The Estimation of Body Weight from Body Measurements in Kilakarsal Sheep of Tamil Nadu, India

Subject Areas : Camel

T. Ravimurugan ¹ , A.K. Thiruvenkadan ² , K. Sudhakar ³ , S. Panneerselvam ⁴ , A. Elango ⁵

1 - Veterinary College and Research Institute, Tirunelveli, 627 358, Tamil Nadu, India
2 - Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding,Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, 637 002, Tamil Nadu, India
3 - Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding,Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, 637 002, Tamil Nadu, India
4 - Department of Animal Genetics and Breeding,Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, 637 002, Tamil Nadu, India
5 - Department of Dairy Science, Veterinary College and Research Institute, Namakkal, 637 002, Tamil Nadu, India

Received: 2012-03-12 Accepted : 2012-05-01 Published : 2013-06-01

Keywords: Regression, Prediction, Correlation, body weight, Kilakarsal sheep,

Abstract :

Data on body weight and body measurements (body length, height at withers, chest girth and paunch girth) of adult Kilakarsal sheep have been collected from 124 adult animals managed at the farmers filed in Tirunelveli districts of Tami Nadu, India to estimate the body weight from body measurements. The data were subjected to standard statistical analysis using SPSS software and linear regression analysis was appliedby keeping the body weight as the dependant variables and different body measurements as independent variables. The overall means (±SE) for body weight, body length and height at withers, chest girth and paunch girth of Kilakarsal sheep pooled over sexes were 23.39 ±0.33 kg, 56.92 ±0.31 cm, 69.74 ± 0.33 cm, 71.92 ±0.44 cm and 69.44 ± 0.49 cm, respectively. The Pearson correlation coefficient between body weight with body length, height at withers, chest girth and paunch girth were 0.525, 0.531, 0.831 and 0.761, respectively. The R2 values for the regression equation, considering individual independent variables viz.body length, height at withers, chest girth and paunch girth were 0.276, 0.282, 0.691 and 0.579, respectively. The highest R2 value was obtained from chest girth variable followed by paunch girth. The R2 values increased with the addition of independent variables in the equation and the maximum R2 value was obtained as 0.783 from all the variables. The study revealed that the chest girth is the best predictor for the estimation of body weight and this alone contributed 69.1 per cent variation in the body weight of adult Kilakarsal sheep.

References:

Afolayan R.A., Adeyinka I.A. and Lakpini C.A.M. (2006).The estimation of live weight from body measurements in Yankasa sheep. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 51, 343-348.
Baffour-Awuah O., Ampofo E. and Dodoo R. (2000). Predicting the liveweight of sheep by using linear body measurement. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 33, 207-212.
Chandran P.C., Kandasamy N. and Panneerselvam S. (2009). Distribution, characteristics and management of Vembur sheep. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 79, 73-77.
Enevoldsen C. and Kristensen T. (1997).Estimation of body weight from body size measurements and body condition scores in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80, 1988-1995.
Ganesakale D. and Rathnasabapathy V. (1973). Sheep breeds of Tamil Nadu. Cheiron. 2, 146-155.
Islam M.R., Saadullah M., Howlider A.R. and Huq M.A. (1991).Estimation of live weight and dressed carcass weight from different body measurements in goats. IndianJ. Anim. Sci. 61, 460-461.
Karunanithi K., Purushothaman M.R., Thiruvenkadan A.K., Singh G., Sadana D.K. and Murugan M. (2005). Breed characteristics of Mecheri sheep. Anim. Genet. Res. Info. 37, 53-62.
Manson J.L. (1996). A World Dictionary of Livestock Breeds, Types and Varieties. C.A.B. International, Site of Publication.
Nayak S., Sahu G. and Mohapatra A.K. (2008). Study on management practices, phenotypic and reproductive characteristics of Ganjam sheep under range conditions of Orissa. SAARC J. Agric. 6(2), 93-106.
Otoikhian C.S.O., Otoikhian A.M., Akporhuarho O.P. and Isidahoman C. (2008). Correlation of body weight and some body measurement parameters in Quda sheep under extensive management system. African J. Gen. Agric. 17, 129-133.
Prasad R.D.D., Madhava Rao T., Charyulu E.K. and Munirathnam D. (1990).Note on the prediction of body weights based on body measurements in Nellore sheep. Cheiron. 19, 275-277.
Ravimurugan T. and Devendran P. (2009). Body measurements and body weight of Ramnad White sheep. IndianJ. Small Rumin. 15, 266-267.
Ravimurugan T., Devendran P. and Joshi B.K. (2010). Distribution and characterization of Kilakarsal (Keezhakkaraisal) sheep. IndianJ. Small Rumin. 16, 122-124.
Ravimurugan T., Thanaeelaan V., Piramanayagam S. and Balachandran S. (2007). Effect of non genetic factors on birth weight and body measurements of Vembur lambs. Indian J. Small Rumin. 13, 100-102.
Salako A.E. and L.O. Ngere. (2002). Application of multifactorial discriminant analysis in the morphometric structural differentiation of the WAD and Yankusa sheep in the humid southwest Nigeria. Nig. J. Anim. Prod. 29, 163-167.
Slippers S.C., Letty B.A. and De Villiers J.F. (2000).Prediction of the body weight of Nguni goats. South African J. Anim. Sci. 30, 127-128.
Snedecor S.W. and Cochran W.G. (1989).Statistical Methods. 8^th Ed. Iowa State University Press, USA.
Wilson T.R. (1995). Livestock Production Systems: The Tropical Agriculturalist. Macmillan Education. Nairobi, Kenya.
Winrock International. (1992). Assessment of Animal Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Winrock Int. Inst. Agric. Dev. Monilton, Arkansas, USA.