏ and‏ Agent-Based‏ Models;‏ An‏ Example‏ of‏ Tallinn,‏ Estonia.‏ Urban‏ Sci.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci5040085.1
2. He,‏ panelQingsong.,‏ Zeng,‏ Chen.,‏ Xie,‏ Peng.,‏ Tan,‏ Shukui.,‏ Wu,‏ Jiayu.,‏ 2019.‏ Comparison‏ of‏ urban‏ growth‏ patterns‏ and‏ changes‏ between‏ three‏ urban‏ agglomerations‏ in‏ China‏ and‏ three‏ metropolises‏ in‏ the‏ USA‏ from‏ 1995‏ to‏ 2015.‏ scs.‏ 50,101649.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.‏
3. Dadashpoor,‏ panelHashem.,‏ Azizi,‏ Parviz.,‏ Moghadasi,‏ Mahdis.,‏ 2018.‏ Land‏ use‏ change,‏ urbanization,‏ and‏ change‏ in‏ landscape‏ pattern‏ in‏ a‏ metropolitan‏ area.‏ scitotenv.655,‏ Pages‏ 707-719.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.‏
4. Zhou,‏ Liang.,‏ Dang,‏ Xuewei.,‏ Sun,‏ Qinke.,‏ Wang,‏ Shaohua.,‏ 2020.‏ Multi-scenario‏ simulation‏ of‏ urban‏ land‏ change‏ in‏ Shanghai‏ by‏ random‏ forest‏ and‏ CA-Markov‏ model.‏ journal‏ homepage:‏ www.elsevier.com/locate/scs.‏ ttps://doi.org/10‏ .1016/j.scs.2020.102045.‏
5. Chaudhuri,‏ Gargi.,‏ Clarke,‏ Keith‏ C.,‏ 2019.‏ Modeling‏ an‏ Indian‏ megalopolis–‏ A‏ case‏ study‏ on‏ adapting‏ SLEUTH‏ urban‏ growth‏ model.‏ Environment‏ and‏ Urban‏ Systems‏ 77-101358.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101358.
6. Tiitu,‏ M.,‏ 2018.‏ Expansion‏ of‏ the‏ built-up‏ areas‏ in‏ Finnish‏ city‏ regions–the‏ approach‏ of‏ travel-related‏ urban‏ zones.‏ Applied‏ Geography.101,1–13.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.10.001.Tobler,‏ W.‏ R.‏ (1979).‏ Cellular‏ geography.‏ In‏ S.‏ Gale,‏ &‏ G.‏ Olsson‏ (Eds.).‏ Philosophy‏ in‏ geography‏ (pp.‏ 379–386).‏ Netherlands:‏ Springer.
7. Wang,‏ X.,‏ Yang,‏ L.,‏ &‏ Ye,‏ Y.‏ (2019).‏ Contention‏ for‏ urban‏ state‏ space‏ and‏ the‏ rise‏ of‏ society‏ in‏ China:‏ A‏ case‏ study‏ of‏ “Housing‏ Planting”‏ in‏ Hohhot.‏ Cities,‏ 92,‏ 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.04.003.
8. Lepczyk,‏ A.‏ hristopher.,‏ Warren,‏ Paige‏ S.,‏ 2012.‏ Urban‏ Bird‏ Ecology‏ and‏ Conservation.‏ ‏ Studies‏ in‏ Avian‏ Biology‏ Copyright‏ Date:‏ 2012‏ University‏ of‏ California‏ Press.‏ Pages:‏ 344.‏ https://www.jstor.‏org/stable/10.1525/j.ctt1ppvkj‏ Search‏ for‏ reviews‏ of‏ this‏ book.
9. ‏ Pickett,‏ S.T.‏ and‏ M.L.‏ Cadenasso.,‏ 2009.‏ Altered‏ resources,‏ disturbance,‏ and‏ heterogeneity:‏ a‏ framework‏ for‏ comparing‏ urban‏ and‏ non-urban‏ soils.‏ Urba11‏ Ecosystems‏ 12(1):‏ 23-44.
10. Townsend,‏ Philip‏ A.,‏ Lookingbill,‏ Todd‏ R.,‏ Kingdon,‏ Clayton‏ C.,‏ Gardner,‏ Robert‏ H.,‏ 2009.‏ Spatial‏ pattern‏ analysis‏ for‏ monitoring‏ protected‏ areas.Remote‏ Sensing‏ of‏ Environment.Volume‏ 113,‏ Issue‏ 7,‏ Pages‏ 1410-1420.‏ https://doi.org/10.‏ 1016/j.rse.2008.05.023.
