• Home
  • Attitude of High School Students to the Importance and Preservation of Natural Resources (Case Study: Khorramabad City, Iran)

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : JEST-1607-2869 (R1) Visit : 193 Page: 257 - 270

10.22034/jest.2018.19810.2869

Article Type: Original Research

Attitude of High School Students to the Importance and Preservation of Natural Resources (Case Study: Khorramabad City, Iran)

Subject Areas : natural resorces

Shahram Mehdi Karami 1 , Mohean Rajabi 2 , Akram Azadi Rimeleh 3 , Akram Ahmadi 4

1 - Ph.D. Student, Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Lorestan, Iran *(Corresponding author).
2 - Graduate student assessment of environmental pollution, Payam Noor University, Tehran.
3 - - Ph.D. Student, Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Lorestan.
4 - Assistant Prof. Research Division of Natural Resources, Golestan. Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Gorgan, Iran

Received: 2016-07-29 Accepted : 2017-03-01 Published : 2019-08-23

Keywords: urban – rural area, Natural Resources, Training influence, khorramabad,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: in the recent years, natural resource's degradation in the Lorestan province has been alarming. Therefore, assessment of students' knowledge to natural resources is essential as future users of natural resources. Methods: To conduct the study a questionnaire was designed regarding to the professors and experts comments. Validity and reliability was calculated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient that the 0.75 represents acceptable reliability. Then, among 800 individuals of students, from 10 schools of Khorramabad city who were trained as oral, poster installation and educational films, 250 individuals were selected to fulfill questionnaire and to investigate their view before and after education. Findings: The descriptive results of educational level, father's job, mothers and father's education, household income and the time of television watching on the attitudes of students towards natural resources were presented. Inferential results also showed the following results: i) significant and positive correlation between the variables of knowledge, recognition, attitudes and environmental behavior with education, ii) significant and positive correlation between environmental behavior and environmental knowledge, iii) significant and positive linear relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental behavior of students. Moreover data analysis demonstrated that chi-squared and binomial test confirmed the positive effect of training on increasing recognition and promotion of Natural Resources. Discussion and Conclusion:  Education as the most available and efficient tool can have an important and critical role in promoting attitude and recognition of students toward natural resources and preserving national capital.

References:


  1. Ramazani Ghavamabadi, M., 2013. Strategic Review of Environmental protection training in Iran. Strategy Journal, Vol. XXI, NO. 65, pp. 233-257.
    2.
  2. Bagheri Varkaneh, A., 2004. Evaluation of awareness and interest among high school students in Tehran on Environmental Protection Master's thesis Agricultural Extension and Education, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.
    3.
  3. Meibodi, H. 2014. Is the kind of school elementary students environmental awareness makes a difference? Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 11-19.
    4.
  4. Navah, A.R. Kia, SH., Porter CaronI, M., 2012. The relationship between religiosity with environmental values and behaviors of citizens (Case study Ahvaz). Urban sociological studies. Pp. 77-98.
    5.

  1. Arcury, T. A., 1990. Environmental Attitude and Environmental Knowledge. Society for Applied Anthropology. Vol. 49, pp 300-304.

    1. Manzanal, R.F., Barreiro L.R., Carrasquer J., 2007. Evaluation of Environmental Attitudes: Analysis anResults of a Scale Applied to University Student. Science Education. Vol. 91, No. 6, pp 988-1009.        
      2.

  2. Mahmoudi, H., Vessey, H., 2006. Promote environmental education principles approach in environmental protection. Environmental sciences. Vol. 8, pp 57-6.
    3.

  1. Pirnia, M., 1992. Itinerary Empress, Iran's Mehr Publications, Paris, 275 p.
    2.
  2. Mehdi Karami, SH., Heydari Chegeni, D., Salehi Chegeni, M., Rajabi, M., Abrari Vajary, K., 2013. The most important factors in the destruction of the central Zagros forests (province) and management practices of the first Congress of agriculture and sustainable natural resources. pp 1-8.
    3.
  3. Farahmand, M., Shokouhifar, K., Sayarkhalaj, H., 2015. Social Factors influencing environmental behavior (Case Study: Yazd City). Sociological studies of urban, Vol. 4, No. 10, pp 109 – 141.
    4.
  4. Salehi, S., Ghaemiasl, Z., 2013. Examine the relationship between environmental education and environmental protection behaviors. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, PNU, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 67-79.
    5.
  5. Arbuthnot, J., Lingg, S., 2007. A Comparison of French and American Environmental Behaviors, Knowledge, and Attitudes. International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 10, Issue 4.
    6.
  6. Cochran, W. G., 1977. Sampling techniques (3rd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    7.
  7. Quimbita, G.H., Pavel, M., 2005. Assessing On Environmental Attitude Development Model: Factor Influencing the Environmental Attitude of College Student.
    8.
  8. Molina, M.A., Fernández-Sáinz, A., Izagirre-Olaizola, J. 2013. Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behavior: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 61, pp 130-138.
    9.
  9. Dunlap Riley, E. 1978. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm; A revised NEP scale- statistical data include. Journal of social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, 425-442.
    10.
  10. Watson, K.H.C., 2005. Environmental Concern in a local Context; The Significance of Place Attachment.  Environmental and Behavior, Vol., No. 332, pp. 249-263.
    11.
  11. Shobeiri, M. Sarmadi, M.R., Sharifian, S., 2008. Needs assessments and determine priorities for students and teachers in schools in the field of environmental education.  Journal of environmental science and technology, Vol. 4, pp. 150-143.
    12.
  12. Sang-Joon, N., 1995. Environmental education in primary and secondary schools in Korea: Current developments and future agendas. Retrieved from http://www.informa world.com/
    13.
  13. Kara, K., 2004. Mass media and environmental knowledge of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Journal the Environmentalist, Vol. 19, pp. 85-97.
    14.
  14. Asgari, A. 2011. Environmental Islam. Publisher: Islamic Research Center of IRIB.
    15.
  15. Yousefvand Mofrad, M., Gholamrezayee, S., 2014. The impact of education on middle school students' attitudes toward the natural resources sector Bastam city dynasty. Page 35.
    16.
  16. Shariyatzadeh, M, Pezeshkirad, G., Sedighi, H., 2012. Investigate the role of promoting participatory management of natural resources in the improvement of pastures Semnan, forest and rangeland numbers. Vol. 90, No. 91, pp. 36 -42.
    17.

