Jurisprudential examination of the use of artificial and robotic organs instead of transplanted organs
seyed hosein shahcheragh
1
(
PhD student, Department of Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
)
seyed mahmood majidi
2
(
Department of Law, Damghan University, Damghan, Iran.
)
mahdi zolfaghari
3
(
Department of Law, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
)
Keywords: member', s revenge., , , , , ", , ", , , , , , Organ transplant.,
Abstract :
One of the challenging issues in the field of crime against organs is organ transplants carried out by a criminal. Or that she had this opportunity and the opportunity to do it and deliberately kept it A person does not have the right to transplant a retaliated limb unless a person who is a victim of a severed limb transplants or a person does the transplant with the consent of a victim. This is due to the similarity in retribution. But Johnny can use an artificial organ or a robotic (intelligent) organ instead of organ transplant. According to the majority of jurists, the use of artificial or robotic organs is permissible and this issue does not conflict with the philosophy of retribution, because retribution has been implemented and with the implementation of retribution, similarity has been observed. Also, artificial organs are considered property in terms of their nature, and their destruction or destruction has It is a financial guarantee and if the obligee does this act against him.