Investigating the relationship between innovation ability, type of innovation and performance of the companies that are accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange
Subject Areas : Bi-quarterly Journal of development economics and planninghassan sadi 1 , SAEED Daei-Karimzadeh 2 * , Akbar Etebarian 3
1 - PhD student in public administration, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3 - Professor Islamic Azad University, Department of Management, Isfahan.
Keywords: innovation, performance, Tehran Stock Exchange, manufacturing companies,
Abstract :
The purpose of this research is Investigating the relationship between innovation ability, type of innovation (Organizational, product, process and marketing) and performance (innovative, market, production and financial) of the companies that are accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical population of the research consists of 422 manufacturing companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, which is selected as the selected sample using the systematic elimination method of 52 companies. The method of collecting field data and data collection tool is a revised standard questionnaire whose content validity was evaluated by experts and the validity of structure and structure was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis in smart-pls software and its reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient. 0.927 was approved Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to test normality and path analysis and structural equation modeling were used to estimate the pattern. The results showed that innovation and its types have a significant effect on the organization's performance from different aspects. The results also showed that innovation ability has the most impact on organizational innovation and innovation performance. It has the greatest impact on marketing innovation. Based on the results of this study, innovation performance to play an important role in increasing the market performance level both directly and through product performance. Also, organizational innovation has a direct impact on product innovation and can also affect product innovation through process innovation
• رشیدی, محسن, عبدی, مصطفی, و صومی, مائده. (1403). بررسی تاثیر شدت رقابت و اندوخته سازمانی بر رابطه بین نوآوری و عملکرد شرکت. مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی. 5(1), 18-33
• پرتوی, سارا. (1402). اثر نوآوری و برنامه‌ریزی راهبردی بر عملکرد سازمان‌ها: مورد مطالعه بیمارستان‌های بخش خصوصی و دولتی. مدیریت نوآوری و راهبردهای عملیاتی 4(4), 387-400.
• محمدرضا اقبال، سید علی نبوی چاشمی، ناصر یدالله زاده طبری. 1402. بررسی عوامل موثر بر عملکرد شرکت های اکتساب کننده پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دانش سرمایه گذاری 45. 115-131.
• حسین وظیفه دوست، سارا صوری. 1398. بررسی نقش انواع نوآوری در تاثیر نوآوری سازمانی و توانایی نوآوری بر عملکرد بازار(مطالعه موردی : شرکت های تولیدی خدماتی یک شهرک صنعتی ). چهارمین کنفرانس ملی در مدیریت،حسابداری و اقتصاد با تاکید بر بازاریابی منطقه ای و جهانی
• مهدی مرتضوی، مهدی رسولی قهرودی، آرزو رستمی. 1395. بررسی تاثیر نوآوری سازمانی و استراتژی عمومی رهبری هزینه بر عملکرد سازمان از طریق مزیت رقابتی. مدیریت توسعه و تحول . 17.
• روح الله بیات، سپیده محمدنژاد مدردی. 1395. بررسی تاثیر نوآوری های سبز بر عملکرد زیست محیطی و مزیت رقابتی سازمان. کنفرانس جهانی مدیریت، اقتصاد حسابداری و علوم انسانی در آغاز هزاره سوم
• نیما گروسی مختار زاده، محمود زمانی. 1394. تبیین تاثیر بازارگرایی و نوآوری مدیریت بر عملکرد بنگاه با تاکید بر نقش میانجی نوآوری فناورانه. مدیریت بازرگانی 24. 463-484.
• نیک رفتار طی، طالبی ک، سعیدی ف. 1394. بررسي رابطة نوآوري سازماني و عملكرد با متغير ميانجي نوآوري بازاريابي (مطالعة موردي: كسب وكارهاي كوچك و متوسط در صنعت نساجي كاشان) ، مدیریت بازرگانی، دوره 7، شماره 2، صص 485-5000.
• حاجی حسینی ح ا، نورزاد مقد ا. 1393. تاثیر نوآوری و بازارگرایی بر عملکرد کسب و کار و مزیت رقابتی پایدار در بنگاه های صنعتی ، دو فصلنامه تکنولوژی صنعتی ،تهران،دانشکده علوم و فنون نوین دانشگاه تهران ، صص 21-29.
