Abstract :
Regarding the importance of kiwi production in Iran and
necessity of penetrating global markets, surveying of export situation in
the presence of competitors is essential. This study aims to explore
export advantage of Iran’s kiwi against its main rivals. Revealed
comparative advantage (RCA) investigation results showed that export
advantage of Iran was increased during 1990-2005 period. Minimum and
maximum amounts of the index were 1.669 and 10.620 for 1999 and
2005, respectively showing total growth of 88.863. Export advantage of
Iran’s kiwi was significantly related to its export. Increase in export
advantage of Chile’s kiwi had negative impact on Iran’s advantage
indicating that Chile’s export could replace Iran’s export. New-Zeeland’s
export advantage supports Iran’s export advantage. Furthermore, an
increase in import advantage of Turkey and Russia as major importers of
Iran’s kiwi would increase Iran’s export advantage. It is suggested that
these potential markets need to be taken into consideration in the future.
References:
1. حسینی س. ص. رفیعی ح. 1387. بررسی مزیت نسبی تولیدی و صادراتی پسته ایران،
مجله اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، 57 -45 :2.
2. سلامی ح. پیشبهار الف. 1380. تغییرات الگوی مزیت نسبی محصولات کشاورزی در
ایران، فصلنامه اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، 99 - 67 :34.
3. صداقت ر. 1386. بررسی رشد و عوامل موثر بر توان رقابتی پسته ایران در بـازار جهـانی ،
مجله اقتصاد و کشاورزی، 125 - 115 :1.
4. صفوی ب. تور م. 1384. برآورد تابع تولید کیوی در اسـتان مازنـدران، فـصلنامه اقتـصاد
کشاورزی و توسعه، 237-227 :52.
5. عزیزی ج. یزدانـی س. 1383. تعیـین مزیـت نـسبی محـصولات عمـده باغبـانی ایـران،
فصلنامه اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه، 71 - 41 :46.
6. Amirteimoori S. and Chizari .H. A. 2008. An Investigation of
Comparative Advantage of Pistachio Production and Exports in
Iran. Journal of Agriculture Science Technology. 10: 359-403.
7. Aquino A. 1981. Change over time in the patterns of comparative
advantage in manufactured good: An empirical analysis for the
period 1972-1974. European Economic Review, 15: 41-62.
8. Balassa B. 1965. Trade liberalization and revealed comparative
advantage. Manchester School of Economic and Social
Studies.33: 92– 123.
9. Balassa B. 1979. The changing pattern of comparative advantage
in manufactured goods. Review of Economics and Statistics, 61:
259– 266.
10. Balassa B. 1986. Comparative advantage in manufactured goods:
a reappraisal. Review of Economics and Statistics, 68: 315– 319.
11. Brasili A. Epifani P. and Helg R. 2002. On the dynamics of trade
patterns. Cespri, Working Paper, 115, Italy.
12. Crafts N. F. R. and Tomas M. 1986. Comparative advantage in
UK manufactured trade, 1910-1935. Economic Journal, 96: 629-
645.
13. Dalum, B., Laursen, K. and Villimsen, G. 1998. Structural change
in the OECD export specialization patterns: de-specialization and
stickiness. International Review of Applied Economics, 12: 423–
443.
14. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2007.
<www.fao.org>.
15. Karakaya E. and Özgen F.B. 2002. Economic Feasibility of
Turkey’s Economic Integration with the EU: Perspectives from
Trade Creation and Trade Diversion, paper presented at the
METU VI. International Conference in Economics, Ankara.
16. Laursen K. 1998. Revealed comparative advantage and the
alternatives as measures of international specialization.
Department of industrial economics and strategy, Working Paper,
pp 30-98.
17. Lim, K. T. 1997. Analysis of North Koreas foreign trade by
revealed comparative advantage. Journal of Econometric
Development, 22:97-117.
18. Serin V. and Civan A. 2008. Revealed Comparative Advantage
and Competitiveness: A Case Study for Turkey towards the EU.
Journal of Economic and Social Research. 10: 25-41.
19. Vollrath T.L .1991. A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade
intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage.
Weltwirtschaftliches Archive. 127: 265– 280.
