Assessing the effect of government infrastructure expenditure on income distribution in rural Iran: FAVAR Model

Subject Areas : Agricultural Economics Research

سعید Ebrahimi ¹ , S.k Sadeghi ² , M.B Beheshti ³ , رضا ranjpoor ⁴

1 - دانش آموخته دکتری اقتصاد دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی دانشگاه تبریز.
2 - دانشیار دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی دانشگاه تبریز.
3 - استاد دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی دانشگاه تبریز.
4 - دانشیار دانشکده اقتصاد، مدیریت و بازرگانی دانشگاه تبریز.

Received: 2017-01-21 Accepted : 2019-01-15 Published : 2018-12-22

Keywords: Government expenditure, Rural income distribution, FAVAR model, Impulse Response Function,

Abstract :

The role of rural area in food security, exports, GDP, employment and income, has led to implementation some programs to strengthen socio-economic infrastructures in order to reduce inequality and improve income distribution in rural areas. Investment in infrastructure is one of the appropriate mechanisms for the sustainable development of rural areas and to promote equitable distribution of income. In this paper, using FAVAR method and quarterly data for the period 1369:q1- 1393:q4 for 99 macroeconomic variable, the impact of government expenditure on the Gini coefficient in rural Iran have been investigated. Impulse response functions show that a positive shock of one standard deviation in government expenditure, reduce Gini coefficient and improving income distribution after 3 season. Also variance decomposition results show that after the four season, government expenditure have the most important role in the dynamics of rural Gini coefficient.

References:

- Adams, R.H .(2004). Economic growth, inequality and poverty: Estimating the growth elasticity of poverty. World development. Vol. 32. No. 12. pp. 1989-2014.

- Baer, W., & Fialho, A. (2008). Tax burden, government expenditures and income distribution in Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance. Vol. 48. No. 2. pp. 345–358.

- Bai, J., & Ng, S (2002). Determining the number of factor in approximate factor models. Economica. Vol. 70. No. 1. pp. 191-221.

- Banerjee. A., & Somanathan. R .(2007). The political economy of public goods: Someevidence from India.  Journal of Development Economics. Vol. 82. 287-314.

- Bernanke, B., Boivin, J., & Eliasz, P. (2005). Measuring the effects of monetary policy: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics.Vol. 120. No. 1. pp. 387–422.

- Blaes, B. (2009). Money and monetary policy transmission in the Euro Area: Evidence from FAVAR and VAR approaches. Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper. No. 18.

- Brakman, S., Garretsen, H., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2002). Locational competition andagglomeration: The role of government spending. CESifoWorking Paper. No.775.

- Breitung, J., Eickmeier, S. (2005). Dynamic factor model. Deutsche Bundes bank Discussion paper. Economic Studies. No 38..

- Calderon, C., & Serven, L. (2004). The effects of infrastructure development on growth andincome distribution. World Bank Policy Research Paper. No. 3400.

- Cevik. S., & Correa-Caro. C .(2015). Growing (un)equal: fiscal policy and income inequality in China and BRIC+. IMF Working Paper. No. 15/68.

- Charlery, L., Qaim, M., & Carsten, S .(2016). Impact of infrastructure on rural household income and inequality in Nepal. Journal of Development Effectiveness. Vol. 8. No. 2. pp. 266-286.

- De Mello, L., & Tiongson, E .(2003). Income inequality and redistributive rovernment spending. IMF Working Paper. No. 03/14.

- Fan, S., Hazell, P., & Thorat, S. (2000). Government spending growth and poverty in rural India. American journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol. 82. No. 4. pp. 1038-1051.

- Ferranti, D., Perry,G., Ferreira, F & Walton, M. (2004). Inequality in Latin America: breaking with history?. The World Bank. World Bank Latin American and Caribbean Studies. Washington DC.

- Goni, E., Lopez, J.H., & Serven, L .(2011). Fiscal redistribution and income inequality in Latin America. World Development. Vol. 39. No. 9. pp. 1558-1569.

- Hanjra, M.A., Tadele, F., & Debel Gemechu, G. (2009). Reducing poverty in sub-Saharan Africa through investments in water and other priorities. Journal of Agricultural WaterManagement. Vol. 96. No. 7. pp. 1062-107.

- Ivanov. V., & Kilian, L .(2005). A Practitioner’s Guide to Lag Order Selection for VAR Impulse Response Analysis. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics. Vol. 9. No.1. pp. 1-34

- Kaiser, H.F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 20. pp. 141-151.

- Kimenju, S.C., & Tschirley, D .(2008). Agricultural and livelihood diversification in Kenyan ruralhouseholds. Tegemeo Institute Working Paper Series. No. 29.

- Khandker, S.R., Bakht, Z., & Koolwal, G.B .(2006). The poverty impact of rural roads: evidence from Bangladesh. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. No. 3875.

- Lofgren, H., & Robinson, S. (2004). Public spending. growth and poverty alleviation in  sub-Saharan Africa: A dynamic general equilibrium analysis. The seventh Annual Conference  on Global Economic Analysis. World Bank. Washington. D.C.

- Pesaran, M. H., Shin,Y. (1998). Impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics Letters. Vol. 58. pp. 17-29.

- Sadoullet, G .(2006). Index of inequality in economics. Journal of Rural Economy. Vol. 13. pp. 201-251

- Warr, P .(2003). Fiscal policies and poverty incidence: The case of Thailand. Asian economic journal. Vol. 17. No. 1. pp. 27-44.

- Warr, P .(2010). Roads and poverty in rural LAOS: An econometric analysis. Pacific Economic Review. Vol. 15. No. 1. pp. 152-169.

- UN Millennium Project .(2005). Investing in development: A practical plan to achievethe Millennium Development Goals. London: Earthscan.

- Zhang, Y., & Wan, G . (2006). The impact of growth and inequality or rural poverty in China. Journal of Comparative Economics. Vol. 34. No. 4. pp. 694–712.

- Zhang, X., & Fan, S .(2004). Public investment and regional inequality