• محمد رضا صادقی مقدم*، محمود زمانی، محمد گشتاسبی، یاسر شجاعی. . بررسی عملکرد نوآوری محصول جدید در شرکتهای تولید کننده قطعات خودرو در ایران: یک مطالعه علی. مدیریت توسعه فناوری . 123-150.
• Hoseini Rad, S. D., Ghasemi, M., & Mohseni, A. (2023). Presenting a Model for the Role of Disclosure Quality in the Relationship between Innovation and Financial Performance. Journal of System Management, 9(1), 67-78.
• West, M. A., & Sacramento, C. A. (2023). Creativity and innovation: The role of team and organizational climate. In Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 317-337). Academic Press.
• Banmairuroy, W., Kritjaroen, T., & Homsombat, W. (2022). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors: Evidence from Thailand’s new S-curve industries. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(3), 200-209.
• Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387.
• Wen, H., Zhong, Q., & Lee, C. C. (2022). Digitalization, competition strategy and corporate innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 102166.
• Lee, K., Azmi, N., Hanaysha, J., Alzoubi, H., & Alshurideh, M. (2022). The effect of digital supply chain on organizational performance: An empirical study in Malaysia manufacturing industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 495-510.
• Nazari, F., Rahimipour Anaraki, A., Taghavi, S. S., & Ghasemi, B. (2021). The relationship among knowledge-based dynamic process capabilities, innovation processes and innovation performance: an empirical study of knowledge-based high-tech companies in Iran. Kybernetes, 50(5), 1379-1404.
• Ghayour, F., & Dehghan, K. (2021). The Impact of Quality Costs on Brand Equity Considering the Mediating Role of Green Innovation in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Review, 28(4), 691-712.
• Ahmadi, J., & Letter, T. (2021). The impact of IT capability on company performance: The mediating role of business process management capability and supply chain integration capability. Journal of Social, Management and Tourism Letter, 2021(1), 1-16.
• Moshirian, F., Tian, X., Zhang, B., & Zhang, W. (2021). Stock market liberalization and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(3), 985-1014.
• Zaman, R., Atawnah, N., Haseeb, M., Nadeem, M., & Irfan, S. (2021). Does corporate eco-innovation affect stock price crash risk?. The British Accounting Review, 53(5), 101031. • Azeem, M., Ahmed, M., Haider, S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, 101635.
• Tu, Y., & Wu, W. (2021). How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 504-516.
• Taques, F. H., López, M. G., Basso, L. F., & Areal, N. (2021). Indicators used to measure service innovation and manufacturing innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 6(1), 11-26.
• Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.
• Nugroho, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firm performance. Accounting, 7(1), 13-22.
• Kyere, M., & Ausloos, M. (2021). Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 26(2), 1871-1885.
• Okafor, A., Adeleye, B. N., & Adusei, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from US tech firms. Journal of cleaner production, 292, 126078.
• Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407.
• Shafique, I., Ahmad, B., & Kalyar, M. N. (2020). How ethical leadership influences creativity and organizational innovation: Examining the underlying mechanisms. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 114-133.
• Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. R. (2020). Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. John Wiley & Sons.
• Shabbir, M. S., & Wisdom, O. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility, environmental investments and financial performance: evidence from manufacturing companies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(32), 39946-39957.
• Kristianti, D., & Foeh, J. E. (2020). The Impact Of Liquidity And Profitability On Firm Value With Dividend Policy As An Intervening Variable (Empirical Study Of Manufacturing Companies In The Pharmaceutical Sub Sector Listed On The Indonesia Stock Exchange In 2013-2017). Jurnal Bisnis Dan Kewirausahaan, 16(1), 65-78.
• Yi, J. (2020). Financial flexibility, dynamic capabilities, and the performance of manufacturing enterprises. Journal of Research in Emerging Markets, 2(2), 19.
• Devi, S., Warasniasih, N. M. S., Masdiantini, P. R., & Musmini, L. S. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the financial performance of firms on the Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy Ventura, 23(2), 226-242.
