Effective factors of expenditures domestic research and development and spillovers R&D trading partners of imports channel of the agricultural sector in Iran
Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Researchابوالفضل sh 1 , فریبا مهری تلیایی 2
1 - استاد گروه اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان.
2 - دانشجوی دکتری توسعه اقتصادی دانشکده اقتصاد و علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان.
Keywords: GMM, Added Value Agricultural Sector, Technology Gap, Systems of Simultaneous Equations,
Abstract :
The period studied in this research 1971-2011 and estimates is based on a system of simultaneous equations and GMM method. Results research indicates that one percent increase in domestic research and development, human capital sector agriculture, degree of trade openness, real exchange rate and oil and gas exports are lead to a change external research and development in order the amount of 0/15, 2/22, 0/38, 0/33 and 0/87. Also, one percentage increase in the human capital of sector agriculture, degree of trade openness and oil and gas export leads to changing domestic research and development in order the amount of 4/04, 0/20 and 0/09. According to research results and in order to reduce the technology gap is suggested, coordinated demand side of policies with research of policies in direction create incentives in the economic actors the purpose of investment in research and development of agricultural sector, and with educational policy in order to develop human capital in order to attract new technologies of import channels and foreign direct investment flows.
- Amiri, M. (2010). The role of domestic and foreign research and development activities accumulation on the growth of total factor productivity of the agricultural sector, master thesis, the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, Bu Ali Sina University in Hamedan, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences. (In Persion)
- Audinet, J-P. & Haralambous, S. (2005). Achieving the millennium development goals: Rural investment and enabling policy. Panel Discussion Paper, IFAD Governing Council – Twenty-Eighth Session
- Cai, Zh., An, T. & Zhang, H. (2013). Study on robustness test of determinants of R&D Investment: Evidence from BRICS countries. Journal of Convergence Information Technology (JCIT), Vol. 8, No. 8: pp. 914-921.
- Cheung, K. Y. & Lin, P. (2004). Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data. China Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 1: pp. 25-44.
- Coe, D.T. & Helpman, E. (1995). International R&D spillovers. European Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 5: pp. 859-887.
- C Wang, E. (2010). Determinants of R&D investment: The extreme-bounds- analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries. Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 2: pp. 103-116.
- Dakhli, M. & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital and innovation: A multi country study. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Vol. 16, No. 2: pp. 107-128.
- Dalgıç, B. & Mıhçı, S. (2013). Technology spillovers through imports and absorptive capacity in Turkey. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 3, No. 17: pp. 309-321.
- Dipietro, W.R. (2015). Natural Resource Rental Income and R&D Intensity. Archive Research Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1: pp. 202-208.
- Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2015). Available at http://www.fao.org/statistics/databases/en
- Griliches, Z. (1998). Productivity puzzles and R&D: Another nonexplanation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 2: pp. 9-21.
- Grossman, G. M. & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, Vol. 35, No.3: pp. 517-526.
- Hosseini, S.S. & Shahbazi, H. (2014). Determination of the optimum expenditures agricultural research in Iran, Iranian Agricultural Economics and Development Research, Vol. 45, No. 1: pp. 23-40 (In Persion).
- Komijani, A. & Shahabadi, A. (2001). Effect of domestic and foreign R&D activities (through foreign trade) on total factor productivity, Journal of Commerce, Vol. 5, No. 18: pp. 29-68 (In Persion).
- Limanli, O. (2015). Determinants of R&D Investment Decision in Turkey. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 195, No. 2015: PP. 759 – 767.
- Mansfield, E. (1988). Industrial R&D in Japan and the United States A Comparative Study, American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 78: PP. 223-228.
- Markusen, J. R. (1986). Explaining the volume of trade: an eclectic approach. American Economic Review, No. 76: PP. 1002–1011.
- Ping, L. & Qingchang, Zh. (2008). The effects of technological spillover through FDI and import trade on China’s innovation. School of Economy of Shandong University of Technology, www.seiofbluemountain.com/search/detail.php?id=3948.
- Sameti, M., Ranjbar, H. & Anoshe, SH. (2011). Determinants of investment in research and development, Newspaper
The Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Management, http://beykon.org/dergi/2010/FALL/M.Sameti.pdf (In Persion).
- Shahabadi, A. & Bashiri Monazzam, F. (2011). The role of knowledge components in the added value of the agricultural sector of Iran, Rural and Development Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4: pp. 105-125 (In Persion).
- Shahabadi. A., Bashiri Monazzam. F. & Mehry Teliaby. F. (2015). The effect of innovation through of R&D on the growth added value of Iran's agriculture Sector Scientific, Promote-Scientific Quarterly Yas Strategy, Vol.12, Nol. 44: pp. 52-69 (In Persion).
- Shahabadi, A. & Havaj, S. (2011). Effects of technology spillover through foreign direct investment and imports of Innovation, Economic Development Research Quarterly, Vol. 1, No. 4: pp. 1-20 (In Persion).
- Shahabady, A. & Salimi, S. (2015). The impact of good governance on R&D intensity developed and developing countries, Scientific –Research Quarterly Science and Technology, Vol. 7. No. 2: pp. 35-46 (In Persion).
- Shahabadi, A. & Sarigol, S. (2014). The effect of governance and intellectual property right on knowledge spillover in selected developing countries, Research of Commerce Quarterly, Vol. 21, No.78 (In Persion).
- Sharifinia, Z., Moshiri, S.R. & Ali Hosseini A. (2010). The role of rural poverty on sustainable development (environmental degradation: pasture) case study: behind the water city sector of Zabol, Scientific -Research Quarterly Geographical of Territory, Vol. 7. No. 26: pp. 15-29 (In Persion).
- Sinha, S. & Lipton, M. (1999). Damaging fluctuations, risk, and poverty. A Review Background Paper for the World Development Report 2000/2001.
- Soltani, G.R. (2004). Determines the rate of return on investment in the agricultural sector, Agricultural Economics and Development Quarterly, Vol. 12, No. 45: pp. 19-40 (In Persion).
- Soltani, S., Alishahi, M & Bahrami Mehneh, F. (2007). Study situation investment in the agricultural sector of Iran and ways of increasing it, The Sixth Conference of Agricultural Economics of Iran, Mashhad, Agricultural Economics Association Of Iran, Ferdowsi of Mashhad University, holding the on 30 and 31 October. http://www.civilica.com/Paper-IAEC06-IAEC06_212.html (In Persion).
- The Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration (2014). annual statistics import, the years 1976 to 2009, Tehran. Available at http://www.irica.gov.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=fd61187e-a080-4800-bb4b-0a3d0946cc10
- Turkcan, B. & Kaya, A. (2011). Internationalization of research and development activities case of European countries and Turkey. http://www.iibf.ege.edu.tr/economics/papers/wp11-01.pdf.
- World Bank. (2014). World bank agricultural research by region,.Washington, D.C. available at http://www.worldbank.org/ data/ online database. html).
- Zachariadis, M. (2002). R&D, innovation, and technological progress: A test of the Schumpeterian framework without scale effects. Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, No. 3: pp. 566-586.
- Gomrok Islamic Republic of Iran in (1393). annual statistics import, the years 1976 to 2009, Tehran. Available at
http://www.irica.gov.ir/Portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=fd61187e-a080-4800-bb4b-0a3d0946cc10
_||_