11. Yang,‏ Qiquan.,‏ Huang,‏ Xin.,‏ Tang,‏ Qiuhong.,‏ 2019.The‏ footprint‏ of‏ urban‏ heat‏ island‏ effect‏ in‏ 302‏ Chinese‏ cities:‏ Temporal‏ trends‏ and‏ associated‏ factors.‏ 655,‏ Pages‏ 652-662.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.171.
12. Chakraborty,‏ Saurav.,‏ Maity,‏ Indranil.,‏ Dadashpoor,‏ Hashem.,‏ Novotnẏ,‏ Josef.,‏ Banerji,‏ Suranjana., 2022.‏ Building‏ in‏ or‏ out?‏ Examining‏ urban‏ expansion‏ patterns‏ and‏ land‏ use‏ efficiency‏ across‏ the‏ global‏ sample‏ of‏ 466‏ cities‏ with‏ million+‏ inhabitants.‏ 120,‏ 102503.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102503.
13. Knapp,‏ Sonja.,‏ Aronson,‏ Mylaf.‏ J.,‏ Elacarpenter,‏ Adrianaherrera-Montes,‏ Kirstenjung,‏ D.,‏ Johankotze,‏ Frank‏ A.,‏ Lasorte,‏ Christopherh‏ A.,‏ Lepczyk,‏ Ianmacgregor-Forsa,‏ J.‏ Scott‏ Macivor,‏ marco‏ moretti,‏ Charles‏ H.‏ Nilon,‏ Maxr.‏ Piana,‏ Christine‏ C.,‏ Rega-Brodsky,‏ Allyson‏ Salisbury.,‏ Caragh‏ G.‏ Threlfall,‏ Christopher‏ trisos,‏ Nicholas‏ S.‏ G.‏ Williams,‏ and‏ Amy‏ K.‏ hahs.‏ 2022.‏ A‏ Research‏ Agenda‏ for‏ Urban‏ Biodiversity‏ in‏ the‏ Global‏ Extinction‏ Crisis.‏ Downloaded‏ from‏ https://academic.oup.com‏ /bioscience/article/‏ 71/3/‏ 268‏ /6009693‏ by‏ guest‏ on‏ 30‏ December.
14. Dinerstein,‏ T.E.,Vynne,‏ C.,‏ Sala,‏ E.,‏ Joshi,‏ A.R.,‏ Fernando,‏ S.,‏ Loejoy,T.E.,‏ Mayorga,‏ J.,‏ Olson,‏ D.,‏ Asner,G.P.,‏ Wikramanayake,‏ E.,‏ 2019.‏ A‏ Global‏ Deal‏ for‏ Nature:Guiding‏ principles,‏ milestones,‏ and‏ targets.‏ SCIENCE‏ ADVANCES.5,4.DOI:10.1126/sciadv.Aaw2869.‏
15. Shah,‏ Payal.,‏ Baylis,‏ Kathy.,‏ Busch,‏ Jonah.,‏ and‏ Engelmann,‏ Jens.,‏ 2021.What‏ determines‏ the‏ effectiveness‏ of‏ national‏ protected‏ area‏ networks?‏ LETTERS.This‏ content‏ was‏ downloaded‏ from‏ IP‏ address178.252.167.163.‏
16. ‏ Rafaai,‏ Nur‏ Hairunnisa.,‏ Abdullah,‏ Saiful‏ Arif.,‏ Hasan‏ Reza,‏ Muhammad‏ Imam.,‏ 2020.‏ Identifying‏ factors‏ and‏ predicting‏ the‏ future‏ land-use‏ change‏ of‏ protected‏ area‏ in‏ the‏ agricultural‏ landscape‏ of‏ Malaysian‏ peninsula‏ for‏ conservation‏ planning.‏ Remote‏ Sensing‏ Applications:‏ Society‏ and‏ Environment.‏ S2352-9385(19)30365-9.
17. Jiang,‏ Lei.,‏ Yu,‏ Le.,‏ 2019.‏ Analyzing‏ land‏ use‏ intensity‏ changes‏ within‏ and‏ outside‏ protected‏ areas‏ using‏ ESA‏ CCI-LC‏ datasets.‏ Global‏ Ecology‏ and‏ Conservation‏ 20‏ e00789.‏ journal‏ homepage:‏ http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco.
