References:
1. Adkins, L. G., and Garbaccio, R. F. (2007). Coordinating Global
Trade and Environmental Policy: The role of pre-existing
distortions. National Center for Environmental Economics U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. United
States.
2. Beghin, J., Dessus, S., Ronald-Holst, D., and Mensbrugghe, V. D.
(2002). Empirical Modeling of Trade and Environment. Trade
and Environment in General Equilibrium: Evidence from
Developing Economics, Chapter 3: 31-78.
3. Bjertnæs, G. H. and Fæhn, T. (2008). Energy taxation in a small,
open economy: Social efficiency gains versus industrial concerns.
Energy Economics, 30: 2050–2071.
4. Bohringer, C., and Loschel, A. (2006). Computable general
equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment: Status
quo and prospects. Ecological Economics, 60, 49–64.
5. Bureau, B. (2011). Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car
fuels in France. Energy Economics, 33; 121–130.
6. Carraro, C., Siniscalco, D. (1993). Strategies for the international
protection of the environment. Journal of Public Economics, 52,
309–328.
7. Central Bank of Iran (1999). Iranian Social Accounting Matrix of
1999. < http://www.cbi.ir/simplelist/5728.aspx>.
8. Dessus, S., and Bussolo, M. (1998). Is there a trade-off between
trade liberalization and pollution abatement?. Journal of Policy
Modeling, 20(1), 11-31.
9. Devarajan, S. (1988). Natural resources and taxation in
computable general equilibrium models of developing countries.
Journal of Policy Modeling, 10(4), 505–528.
10. Devarajan, S., & Hossain, S. I. (1998). The combined incidence
of taxes and public expenditures in the Philippines.World
Development, 26(6), 963–977.
11. Dissou, Y. and Eyland, T. (2011). Carbon control policies,
competitiveness, and border tax adjustments. Energy Economics,
33: 556–564.
12. Fæhn, T., and Holmøy, E. (2003). Trade liberalization and effects
on pollutive emissions to air and deposits of solid waste. A
general equilibrium assessment for Norway. Economic Modeling,
20, 703-727.
13. FAO Statistical Database (2008) http://www.fao.org.
14. Farajzadeh, Z. (2012). Envronmental and welfare impacts of trade
energy policy reforms in Iran. Ph.D thesis. Shiraz University.
Shiraz.
15. Gooroochurn, N., & Milner, C. (2005). Assessing indirect tax
reform in a tourism-dependent developing country. World
Development, 33(7), 1183–1200.
16. Iran’s Energy Balance (2009). Deputy of Electricity and Energy
Affairs, Ministry of Energy, Tehran. < http://pep.moe.org.ir>.
17. Iranian Ministry of Agriculture (2008). Cost Statistical Yearbook.
< http://dbagri.maj.ir/cost/>.
18. Jensen, J., and Tarr, T. (2003). Trade, exchange rate, and energy
pricing reform in Iran: Potentially large efficiency effects and
gains to the poor. Review of Development Economics, 7(4), 543–
562.
19. Kerkhof, A. C., Nonhebel, S., Moll, H. C., 2009. Relating the
environmental impact of consumption to household expenditures:
An input- output analysis. Ecological Economics 68, 1160-1170.
20. Kumbaro ˘glu, S. G. (2003). Environmental taxation and
economic effects: A computable general equilibrium analysis for
Turkey. Journal of Policy Modeling, 25(8), 795–810.
21. Liang, Q.M., Fan, Y. and Wei, Y.M. (2007). Carbon taxation
policy in China: How to protect energy- and trade-intensive
sectors?. Journal of Policy Modeling 29, 311–333.
22. Lofgren, H. (1999). Exercises in general equilibrium modeling
Using GAMS. International Food Policy Research Institute.
Washington, D. C. United States.
23. McDonald, S., Thierfelder, K., and Robinson, S. (2007). Globe: A
SAM based global CGE model using GTAP Data. Available at
http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/usnusnawp/14.htm.
24. Moghimi, M., Shahnooshi-Forooshani, N., Danesh, S., AkbariMoghaddam,
B. and Daneshvar, M. (2011). Investigating welfare
and environmental impacts of green tax and energy subsidy
reduction using computable general equilibrium. Agricultural
Economics and Development, 75: 79-108.
25. Strutt, A., and Anderson, K. (1999). Estimating environmental
effects of trade agreements with global age models: A GTAP
application to Indonesia. CIES Discussion Paper No. 99/26.
Centre for International Economic Studies.
http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cies.
26. Toh, M. H., & Lin, Q. (2005). An evaluation of the 1994 tax
reform in China using a general equilibrium model. China
Economic Review, 16(3), 246–270.
27. UN Statistical Databases. (2008). http://data.un.org
28. United Nations Development Program, 2010. Department of
Environment. Iran second National Communication to United
Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
National Climate Change Office, Department of Environment.
Tehran.
29. van der Mensbrugghe, D., Roland-Holst, D., Dessus, S. and
Beghin, J. (1998). The interface between growth, trade, pollution
and natural resource use in Chile: evidence from an economy
wide model. Agricultural Economics, 19: 87-97.
30. Wissema, W. (2007). Carbon energy taxation and revenue
recycling An applied general equilibrium analysis for the Irish
economy: AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on
the Irish economy. PhD thesis, Dublin University, Trinity College
Dublin
31. Wissema, W. and Dellink, R. (2007). AGE analysis of the impact
of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy. Ecological
Economics, 61: 671-683.
32. World Bank (2004). Islamic Republic of Iran energy-environment
review policy note. Report No. 29062-IR. Washington D.C.
33. Yilmaz, K. (1999). Optimal export taxes in a multi-country
framework. Journal of Development Economics, 60(2), 439–465
