Self-recognition: The Achievement of Settlement Experience in Architecture Design Class

Subject Areas : architecture

Masoomeh Yaghoobi Sangherchi ¹ , Seyed Gholamreza Islami ²

1 - Ph.D., Department of Art and Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Associate Professor, School of Architecture, University College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran

Received: 2014-12-10 Accepted : 2015-05-04 Published : 2017-05-22

Keywords: Self-recognition, Architecture design, phenomenology, Symbolism, Settlement,

Abstract :

According to Islam theories, the major duty of human being is to recognize himself, which under this circumstance he would be able to know God too. Scrutinizing such a divine message, we come to this conclusion that human being can achieve the highest aim of creation while getting the knowledge and recognition of the world’s infinite intelligence. It is obvious that achievement to the greatest aim of creation must be parallel to human perfection. Self-recognition and self-identification are two important issues that should be more concerned by Iran educational system. From this point of view, the success of any subject of education must be evaluated and assessed in terms of this criterion that how high the educational system can realize the human being. Based on what is said, there arises a very particular question: what method of teaching and creation of architectural work can result in self-recognition as the intersection of science and art? As the problem raised in this research has been ignored by many researchers, we got right into the fields involved with the issue of awareness of human conscious such as humanistic psychology, symbolism and phenomenology. The culmination of this analysis is to recognize the fact that all these field, have the same principles and strategies. All these fields strongly focus on the fact that if human is honest toward himself and communicates with the surrounding phenomena in the same manner of dwelling, he can have access on a great part of his own identity. Based on these approaches, phenomena are not things we can see or touch, but they are half recognized in material worlds expecting for being realized completely by creatures. Observing the honesty and avoiding the domineering view can pave the way to achieve the non -visible part of these phenomena. According to scientists` view, human being can have self-recognition with honest communication resulting in growth and development of virtues. This type of self-recognition accompanied by cosmology occurs in daily life activities unconsciously when the human beings have a complete compatibility with the surrounding phenomena and has a dwelling relationship. The most important point is that the self- recognition is concomitant with constructions. Therefore, the architecture topic can be regarded as the most suitable and reliable realm of self-representation for creator and audience of architectural work. The research hypothesis has been formulated in such way. The settlement -based design can result in self-recognition. Settlement refers to a strategy which relies on horizontalism and prevention from domination on the self-reality and surrounding. Based on the practical experiences of this research, the trainee tries to recreate what he has touched several times and can love. The phenomenological analysis of this design method shows that the experience of humanistic moments in revealing the details of architectural spaces helps the trainee to remove the duality and contrast of innate feeling and reality of the material world in a compromise towards the unity. The trainee is the organizer of functional spaces and also involved in the thought architecture.

References:

1. ----------.(1385). قرآن مجید. (الهی قمشه ای، مترجم). تهران: گلی.
2. اسلامی، سید غلامرضا. (1392). د‌رس گفتار مبانی نظری د‌ر معماری؛ عینک‌هایمان را خود‌مان بسازیم. تهران: علم معمار رویال؛ فرهنگستان هنر جمهوری اسلامی ایران، پژوهشکد‌ه هنر.
3. اکبرى، فاطمه؛ و پورنامد‌اریان، تقی.(1390). رمز و تفاوت آن با نماد و نشانه. رشد آموزش زبان و اد‌ب فارسی، 3، 54-60.
4. باشلار،گاستن. (‌1387). بوطیقای فضا. (مریم کمالی و محمد شیربچه، مترجمان). تهران: روشنگران و مطالعات زنان.
5. پالاسما، یوهانی. (1392). د‌ست متفکر، حکمت وجود متجسد د‌ر معماری. (علی اکبری، مترجم). تهران: پرهام نقش.
6. پرتوی، پروین.( 1387). پد‌ید‌ارشناسی مکان. تهران: موسسه تألیف، ترجمه و نشر آثار هنری متن.
7. پناهی، سیامک؛‌ هاشم پور، رحیم؛ و اسلامی، سید غلامرضا. (1393). معماری اند‌یشه از اید‌ه تا کانسپت. هویت شهر،17، 25-34.
8. حبیب، فرح؛ ناد‌ری، سید مجید؛ و فروزان‌گهر، حمید‌ه. (1387). پرسمان تبعی د‌ر گفتمان کالبد شهر و هویت (کالبد شهر تابع هویت یا هویت شهر تابع کالبد شهر). هویت شهر، 3 ،13- 23.
9. حجت، عیسی؛ و انصاری، حمید‌رضا. (1392). ساختمان‌ها با من حرف می‌زنند. تهران: علم معمار رویال.
10. رجبی، محمد. ( 1378). هنر وحقیقت. مجموعه مقالات چیستی هنر، تهران: پژوهش‌های اسلامی رهبری د‌ر د‌انشگاه‌ها.
11.ستارى، جلال. (1372). مد‌خلى بر رمزشناسى عرفانى. تهران: نشر مرکز.
12. مد‌د‌پور، محمد. (1374). تجلیات حکمت معنوی د‌ر ساحت هنر، تهران: امیرکبیر.
13. نجف پور، رضا. (1388). نماد د‌ر قرآن. تهران: د‌انشگاه تهران.
14. نقی‌زاد‌ه، محمد. (1385)، معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی، اصفهان: انتشارات راهیان.

15. Allen, D. & M. Eliade (ed.). (1987). Phenomenology of Religion , Encyclopedia of Religion. New York: Macmillan.
16. Barrie, Th. (1996). Spiritual Path, Sacred Place: Myth, Ritual, and Meaning in Architecture .Boston & London: Shambhala Publications.
17. Heidegger, M. (2001). Poetry, Language, Thought. (A. Hofstadter. Transe). Harper Perennial. New York: Modern Classics
18. Maslow, A. (1987). Motivation and personality. Michigan: Pearson, Harper and Row. The University of Michigan.
19. Rogers, C. (1995). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. New York: Mariner Books.
20. Yaghoobi, S. M., & Islami, S,Gh (2014). Endogenous Development; an Alternative for De-escalation of Identity Crisis among Iranian Women. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development ,4(2), 89-98.