18. López-Angarita,‏ Tilley,‏ Alexander.,‏ Hawkins,‏ Julie‏ P.,‏ Pedraza,‏ Carlos.,‏ Roberts,‏ Callum‏ M.,‏ 2018.‏ Land‏ use‏ patterns‏ and‏ influences‏ of‏ protected‏ areas‏ on‏ mangroves‏ of‏ the‏ eastern‏ tropical‏ Pacific.‏ Volume‏ 227,Pages‏ 82-91.‏ https://doi.org/‏ 10.‏ 1016/j.biocon.2018.08.020.‏
19. Seiferling,‏ Ian.,‏ Proulx,‏ Raphael.,‏ Peres-neto,‏ Pedro‏ R.,‏ Fahrig,‏ Lenore.,‏ MESSIER,‏ CHRISTIAN.,‏ 2012.‏ Measuring‏ Protected-Area‏ Isolation‏ and‏ Correlations‏ of‏ Isolation‏ with‏ Land-Use‏ Intensity‏ and‏ Protection‏ Status.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01674.x.
20. Alo,‏ Clement‏ Aga.,‏ Pontius,‏ Robert‏ GilmoreJr.,‏ 2008.‏ Identifying‏ Systematic‏ Land-Cover‏ Transitions‏ Using‏ Remote‏ Sensing‏ and‏ GIS:The‏ Fate‏ of‏ Forests‏ inside‏ and‏ outside‏ Protected‏ Areas‏ of‏ Southwestern‏ Ghana.Volume‏ 35,‏ 2.‏ https://doi.org/10.1068/‏ b32091.
21. van‏ Asselen,‏ Sanneke.,Verburg,‏ Peter‏ H.,‏ 2013.‏ Land‏ cover‏ change‏ or‏ land-use‏ intensification:‏ simulating‏ land‏ system‏ change‏ with‏ a‏ global-scale‏ land‏ change‏ model.‏ ‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12331.
22. Mooney,‏ Harold‏ A.,one‏ Duraiappah,‏ Anantha‏ and‏ Larigauderie,‏ Anne.,‏ 2013.‏ Evolution‏ of‏ natural‏ and‏ social‏ science‏ interactions‏ in‏ global‏ change‏ research‏ programs.‏ supplement_1.‏ 3665-3672.‏ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.‏ 1107484110.
23. Ellis,‏ C.,‏ Goldewijk,‏ Kees‏ Klein.,‏ Siebert,‏ Stefan.,‏ Lightman,‏ Deborah.,‏ Ramankutty,‏ Navin.,‏ 2010.‏ Anthropogenic‏ transformation‏ of‏ the‏ biomes,‏ 1700‏ to‏ 2000.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00540.x
24. Taherdoost,‏ Hamed.,‏ Madanchian,‏ Mitra.,‏ 2023.‏ Multi-Criteria‏ Decision‏ Making‏ (MCDM)‏ Methods‏ and‏ Concepts.‏ Encyclopedia,‏ 3(1),77-87;‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/‏ encyclopedia‏ 3010006.
25. Hajduk,‏ Slawomiro.,‏ 2021.‏ Multi-Criteria‏ Analysis‏ of‏ Smart‏ Cities‏ on‏ the‏ Example‏ of‏ the‏ Polish‏ Cities.‏ MDPI.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/resources10050044.‏
26. Hsuan,‏ Min‏ Yang.,‏ Hung‏ Su,‏ Chiu.,‏ Cheng‏ Wang,‏ Wen.,2017.‏ The‏ Use‏ of‏ a‏ DANP‏ with‏ VIKOR‏ Approach‏ for‏ Establishing‏ the‏ Model‏ of‏ E-Learning‏ Service‏ Quality.‏ EURASIA‏ Journal‏ of‏ Mathematics‏ Science‏ and‏ Technology‏ Education.‏ ISSN:1305-8223.5927-5937‏ DOI:‏ 10.12973/eurasia.2017.01041a.
27. Darabi,‏ Sepida.,‏ Monavari,‏ Seyed‏ Masoud.,‏ Jozi,‏ Seyed‏ Ali.,‏ Rahimi,‏ Raziyeh,.Vafaeinejad,‏ Alireza.,‏ 2023.Visual‏ impact‏ assessment‏ of‏ renewable‏ energy‏ developments‏ with‏ the‏ application‏ of‏ multi_criteria‏ decision-making‏ method‏ ,‏ Environment,‏ Development‏ and‏ Sustainability‏ volume‏ 25,‏ pages4437–4451.‏ DOI:10.1007/s10668-022-02209-6.