 

 

_||_

  1. Ramazani Ghavamabadi, M., 2013. Strategic Review of Environmental protection training in Iran. Strategy Journal, Vol. XXI, NO. 65, pp. 233-257.
    2.
  2. Bagheri Varkaneh, A., 2004. Evaluation of awareness and interest among high school students in Tehran on Environmental Protection Master's thesis Agricultural Extension and Education, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch of Tehran.
    3.
  3. Meibodi, H. 2014. Is the kind of school elementary students environmental awareness makes a difference? Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 11-19.
    4.
  4. Navah, A.R. Kia, SH., Porter CaronI, M., 2012. The relationship between religiosity with environmental values and behaviors of citizens (Case study Ahvaz). Urban sociological studies. Pp. 77-98.
    5.

  1. Arcury, T. A., 1990. Environmental Attitude and Environmental Knowledge. Society for Applied Anthropology. Vol. 49, pp 300-304.

    1. Manzanal, R.F., Barreiro L.R., Carrasquer J., 2007. Evaluation of Environmental Attitudes: Analysis anResults of a Scale Applied to University Student. Science Education. Vol. 91, No. 6, pp 988-1009.        
      2.

  2. Mahmoudi, H., Vessey, H., 2006. Promote environmental education principles approach in environmental protection. Environmental sciences. Vol. 8, pp 57-6.
    3.

  1. Pirnia, M., 1992. Itinerary Empress, Iran's Mehr Publications, Paris, 275 p.
    2.
  2. Mehdi Karami, SH., Heydari Chegeni, D., Salehi Chegeni, M., Rajabi, M., Abrari Vajary, K., 2013. The most important factors in the destruction of the central Zagros forests (province) and management practices of the first Congress of agriculture and sustainable natural resources. pp 1-8.
    3.
  3. Farahmand, M., Shokouhifar, K., Sayarkhalaj, H., 2015. Social Factors influencing environmental behavior (Case Study: Yazd City). Sociological studies of urban, Vol. 4, No. 10, pp 109 – 141.
    4.
  4. Salehi, S., Ghaemiasl, Z., 2013. Examine the relationship between environmental education and environmental protection behaviors. Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development, PNU, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp 67-79.
    5.
  5. Arbuthnot, J., Lingg, S., 2007. A Comparison of French and American Environmental Behaviors, Knowledge, and Attitudes. International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 10, Issue 4.
    6.
  6. Cochran, W. G., 1977. Sampling techniques (3rd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    7.
  7. Quimbita, G.H., Pavel, M., 2005. Assessing On Environmental Attitude Development Model: Factor Influencing the Environmental Attitude of College Student.
    8.
  8. Molina, M.A., Fernández-Sáinz, A., Izagirre-Olaizola, J. 2013. Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behavior: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 61, pp 130-138.
    9.
  9. Dunlap Riley, E. 1978. Measuring endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm; A revised NEP scale- statistical data include. Journal of social Issues, Vol. 56, No. 3, 425-442.
    10.
  10. Watson, K.H.C., 2005. Environmental Concern in a local Context; The Significance of Place Attachment.  Environmental and Behavior, Vol., No. 332, pp. 249-263.
    11.
  11. Shobeiri, M. Sarmadi, M.R., Sharifian, S., 2008. Needs assessments and determine priorities for students and teachers in schools in the field of environmental education.  Journal of environmental science and technology, Vol. 4, pp. 150-143.
    12.
  12. Sang-Joon, N., 1995. Environmental education in primary and secondary schools in Korea: Current developments and future agendas. Retrieved from http://www.informa world.com/
    13.
  13. Kara, K., 2004. Mass media and environmental knowledge of secondary school students in Hong Kong. Journal the Environmentalist, Vol. 19, pp. 85-97.
    14.
  14. Asgari, A. 2011. Environmental Islam. Publisher: Islamic Research Center of IRIB.
    15.
  15. Yousefvand Mofrad, M., Gholamrezayee, S., 2014. The impact of education on middle school students' attitudes toward the natural resources sector Bastam city dynasty. Page 35.
    16.
  16. Shariyatzadeh, M, Pezeshkirad, G., Sedighi, H., 2012. Investigate the role of promoting participatory management of natural resources in the improvement of pastures Semnan, forest and rangeland numbers. Vol. 90, No. 91, pp. 36 -42.
    17.

 

 

Related articles

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]