• Home
  • Evaluating the country's tax system by the effect of cash payments on the company's tax avoidance, taking into account the role of non-executive managers

Share To

Article Url


Manuscript ID : JDEM-2004-2438 (R1) Visit : 341 Page: 11 - 20

Article Type: Original Research

Evaluating the country's tax system by the effect of cash payments on the company's tax avoidance, taking into account the role of non-executive managers

Subject Areas : HSE Management

Kiuomars Amiri 1 , Ali Asghar AnvaryRostamy 2 , Mehrdad Ghanbari 3 , Babak Jamshidinavid 4

1 - PhD student, Department of Accounting, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran.
2 - Professor, Director of the Research Institute of Technology Management and Development Studies, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran
4 - Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah, Iran

Received: 2020-04-17 Accepted : 2020-06-30 Published : 2021-05-22

Keywords: Tax Avoidance, economic policies, Tax System, non-executive managers, development programs,

Abstract :

Iran's tax system has not been developed for various reasons, including the abundance of oil revenues at various times, in proportion to the country's economic capacity, and despite repeated emphasis in upstream documents on the need to cut government funding for oil revenues by increasing non-revenue share Oil, especially tax revenues, have not materialized so far. Therefore, the transformation of the tax system is essential in order to improve its situation in terms of its functions and in order to achieve the goals set out in the law of the Sixth Plan, especially its quantitative goals. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between cash profit and the independence of the board of directors on tax avoidance of the company within the framework of the country's tax system. The test method of the hypotheses of this research has been done by the econometric method of data panel and using the Ivyuz software. Research findings show that; Cash payments have a significant effect on tax avoidance. Also, the percentage of non-executive managers has a significant effect on tax avoidance. And the percentage of non-executive managers does not have a significant effect on the relationship between cash dividends and tax avoidance. The results of this study can be useful for the decisions of managers, investors, shareholders, creditors, tax authorities, tax law makers, auditing and other auditors, stock exchange and securities organizations, analysts and researchers.

References:


  1.  اسکندرلی طاهر، رجبلو آزاده. (1395). بررسی رابطه بین حاکمیت شرکتی، انگیزه‌های مدیران و اجتناب مالیاتی، ششمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی حسابداری و مدیریت با رویکرد علوم پژوهشی نوین، تهران، شرکت ارتباط ارغوان ایرانیان.
    2.
  2.  حمیدیان، محسن. (1396). بررسی ابعاد مختلف راهبری شرکتی با اجتناب مالیاتی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. دانش سرمایه‌گذای. دوره 6، شماره 23، صفحه 229-244.
    3.
  3.  ابوطالبی، مریم.، حسینی، سیده مهسا. (1398). نقش حسابداری در بهبود نظام مالیاتی کشور، چهارمین کنفرانس ملی در مدیریت، حسابداری و اقتصاد با تاکید بر بازاریابی منطقه‌ای و جهانی، تهران - دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، دبیرخانه دائمی کنفرانس.
    4.
  4. رستمی، جلال.، هاشمی قیری، سیدهادی. (1395). ارتباط بین مالیات بر در آمد و تقسیم سود شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پنجمین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت، اقتصاد و حسابداری، تبریز، دانشگاه فنی و حرفه‌ای استان آذربایجان شرقی، سازمان مدیریت صنعتی تبریز.
    5.
  5.     سپاسی، سحر، کاظمپور، مرتضی، شعبانی مازوئی، منور. (1395). رقابت در بازار محصول و تأثیر آن بر سه معیار مهم در تصمیم‌گیری؛ هزینه نمایندگی، ساختار سرمایه و هزینه سرمایه. پژوهش‌های حسابداری. دوره 6، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 24، صفحه 67-84.
    6.
  6. قنبری، مهرداد.، امیری، کیومرث.، انواری رستمی، علی اصغر.، جمشیدی، نوید بابک. (1398). شناسایی و ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های نظام مالیاتی سازگار با توسعه اقتصادی کشور با استفاده از روش ترکیبی دلفی و تصمیم‌گیری چند معیاره. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 10(37), 65-90.
    7.
  7. طاهری‌فرد، احمدرضا.، صالحی، اله کرم. (1395). بررسی رابطه استقلال هیئت مدیره و اجتناب مالیاتی در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پنجمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی حسابداری و مدیریت و دومین کنفرانس کارآفرینی و نوآوری‌های باز، تهران، همایشگران مهر اشراق.
    8.
  8.  فلاح، علی، وندادی، مهری.، مودت، شقایق.، سعادت نژاد، ربابه. (1395). اثر اجتناب مالیاتی بر کیفیت بازار و تقسیم سود شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، هفتمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی حسابداری و مدیریت و چهارمین کنفرانس کارآفرینی و نوآوری‌های باز، تهران، شرکت همایشگران مهر اشراق.
    9.
  9. Amiram, D., Bauer, A.M., Frank,M.M. (2016). Tax Avoidance at Public Corporations Driven by Shareholder Taxes: Evidence From Changes in Dividend tax Policy. Darden Business SchoolWorking Paper No. 2111467, July 07, 2016. Columbia University, University of Illinois and University of Virginia.
    10.
  10.  Armstrong, C.S., Blouin, J.L., Jagolinzer, A.D., Larcker, D.F. (2015). Corporate Governance, Incentives, and tax Avoidance. J. Account. Econ. 60 (1):1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003.
    11.
  11.  Boone, J.P., Khurana, I.K., Raman, K.K. (2013). Religiosity and tax Avoidance. J. Am. Tax. Assoc. 35 (1):53–84. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-50341.
    12.
  12. [12]  Blouin, J., Krull, L. (2009). Bringing it Home: A Study of the Incentives Surrounding the Repatriation of Foreign Earnings Under the American jobs creation act of 2004. J. Account. Res. 47 (4):1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00342.x.
    13.
  13.   Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., Shevlin, T. (2011). Are Family Firms more Tax Aggressive than Non-Family Firms?. J. Financ. Econ. 95 (1):41–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfineco.2009.02.003.
    14.
  14.  Chi, S.S., Pincus, M., Teoh, S.H. (2013). Mispricing of Book-Tax Differences and the Trading Behavior of Short Sellers and Insiders. Account. Rev. 89 (2):511–543. https:// doi.org/10.2308/accr-50644
    15.
  15.   Desai, M.A., Dharmapala, D. (2009). Corporate tax Avoidance and firm value. Rev. Econ. Stat. 91 (3):537–546. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.3.537.
    16.
  16.  Dyreng, S.D., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E.L. (2008). Long-Run Corporate tax Avoidance. Account. Rev. 83 (1):61–82. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.1.61.
    17.
  17.   Gupta, S., Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective tax Rates: Evidence from Longitudinal data. J. Account. Public Policy 16 (1):1–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(96)00055-5.
    18.
  18.   Hanlon, M., Slemrod, J. (2009). What does tax Aggressiveness Signal? Evidence from Stock Price Reactions to news about tax Shelter Involvement. J. Public Econ. 93 (1): 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.004
    19.
  19.   Inger, K.K. (2013). Relative Valuation of Alternative Methods of tax Avoidance. J. Am. Tax. Assoc. 36 (1):27 55. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-50606.
    20.
  20.   Kim, J.B., Li, Y., Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock price Crash Risk: Firm-level Analysis. J. Financ. Econ. 100 (3):639–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jfineco.2010.07.007.
    21.
  21.  Lanis, R., Richardson, G. (2013). Corporate social Responsibility and tax Aggressiveness: a test of Legitimacy Theory. Account. Audit. Account. J. 26 (1):75–100. https:// doi.org/10.1108/09513571311285621
    22.
  22.   Lanis, R., Richardson, G. (2011). The Effect of Board of Director Composition on Corporate tax Aggressiveness. J. Account. Public Policy 30 (1):50–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2010.09.003.
    23.
  23.   Ross McClure, Roman Lanis, PeterWells, Brett Govendir. (2018).  The Impact of Dividend Imputation on Corporate Tax Avoidance:The Case of Shareholder value. Journal of Corporate Finance 48 492–514.
    24.
  24.   McGuire, S.T., Omer, T.C.,Wilde, J.H. (2013). Investment Opportunity Sets, Operating Uncertainty, and Capital Market Pressure: Determinants of Investments in tax Shelter Activities?. J. Am. Tax. Assoc. 36 (1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-50599.
    25.
  25.   Rego, S.O., Wilson, R. (2012). Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. J. Account. Res. 50 (3):775–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475- 679X.2012.00438.x.
    26.
  26.  Richardson, G., Lanis, R., Leung, S.C., (2014). Corporate tax Aggressiveness, Outside Directors, and Debt Policy: An Empirical Analysis. J. Corp. Finan. 25:107–121. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.010
    27.
  27.   Saavedra, D. (2013). Analysis of Unsuccessful tax Avoiders (Working Paper, September 30, 2013). University of California Los Angeles https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.2486917
    28.
  28.   Wilson, R.J. (2009). An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. Account. Rev. 84 (3):969–999. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.969.
    29.
  29.  Almunia, M., Gerard, F., Hjort, J.,  Knebelmann, J., Nakyambadde, D., Raisaro, C., Tian, L. (2018). An Analysis of Discrepancies in Tax Declarations Submitted Under Value-Added Tax in Uganda.
    30.
  30.   Germana, G., Désirée, T. (2019). Interaction Effect of tax Evasion and Legal System Inefficiency on firms' Financial Constraints. International Review of Economics & Finance Volume 55, May 2018, Pages 1-20
    31.
_||_

Related articles

The rights to this website are owned by the Raimag Press Management System.
Copyright © 2021-2024

Home| Login| About Us| Contact Us|
[فارسی] [العربية] [fa] [ar]