28. Hsieh,‏ HN.,‏ Chen,‏ JF.,‏ Do,‏ QH.,‏ 2017.‏ A‏ creative‏ research‏ based‏ on‏ DANP‏ and‏ TRIZ‏ for‏ an‏ innovative‏ cover‏ shape‏ design‏ of‏ machine‏ tools.‏ Engineering‏ Design‏ 28(2):‏ 77-99.https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.‏ 2016.1272100.
29. Chiu,‏ WY.,Tzeng,‏ GH.,‏ Li,‏ HL.,‏ 2013.‏ A‏ new‏ hybrid‏ MCDM‏ model‏ combining‏ DANP‏ with‏ VIKOR‏ to‏ improve‏ e-store‏ business.‏ Knowledge-Based‏ Systems37:‏ 48-61.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.06.017.
30. Jamali,‏ Mohsen.,‏ Grannan,‏ Benjamin‏ L.,‏ Fedorenko,‏ Evelina.,‏ Saxe,‏ Rebecca.,‏ Báez-Mendoza,‏ Raymundo‏ &‏ Williams,‏ Ziv‏ M.,‏ 2021.‏ Single-neuronal‏ predictions‏ of‏ others’‏ beliefs‏ in‏ humans.‏ Nature‏ 591(7851):1-5.‏ DOI:10.1038/s41586-021-03184-0.
31. Garschagen,‏ Matthias.,‏ Wood,‏ Sylvia‏ L.R.,‏ Garard,‏ Jennifer‏ Ivanova,‏ Maria.‏ and‏ Luers,‏ Amy.,‏ 2020.‏ Too‏ Big‏ to‏ Ignore:‏ Global‏ Risk‏ Perception‏ Gaps‏ Between‏ Scientists‏ and‏ Business‏ Leaders.COMMENTARY.10.1029/2020‏ EF001498.
32. Norouzi,‏ Elmira.,‏ Ebrahim‏ pour,‏ Sharareh.,‏ Goshtasb,‏ Hamid.,‏ Jahani,‏ Ali.,‏ 2018.‏ Biodiversity‏ risk‏ zoning‏ in‏ Alborz‏ central‏ protected‏ area‏ in‏ the‏ southern‏ part‏ (under‏ the‏ management‏ of‏ Alborz‏ province)‏ using‏ DANP‏ technique.‏ Quarterly‏ scientific‏ journal‏ of‏ animal‏ environment‏ research.‏ (Persian)
33. Barber,‏ Christopher‏ P.,‏ Cochrane,‏ Mark‏ A.,‏ Souza‏ Jr,‏ Carlos‏ M.,‏ Laurance,William‏ F.,‏ 2014‏ .Roads,‏ deforestation,‏ and‏ the‏ mitigating‏ effect‏ of‏ protected‏ areas‏ in‏ the‏ Amazon.‏ Biological‏ Conservation‏ 177,‏ 203–209.‏ www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon.
34. Labianca,‏ Claudia.,‏ De‏ Gisi,‏ Sabino.,‏ Todaro,‏ Francesco.,‏ Notarnicola,‏ Michele.,‏ 2020.‏ DPSIR‏ Model‏ Applied‏ to‏ the‏ Remediation‏ of‏ Contaminated‏ Sites.‏ A‏ Case‏ Study:‏ Mar‏ Piccolo‏ of‏ Taranto.Sustainable‏ Environment‏ Research.‏ https://doi.org/10.1186/42834‏ -020-00054-8.
35. Rodr´guez-Rodr´ıguez,‏ David.,‏ Mart´ınez-Vega,‏ Javier.,‏ 2018.‏ Sustainable‏ Territorial‏ Management.‏ Environments,‏ ISSN‏ 2076-3298.‏ available‏ at:‏ http://www.mdpi.com‏ /journal‏ /environments/special‏ issues/sus‏ land.
36. Gallardo,‏ Marta.,‏ Martinez-Vega,‏ Javier.,‏ 2017.‏ Future‏ Land‏ Use‏ Change‏ Dynamics‏ in‏ Natural‏ Protected‏ Areas‏ -‏ Madrid‏ Region‏ Case‏ Study.370-377.DOI:10.5220/000638790‏ 3700377.
