The Investigation of the relationship between groundwater level variation and drought index (Case study: Sharifabad Watershed in Qom Province)

Subject Areas : Water and Environment

Elham Forootan ¹ (Assistant ‌Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran *(Corresponding Author))
Fatemeh Golpayegani ² (M.Sc., Watershed Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2017-07-28 Accepted : 2018-02-14 Published : 2020-07-22

Keywords: Kriging, SWI index, Groundwater, Sharifabad, SPI index,

Abstract :

Background and objective: The climate change phenomenon affects water storage in aquifers through changes in rainfall volume. In this study, the aim is to estimate the average groundwater level using the most appropriate geostatistical method and then investigate the relationship between groundwater index and one of the drought indices on monthly and annual scale in order to specify the importance of rainfall in groundwater recharge. Method: The watershed of this study was Sharifabad watershed located in Qom province with an aquifer area of ​​ 27035/2 hectares. There are 16 observation wells in this area. In this study, during the period of 1384-1384, the water level of observation wells in the area was investigated using variogram models. The average water level was determined using the best model per year, then the SWI index at the watershed was calculated. The SPI index, one of the drought indicators, was also used to investigate precipitation variation and then, using Pearson coefficient, the correlation of these indices was investigated on monthly and annual scale. Findings: The results showed that among the variogram models that were used to interpolate the monthly water level data, Kriging model is the most appropriate. Also, Pearson correlation coefficient between SWI and SPI indicators is not significant on monthly basis at confidence level of 99% in both observations of Mozafarabad and Alborz. Moreover; this correlation coefficient on the annual scale is not meaningful either. Discussion and Conclusion: In this study, the insignificance relationship between SPI and groundwater index in the study area indicates that precipitation has a small proportion in groundwater recharge in the water balance of these areas on monthly and annual scale. Therefore, it can be concluded that the most part of rainfall is out of reach due to excessive evapotranspiration and is not able to recharge the aquifer  in the region.

References:

1. Think tank of Iran Water, knowing ground water resources, Kerman Chamber of commerce, industry and agriculture,1391.37 pp.(In Persian)


2. Darand,Mohammad.,Assessment and Detection of Climate Change in Iran During Recent Decades, , Journal of Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering. 2015,  Vol. 9, No. 30,1-14 pp .(In Persian)


3. Delbari,Masoomeh., et al, the investigation of spatial –temporal variation and zoning of water level in Koohpaye-segzi aquifer(Isfahan province) using geo-statistical methods, Journal of geographicl spacing of Ahar Islamic Azad University, . Vol. 15, No. 52, winter 2015, 305-324pp.(In Persian)


4. Karami,Fariba, Evaluation of the relation between drought and water level decline in Tabriz plain, Journal of geography and planning(Tabriz University) 2009.Vol.16.No.37.111-131pp.(In Persian)


5. Zeinali, Batool et al, Investigate the Effect Meteorological and Hydrological Drought on Groundwater Quantity and Quality (Case Study: Marand Plain), Journal of Watershed Management Research 2016.Vol. 7, No. 14, 177-187pp.(In Persian)


6. Maleki nejhad, H. and M. Soleymani Motlagh. 2011. Assessing the Severity of Climatic and Hydrologic Droughts in Chaghalvandi Basin, Journal of Iran Water Research, 5: 61-72pp (In Persian).


7. Moghimi,Shokat,Babaeei Fini,Omolsalameh, the relationship of drought and water quality in Abhar plain using SPI and Schuller, Piper  and Wilcox diagrams, Journal of Geography (regional planning), 2016,Vol7,Nov 3, 103-116pp. (In Persian)


8. Vicente-Serrano,S.M and LOPEZ-Moreno,J.I., 2005. Hydrological response to different time scales of climatological drought: an evaluation of standardized precipitation index in a mountainous Mediterranean basin, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions,No 2,pp.1221-1246


9. Keery, J., Binley, A., Crook, N., Smith, J.W.N .,2007. Temporal and Spatail Variability of Groundwater Surface water Fluxes, Journal of Hydrology, 336, pp.1-16.


10. Bhuiyan C., R.P. Singh and F.N. Kkogan. 2006. Monitoring Drought Dynamics in the Aravalli Region (India) Using Different Indices Based on Ground and Remote Sensing Data, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geo Information, 8,pp. 289-302.


11. Holz, G.K .,2009. Estimation of Regional Meteorological and Hydrological Drought Characteristics: A Case Study for Denmark, Journal of Hydrology, 281, pp.230-247.


12. Qom Regional Water Company, groundwater data,2016. (In Persian)


13. Data, P.S., D.L. Deb and S.K. Tygi. 1997. Assessment of groundwater contamination from fertilizers in the Delhi area based on O18, No3 and K composition. Micro chemical Journal, 64, pp. 112-120.


14. Hassani Pak, A. 2010. Geostatistics (3rd edition), Tehran University Press, 314 pp. (In Persian)


15. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J. 1993.The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society: Boston, pp. 179–184.


16. Barca , E.Passarella, G.,2008. Spatial evaluation of the risk of groundwater quality degradation. A comparison between disjunctive kriging and geostatistical simulation, Environ Monit Assess 137,pp.261–273: DOI 10.1007/s10661-007-9758-3


17. Peters, E., van Lanen, H. A. J., Torfs, P. J. J. F., and Bier, G. 2005. Drought in groundwater-drought distribution and performance indicators, J. Hydrol., 306,pp 302–317.


18. Kumar,C.P.2015.Ground water assessment  and modelling, sara book publication, India , PP 332.


19. Moghimi, Homayoon, Applied Hydrology,  first edition, PayameNoor university publication,2012. (In Persian)