• Tien, N. H., Anh, D. B. H., & Ngoc, N. M. (2020). Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management, 27(2), 694-705.
• Alrowwad, A. A., Abualoush, S. H., & Masa'deh, R. E. (2020). Innovation and intellectual capital as intermediary variables among transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and organizational performance. Journal of Management Development, 39(2), 196-222.
• Lokuge, S., Sedera, D., Grover, V., & Dongming, X. (2019). Organizational readiness for digital innovation: Development and empirical calibration of a construct. Information & management, 56(3), 445-461.
• Battistelli, A., Odoardi, C., Vandenberghe, C., Di Napoli, G., & Piccione, L. J. H. R. D. Q. (2019). Information sharing and innovative work behavior: The role of work‐based learning, challenging tasks, and organizational commitment. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(3), 361-381.
• Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social responsibility journal, 15(1), 11-27.
• Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28(1), 90-103.
• Namazi, M., & Moghimi, F. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Innovation Growth Constructs and Mediating Role of Innovation Challenges on Financial and Economic Performance of Tehran Stock Exchange Companies. Financial Accounting Research, 10(4), 79-104.
• Gošnik, D. (2019). Core Business Process Management and Company Performance. Management (18544223), 14(1).
• Safitri, V. A. D., & Anggara, B. (2019, February). Factors that affect the company innovation. In II. InTradersUluslararası Ticaret Kongresi Kongre Kitabı The Second InTraders International Conference on International Trade Conference Book (Vol. 230).
• Pérez, J. A. H., Geldes, C., Kunc, M. H., & Flores, A. (2019). New approach to the innovation process in emerging economies: The manufacturing sector case in Chile and Peru. Technovation, 79, 35-55.
• Zhou, S. S., Zhou, A. J., Feng, J., & Jiang, S. (2019). Dynamic capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation. Journal of management & organization, 25(5), 731-747.
• Zhang, Y., Khan, U., Lee, S., & Salik, M. (2019). The influence of management innovation and technological innovation on organization performance. A mediating role of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(2), 495.
• Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012-1026.
• Pudjiarti, E. S. (2018). Elements of entrepreneurship in private universities: organizational change capacity, innovative capability and the performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(2).12-30
• Deloitte. (2017). Insurance industry outlook center for financialservices; Deloitte Touche Thomastsu and INN archives.103-119
• Lee, R., Lee, J. H., & Garrett, T. C. (2017). Synergy effects of innovation on firm performance. Journal of Business Research.318-420
• Rajapathirana, R. P. J., & Hui, Y. (2017). Relationship between innovation capability, innovation type, and firm performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge.1003-1115
• Ramanathan, Ram, He, Qile, Black, Andrew, Ghobadian, Abby, Gallear, David, )2016(. Environmental regulations, innovation and firm performance: a revisit of the Porter hypothesis. J. Clean. Prod.
• Rubashkina, Yana, Galeotti, Marzio, Verdolini, Elena, (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy 83 (1), 288-300.
• Vicente, M., Abrantes, J. L., & Teixeira, M. S. (2015). Measuringinnovation capability in exporting firms: the innovscale.International Marketing Review, 32(1), 29–51.
• Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. Journal of business research, 67(1), 2891-2902.
• Lilly, L., & Juma, D. (2014). Influence of strategic innovation onperformance of commercial banks in Kenya: The case ofKenya commercial bank in Nairobi County. European Journal ofBusiness Management, 2(1), 336–341.
• Carrasco,omar &Domingi Garcia(2023).Impact of innovation strategy ,absorpitive capacity,and open innovation on SME performance :a chilean case study.journal of open innivation ,technogy, market and complexity9(2023).100065
• Shaukat,s. ,hassan,m. , Saqib Nawaz,m. Naz ,s(2013). Effects of Innovation Types on Firm Performance: an Empirical Study on Pakistan’s Manufacturing Sector, Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences2013, Vol. 7 (2), 243-262.
• Joao j .m .ferreira.,cristina I fernandes, pedro mota veiga (2024). The effects of knowledge spillivers , digital,capabilities and innivation on firm performance :a moderated mediation midel. Journal of technological forecasting and social change, Vol.200, 243-262.