37. Scolozzi,‏ Rocco.,‏ Schirpke,‏ Uta.,‏ Morri,‏ Elisa.,‏ D'Amato,‏ Dalia.,‏ Santolini,‏ Riccardo.,‏ 2014.‏ Ecosystem‏ services-based‏ SWOT‏ analysis‏ of‏ protected‏ areas‏ for‏ conservation‏ strategies.Volume‏ 146,Pages‏ 543-551.https://doi.Org‏ /10.1016/‏ j.jenvman.2014.05.040.‏
38. Gigović,‏ L.,‏ Pamučar,‏ D.,‏ Božanić,‏ D.,‏ &‏ Ljubojević,‏ S.,‏ 2017.‏ Application‏ of‏ the‏ GIS-DANP-MABAC‏ multi-criteria‏ model‏ for‏ selecting‏ the‏ location‏ of‏ wind‏ farms:‏ A‏ case‏ study‏ of‏ Vojvodina,‏ Serbia.‏ Renewable‏ energy,103,‏ 501-521.
39. d'Amour,‏ Christopher‏ Bren.,‏ Reitsma,‏ Femke.,‏ Baiocchi,‏ Giovanni.,‏ Barthel,‏ Stephan.,‏ Güneralp,‏ Burak.,‏ Erb,‏ Karl-Heinz.,‏ Haberl,‏ Helmut.,‏ Creutzig,‏ Felix.,‏ Seto,‏ Karen‏ C.,‏ 2017‏ .Future‏ urban‏ land‏ expansion‏ and‏ implications‏ for‏ global‏ croplands.‏ Affiliations‏ expand.‏ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1606036114.
40. Gu,‏ Hongkai.,‏ 2022.‏ Simulating‏ Urban‏ Expansion‏ Dynamics‏ via‏ the‏ Cellular-Automata-based‏ SLEUTH‏ model:‏ A‏ Case‏ Study‏ in‏ Auckland‏ Metropolitan‏ Area.‏ A‏ thesis‏ submitted‏ in‏ fulfilment‏ of‏ the‏ requirements‏ for‏ the‏ degree‏ of‏ Master‏ of‏ Science‏ in‏ Geography,‏ The‏ University‏ of‏ Auckland.
41. Grimm,‏ Nancy‏ B.,‏ Foster,‏ David.,‏ Groffman,‏ Peter.,‏ Grove,‏ J‏ Morgan.,‏ Hopkinson,‏ Charles‏ S.,‏ Nadelhoffer,‏ Knute‏ J.,‏ Pataki,‏ Diane‏ E.,‏ Peters,‏ Debra‏ PC.,‏ 2008.‏ The‏ changing‏ landscape:‏ ecosystem‏ responses‏ to‏ urbanization‏ and‏ pollution‏ across‏ climatic‏ and‏ societal‏ gradients.‏ Connectivity‏ Review.https://doi.org/10.1890/070147.
42. Seto,‏ K.C.,‏ Fragkias,‏ M.,‏ Güneralp,‏ B.,‏ &‏ Reilly,‏ M.K.,‏ 2011.‏ A‏ meta-analysis‏ of‏ global‏ urban‏ land‏ expansion.‏ PLOS‏ ONE,‏ 6(8),‏ e23777.
43. Angel,‏ S.,‏ Parent,‏ J.,‏ Civco,‏ D.‏ L.,‏ Blei,‏ A.,‏ &‏ Potere,‏ D.,‏ 2011.‏ The‏ dimensions‏ of‏ global‏ urban‏ expansion:‏ Estimates‏ and‏ projections‏ for‏ all‏ countries,‏ 2000–2050.‏ Progress‏ in‏ Planning,‏ 75(2),‏ 53–107.
44. Simon,‏ David.,‏ Mcgregor,‏ Duncan.,‏ Kwasi,‏ Nsiah-Gyabaah,.‏ 2004.The‏ changing‏ urban-rural‏ interface‏ of‏ African‏ cities:‏ Definitional‏ issues‏ and‏ an‏ application‏ to‏ Kumasi,‏ Ghana.‏ Environment‏ and‏ Urbanization.DOI:10.1630/‏ 0956247042309856.
