Types of e-learning and Expert-Based Evaluation

Subject Areas : Intelligent Multimedia Processing and Communication Systems (IMPCS)

Mostafa  jafari ¹ (University of Zanjan- University of Literature and Humanities- Zanjan- Iran)
khadijeh  chenari ² (Alzahra University)
Shokouh  Nourizadeh Vahed Dehkordi ³ (Isfahan- Iran)

Received: 2020-12-27 Accepted : 2021-03-28 Published : 2020-09-22

Keywords: E-Learning, Assessment, needs, Learning, model,

Abstract :

Nowadays, countries must be able to live and interact in the digital world and be able to interact with people and institutions in cyberspace. The subject of this article is to introduce the components of the e-learning model. This issue has already been studied in different articles and given different aspects. In this paper, the components of e-learning and relationships between them are introduced using a mixed qualitative research method and by receiving the opinions of the elites and summarizing them. Scholars in the field of education believe that principled planning for education in any environment, age, subject and context requires a redefinition of principles in the three bases. These three pillars are needs assessment, training and evaluation. In the present study, each of these factors is examined and the general components of the e-learning model are introduced along with the relationships between them. Also, in this paper, different types of offline and online e-learning are classified and the differences of some previous categories are reported. According to the results of this study, expert-based evaluation method is more appropriate for this problem.

References:

[1] Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade Level: Tracking Online Education in the United States (Rep.). Babson Survey Research Group.

[2] Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities.

[3] Baloyi, G., P. (2014a). Learner Support in the Open Distance Learning and E-Learning Context Using the Community of Inquiry Model.

[4] Baloyi, G., P. (2014b). Learner Support in Open Distance and E-Learning for Adult Students Using Technologies.

[5] Chen, S., J. (2007). Instructional design strategies for intensive online courses: An objectivist constructivist blended approach. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1).

[6] Chawinga, W., D. (2016). Increasing Access to Higher Education through Open and Distance Learning: Empirical Findings from Mzuzu University, Malawi.

[7] Dorothy Ruth Queiros M.R. (Ruth) de Villiers. (2016). Online Learning in a South African Higher Education Institution: Determining the Right Connections for the Student

[8] DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-86. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60.

[9] Gaebel, M., Veronika, V., Morais, R. Elizabeth, E. (2014). E-learning in European Higher Education Institutions November 2014 Results of a mapping survey.

[10] Kaufman, Roger. "A possible taxonomy of needs assessments." Educational technology 17.11 (1977): 60-64.

[11] Kashorda, M., &Waema, T. (2014). E-Readiness survey of Kenyan Universities (2013) report. Nairobi: Kenya Education Network.

[12] Kisanga, D. (2016). Determinants of Teachers’ Attitudes towards E-Learning in Tanzanian Higher Learning Institutions.

[13] Makokha, L., & and Mutisya, D., N. (2016). Status of e-Learning in Public Universities in Kenya. Kenyatta University, South Eastern Kenya University.

[14] Matipa., R. and Cheryl Brown, C. (2015). Influence of Ideological Contradictions when Adopting ICTs to Create Authentic Learning Activities.

[15] Masoumi, D., & Lindström, B. (2012). Quality in e-learning: a framework for promoting and assuring quality in virtual institutions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 27- 41.