Evaluation of Fertility and Calving Ease of Small Holder Indigenous Cattle Herds in Semi-Arid Zone of Nigeria

Subject Areas : Camel

G.N. Akpa ¹ , M.L. Umar ² , C. Alphonsus ³

1 - Department of Animal Science, AhmaduBello University, Zaria, Nigeria
2 - Jigawa Research Institute, Kazaure Jigawa State, Nigeria
3 - Department of Animal Science, AhmaduBello University, Zaria, Nigeria

Received: 2011-02-25 Accepted : 2011-05-06 Published : 2011-12-01

Keywords: Fertility, calving ease, smallholder cattle,

Abstract :

This study had the objective of determining the fertility and calving ease of small holder indigenous cattle herds inseminated with imported semen from proven sires. Sixty one indigenous cows of different breed origin (Bunaji, Sokoto Gudali and Rahaji) were selected from different herds across Jigawa state-Nigeria, and were used for this study. The selected dams were inseminated with semen from proven bulls of three exotic breed origin (Holstein-Friesian, Brown Swiss and Gwuzera) using artificial insemination technique. Pregnancy diagnosis was conducted by rectal palpation 40 days after insemination to ascertain the pregnant ones; those that were not pregnant were re-synchronized and inseminated. The number of inseminations per cow per conception was recorded.Calving ease was evaluated and coded in two classes; 1 (unassisted calving) and 2 (assisted calving) while calf survival was 0 if the calf died within 24 hours from birth and 1 otherwise. The results showed that 54% of the cows had normal calving while 46% were assisted. Amongst the assisted calving, 89% of the calves survived while 11% died. The age, parity and dam body condition had significant effect (P<0.01) on calving ease of the dams. Calving ease increased with age, parity and body condition of the dam. The sire breed origin had no significant (P>0.05) effect on the number of insemination per conception but significantly influenced gestation length. Dam breed origin significantly (P<0.05) influenced number of insemination per conception and gestation length. The sire-dam breed combination showed that Holstein-Friesian-WhitexFulani crosshad the lowest percentage of calving difficulty (17%) with 0 mortality, indicating the high compatibility of these two breed origins. However, Sokoto Gudali was more compatible with all the 3 exotic sire breed originHolstein friesian,Brown Swiss and Gwuzera studied with no mortality recorded. Therefore, results of this study on Bos taurus cattle and their crosses (Bos taurus xBos indicus) suggests that the Sokoto Gudali dams are much more compatible with all the three exotic sire breeds, (Brown Swiss,Holstien-Friesian andGwuzera)for crossbreeding purposes than White Fulani and Red Bororo dams.

References:

Adulli E.O.M. (1992). Dairy Performance of Friesian-Bunaji, Crosses and Their Growth to Yearling Age. M. Sc. Thesis, Ahmadu Bello University, ZariaNigeria.
Akpa G.N., Galadima M.A., Adeyinka, A.I., Malam-Adulli A.E.O. and Abdu S.B. (2007). Measures of daily weight gain in Friesian-Bunaji crossbred heifers and their relationship with first lactation milk yield. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 2,380-386.
Akpa G.N., Ifut O.J. and Mohammed F. (2002). Indegenous management of dystocia in ruminant livestock of northern quinea savanna of Nigeria. Nigerian. J. Anim Prod. 29, 264-270.
Allen D. (1990). Planned Beef Production and Marketing. BSP professional Books, British. Pp.199-201.
AndersonP. (1992). Minimizing calving difficulty in beef cattle. Extension Beef Cattle Specialist:7. http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/livestocksystems/ DI5778. html accedssed date on 9. Jan. 2009.
Barbara K., Nežika P. and Silvester Ž. (2009). Parameters affecting calving difficulty of Charolais and Limousin breeds at the Educational and Research Centre Logatec. Acta. Argic. Slovenica. 94(1), 27-31.
Buckley F., Sulliran K.O., Mee J.F., Evans R.D. and Dillon P. (2003). Relationship among milk yield, body condition score, weight and reproductionin spring-calved holstein friesian. J. Dairy Sci. 77, 867-873.
Cady R.A. (2004). Dystocia-difficult calving, what it costs and how to avoid it. University of New Hampshire. (11. Nov. 2008).
Ebangi A.L., Erasmus G.J., Mbah D.A., Tawah C.L. and Massine O. (2002). Factors affecting growth performance in purebred Gudah and two breed synthetic Wakwa beef cattle in a tropical environment. Med. Vet. Pays. Trop. 55,149-157.
Ehoche O.W., Malan-Adulli E. and Abubakar B.Y. (1992). Factors affecting birth weight and growth rate in Friesian x Bunaji calves. Nigerian. J. Anim. Sci. 6, 100 - 105.
FAO.(2008). Cattle Body Weight Fao. org. wairdocs/lLRl/x55522e/x5522eob. htm. accessed date on May 13, 2008.
Goyache F., Fernadex I., Alverez I., Royo L.J. and Gutienez J.P. (2002). Gestation length in the Australina De los valles. Beef cattle breed and its relationship with birth weight and calving ease. Arch. de zeotecnia. 196, 431-439.
Gwaza D.S., Okwori A.I., Abu A.H. and Fombah E.M. (2007). A retrospective study on reproductive and dairy performance of Holstein Frieisan on zero grazing in western highland regions of Cameroon. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. 19(4).
JRI. (2003). Summary of weather report condition in Jigawa state. Pp. 9-11.
Malau-Aduli A.E.O., Abubakar B.Y. and Dim N.T. (1993). Studies of milk production and growth of Friesian x Bunaji crosses. II growth to yearling age J. Anim. Prod. Res. 13, 53-61.
Mukasa-Mugerwa E.,Tegegne A. and Ketema H. (1992). Patterns of postpartum Oestrus on set and associated plasma progesterone profile in Bos indicus cattle in Ethiopia. J. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 24, 73-80.
Oni O.O., Buvanendaran V. and Dim N.I. (1988). The Influence of some environmental factors on growth rate of two Nigerian cattle breed and their hybrid with Charolian. J. Anim. Prod. Res. 8, 121-131.
Osei S.A., Eltah-Baale K. and Karikari P. (2004).The reproductive performance of Friesian cattle breed in the hot humid zone of Ghana. http: // www. fao. org. accedssed date on Aug. 1991.
Radostits O.M. (2001). Herd Health: Food Animal Production Medicine. 3^rd Ed Philadelphia. Pp. 255-289.
Radostis O.M., Leslie K.E. and Fetrow J. (1994). Herd Health. Food Animal Production Medicine. 2^nd Ed. London, Saunders Company: Pp 631.
Ritchie H.D. and AndersonP.T. (1990). Calving difficulty in Beef cattle Part 1. Beef Cattle Hand book BCH-2120.
Ritchie H.D. and AndersonP.T. (1992).Calving difficulty in beef cattle. MichiganBeef Production. Extension Bulletin e-1611. 5800, 1-8.
Roche J.F., Markey D. and Diskin M.D. (2000). Reproductive management of parsptum cows J. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 61, 703-712.
SAS. (1998). User’s Guide Statistics Version 6 Edition, SAS Institute. Inc. Carry N.C.
Shehu D.M., Olurunju S.A.S. and Oni O.O. (2005). Factors affecting the performances of Sokoto Gudali (biology) cattle from birth to yearling age. J. Trop. Biosci. 5, 81-85.
Shiferaw Y., Merga B. and Tesfu K. (2005). Reproductive disorders of crossbreed dairy cows in the central highlands of Ethiopia and their effect on reproductive performance. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 37, 427-441.
Stetshwaelo L.L. .and Adebambo A.O. (1992). Genetics Conservation of Domestic Livestock.Vol.2: Ed. Lawrence Anderson l Mres Bodo, CAB International, Wallingford. Pp. 87-102.
Tawah C.L., Mbah D.A., Enoh M.B. and Mcssinc O. (1999). Performance of Taurine x Gudali Zebu crosses subjected to artificial suckling in the tropical high lands Cameroon. Med. Vet. Pays Trop. 52, 65-70.
Vargas C.A., Elzo M.A., Chase C.C. and Olson T.A. (1999). Genetic parameters and relationships between hip height and weight in Brahman cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 78, 3045-3052.
Webster J. (1993). Understanding the Dairy Cow. Blackwell Scientific publications. London Edinburgh Boston 2^nd Ed. Pp. 288-333.
Yohannes A. and Azage T.K. (2001). Reproductive performance of cross breed dairy cows at Asella Livestock Research Station, Arsi, Ethiopia. Ethiopia. J. Anim. Prod.1(1), 1-12.