45. Aguilar,‏ Adrián‏ G.,Ward,‏ Peter‏ M.,‏ Sr,‏ C.B‏ Smith.,‏ 2003.Globalization,‏ regional‏ development,‏ and‏ mega-city‏ expansion‏ in‏ Latin‏ America:‏ Analyzing‏ Mexico‏ City’s‏ peri-urban‏ hinterland.Cities.Volume‏ 20,1,3-21.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-2751(02)000‏ 92-6.
46. Güneralp,‏ B.,‏ Seto,‏ K.C.,‏ 2013.‏ Futures‏ of‏ global‏ urban‏ expansion:‏ Uncertainties‏ and‏ implications‏ for‏ biodiversity‏ conservation.‏ Environmental‏ Res‏ Lett.‏ 014025.‏ DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/014025.
47. Kowarik,‏ Ingo.,‏ Fischer,‏ Leonie‏ K.,‏ Kendal,‏ Dave.,‏ 2020.‏ Biodiversity‏ Conservation‏ and‏ Sustainable‏ Urban‏ Development.‏ Sustainability4964;‏ doi:10.3390/su12124964.‏ www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability.
48. Bicknell,‏ E.,‏ Jake‏ Collins,‏ B.,‏ Murray.‏ Pickles,‏ Rob‏ S.A.‏ McCann,‏ Niall‏ P.‏ Bernard,‏ Curtis‏ R.‏ Fernandes,‏ Damian‏ J.‏ Miller,‏ Mark‏ G.R.‏ James,‏ Samantha‏ M.‏ Williams,‏ Aiesha‏ U.‏ Struebig,‏ Matthew‏ J.‏ Davies,‏ Zoe‏ G.‏ Smith,‏ Robert‏ J.‏ 2017.Designing‏ protected‏ area‏ networks‏ that‏ translate‏ international‏ conservation‏ commitments‏ into‏ national‏ action.‏ Biological‏ Conservation214-168–175.www.elsevier.com/‏ locate‏ /biocon.
49. Majnoonian,‏ Henrik.,2003.‏ National‏ parks‏ planning‏ guide.‏ Publication‏ No.‏ 17‏ of‏ the‏ Food‏ and‏ Agriculture‏ Organization‏ of‏ the‏ United‏ Nations.(FAo1989).(Persian)
50. Boom‏ Abad‏ Consulting‏ Engineers.,2008.‏ National‏ Park‏ management‏ plan‏ with‏ explanatory‏ steps‏ (planning)Department‏ of‏ ‏ Enviornment,‏ Office‏ of‏ habitats‏ and‏ regional‏ affairs.‏ Amendment‏ 2015.‏ (persian)
51. Bamoo‏ National‏ Park‏ environmental‏ experts.2019,‏ Birth‏ certificate‏ of‏ Bamoo‏ National‏ Park.‏ General‏ Department‏ of‏ Environmental‏ Protection‏ of‏ Fars‏ Province.‏ (Persian)
52. Saaty,‏ T.L.,‏ Takizawa,‏ M.,‏ 1986.‏ “Dependence‏ and‏ independence:‏ From‏ linear‏ hierarchies‏ to‏ nonlinear‏ networks”‏ European‏ Journal‏ of‏ Operational‏ Research,‏ 26,‏ 229–237.
53. Gabus,‏ A.‏ and‏ Fontela,‏ E.,‏ 1972.‏ World‏ Problems,‏ An‏ Invitation‏ to‏ Further‏ Thought‏ within‏ The‏ Framework‏ of‏ DEMATEL,‏ Battelle‏ Geneva‏ Research‏ Centre,‏ Geneva,‏ Switzerland,‏ 1972.
54. Si,‏ Sheng-Li.,Yue‏ You,‏ Xiao.,‏ Liu,‏ Hu-Chen.,‏ Zhang,‏ Ping.,‏ 2018.‏ DEMATEL‏ Technique:‏ A‏ Systematic‏ Review‏ of‏ the‏ State-of-the-Art‏ Literature‏ on‏ Methodologies‏ and‏ Applications.ID‏ 3696457.‏ https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457.‏
55. Ghobadi,‏ Morteza.‏ Nasria,‏ Manoochehr.‏ Ahmadiparib,‏ Masumeh.2021.‏ Land‏ suitability‏ assessment‏ (LSA)‏ for‏ aquaculture‏ site‏ selection‏ via‏ an‏ integrated‏ GIS-DANP‏ multi-criteria‏ method;‏ a‏ case‏ study‏ of‏ lorestan‏ province,‏ Iran.Aquaculture‏ 530.735776‏ .journal‏ homepage:‏ www.elsevier.com/locate/aquaculture.
