Environmental Risk Assessment for Gas Pipeline Construction Using the Multi-Index Compilation Decision Method (Case study: Gachsaran to Bidboland)

Subject Areas : ارزیابی پی آمدهای محیط زیستی

shahab Ahmadzadeh ¹ , MARYAM ROBATI ² , hanieh nikoomaram ³

1 - M.Sc., Environmental Natural Resources Engineering, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.* (Corresponding Author)
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of HSE, Faculty of Natural Resource and Environment, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2018-09-02 Accepted : 2019-01-30 Published : 2020-10-22

Keywords: assessment, Vikor, Envid, Gas pipelines, Environmental Risk,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: This study analyzes the risk assessment of Gachsaran petrochemical Ethan transformation 20 inch pipeline implementation design as one of the most important petrochemical designs of the country, with the knowledge of assuring necessity of proper and right implementation of projects and finally presenting solutions for adverse effects reduction on environment. Method:  VIKOR and ENVID methods are types of environmental risk identification methods that show necessary applicability for projects’ risk amount assessment. Findings: In this research, relative analysis process of failure existence potentials is discussed and also sensitivity assessment and vulnerability detection of environment around us is done. This method conclude recognition of environment affected by gas leakage, important ecologic compartments checked and assessed considering environmental sensitivities, risk amount guaranty according to existing standards and identification of preventive actions and potential pipeline risk reduction actions. Discussion and Conclusions: The results show that in both mentioned methods, construction phase has more risk in comparison to application phase as in construction phase, physical and chemical and economical, social and cultural environments respectively get the most influence and in application phase with less severity comparing to construction phase Economical, social and cultural and physical and chemical receive the most influence.

References:

1. Jozi, S.A., and Irankhahi, M. 2010. Environmental risk assessment of gas pipelines by Compiled AHP Method, Journal of Ecology science (JES). 36(53), 107-120. (In Persian)


2. Izadi, Ali., and Chavoshian, A. 2014. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of the risks of oil pipelines (National Iranian Oil Engineering and Construction), Journal of scientific advancement of new process. 10(52), 200-209. (In Persian)


3. Vakilazad, Gh., and Poursotoudeh, N. 2017. Environmental risk assessment methods in oil and gas transmission projects, Journal of Oil, Gas and Energy. 42, 12-20. (In Persian)


4. Daneshshakib, M., and Fazli, S. 2008. Separation of successful and unsuccessful companies using a hybrid approach (FAHP – TOPSIS) in Tehran Stock Exchange, Iranian journal of management sciences.4 (15), 87-117. (In Persian)


5. Adelazar, M., and Memariani, A. 1995. AHP a New Technique for Group Decision Making, Iranian journal of Management knowledge. No. 27-28, 22-32. (In Persian)


6. Habibi, A., Izadyar, S., and Sarafrazi, A. Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making, Gil's Inscription Publishing; 2014


7. Ebrahimzadeh Pezeshki, R., Saeida Ardakani, S., Tabatabayi Nasab, S.M., Jalilian, N., and Noori, A. 2014. An Analysis of EQ by Combining Two Approaches of AHP and VIKOR at Fuzzy Environment (Case Study: Faculties of Yazd University), journal of Higher Education. 7(27), 115-139. (In Persian)


8. Brito, A.J., and de Almeida, A.T. 2008. Multi attribute risk assessment for risk ranking of natural gas pipelines. Reliability engineering & System safety; 2008.p. 187-198.


9. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. 2004. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparativeanalysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS, European. Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445-455.


10. Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. 2007. Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outrankingmethods. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(2), 514-529.


11. EPA Guidline for Ecological Risk Assessment/630/R-95/002F


12. Foster.  Wheeler. 2001. Risk assessment by AHP Method With reference to potential expect for risk.