56. Aliei,‏ M.,‏ Ghaderifar,‏ E.,‏ Hoorali,‏ M.,‏ &‏ Hamidi,‏ F.,‏ 2020.‏ Assessing‏ the‏ Interactions‏ of‏ third-‏ party‏ Logistics‏ enablers‏ with‏ the‏ DANP‏ hybrid‏ technique.‏ Interdisciplinary‏ Studies‏ in‏ the‏ Humanities,13(1),‏ 61-91.‏ Doi:‏ 10.22035/isih.
57. Rasouli,Reza.,‏ Mowgli,Alireza.,‏ Rashidi,‏ Mehdi.,‏ 2013.‏ Designing‏ a‏ model‏ to‏ strengthen‏ the‏ organizational‏ sustainability‏ of‏ basic‏ knowledge‏ workers,‏ using‏ the‏ Delphi‏ technique.Career‏ and‏ Organizational‏ Consulting‏ Quarterly.‏ Period‏ 6.‏ Number‏ 21.(Persian).
58. Elmqvist,‏ Thomas.,‏ Zipperer,‏ Wayne‏ C.,‏ and‏ Gii.neralp,‏ Burak.,2016.‏ URBANIZATION,‏ HABITAT‏ LOSS‏ AND‏ BIODIVERSITY‏ DECLINE.‏ Solution‏ pathways‏ to‏ break‏ the‏ cycle.Thomas‏ Elmqvist,‏ Wayne‏ Zipperer,Burak‏ Güneralp‏ Scientific‏ Journal‏ (JRNL).
59. Puppim‏ de‏ Oliveira,‏ J.A.0.,‏ Balaban,‏ C.N.H.,‏ Doll,‏ R.‏ Moreno-Pefiaranda,‏ A.‏ Gasparatos,‏ D.‏ lossifova‏ and‏ A.‏ Suwa.,‏ 2011.‏ Cities‏ and‏ biodiversity:‏ Perspectives‏ and‏ governance‏ challenges‏ for‏ implementing‏ the‏ convention‏ on‏ biological‏ diversity‏ (CBD)‏ at‏ the‏ city‏ level.‏ Biological‏ Conservation‏ 144(5):1302-1313.
60. Niemela.‏ 1999.‏ Ecology‏ and‏ urban‏ planning.‏ Biodiversity‏ a11d‏ Conservation‏ 8(1):‏ 119-131.
61. Pickett,‏ S.T.‏ and‏ M.L.‏ Cadenasso.,2009.‏ Altered‏ resources,‏ disturbance,‏ and‏ heterogeneity:‏ a‏ framework‏ for‏ comparing‏ urban‏ and‏ non-urban‏ soils.‏ Urba11‏ Ecosystems‏ 12(1):‏ 23-44.
62. Kobayashi,‏ Yuta‏ &‏ Okada,‏ Kei-Ichi‏ &‏ Mori,‏ Akira.,‏ 2019.‏ Reconsidering‏ biodiversity‏ hotspots‏ based‏ on‏ the‏ rate‏ of‏ historical‏ land-use‏ change.‏ Biological‏ Conservation.‏ 233.268-275.‏ 10.1016/j.
63. Simkin,‏ Rohan‏ D.,‏ Seto,‏ Karen‏ C.,‏ Robert‏ I.‏ McDonald,‏ and‏ Walter‏ Jetz.,‏ 2022.‏ Biodiversity‏ impacts‏ and‏ conservation‏ implications‏ of‏ urban‏ land‏ expansion‏ projected‏ to‏ 2050.‏ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2117297119.
64. Geschke,‏ S.A.,‏ James,‏ A.‏ F.,‏ Bennett,‏ D.G.‏ Nimmo.,‏ 2018.‏ Compact‏ cities‏ or‏ sprawling‏ suburbs?‏ Optimising‏ the‏ distribution‏ of‏ people‏ in‏ cities‏ to‏ maximise‏ species‏ diversity.‏ J.Appl.‏ Ecol.‏ 55,‏ 2320–2331.‏
65. Xu,‏ Jianchu.,‏ Melick‏ David‏ R.,‏ 2007.‏ Rethinking‏ the‏ Effectiveness‏ of‏ Public‏ Protected‏ Areas‏ in‏ Southwestern‏ China.Conservation‏ Biology.‏ https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00636.x.