Assessment the Physical Components of Suburban Housing in Accordance with the Lifestyle of Immigrants
Subject Areas : architecture
Farzaneh Khoshsima
1
,
Vahid Ahmadi
2
*
,
Hero Farkisch
3
,
Toktam Hanaee
4
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor. Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
4 - Associate Professor, Department of Urbanism, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
Keywords: Physical architecture, Housing, Marginalized immigrants, Lifestyle, Immigrant community identity,
Abstract :
The concept of housing has historically been a means of meeting various human needs influenced by social, cultural, and economic changes. Consequently, the physical architecture of housing reflects the social and cultural elements that shape residents' lifestyles, rather than their individual preferences or construction standards. This is particularly crucial in suburban areas, where the response of housing to the lifestyles of immigrants carries double significance due to their diverse ethnicities, values, and lifestyles. The unique demands of immigrants necessitate tailored responses in housing. Unfortunately, the growing emphasis on expedited construction by developers, without consideration for the identity of immigrant communities, has led to a decline in housing quality and neglect of their needs. Therefore, addressing the lifestyle of immigrants through housing requires a thorough understanding of their identity, highlighting the need for careful investigation. This study aimed to address two key subject regarding the relationship between physical housing and the lifestyle of immigrants: first, understanding the factors influencing the Components of suburban areas and the lifestyle of immigrants, and second, relation between components. The study utilized an analytical-descriptive approach, beginning with extensive library research to gather and analyze a wide range of relevant literature. The study extracted and categorized the components of physical housing in suburban areas and the lifestyle of immigrants. Subsequently, interviews were conducted with 11 architectural and sociology specialists, and the data were analyzed using MAXQDA software to define the relationship between housing components and lifestyle. The findings indicate that family structure and occupation in the social realm, as well as ethnicity and beliefs in the cultural realm, are key dimensions influencing immigrants' housing preferences. Immigrants' social and cultural identities lead to varying housing demands, influenced by their level of integration into the host society. Social analysts suggest that housing patterns reflect immigrants' social identity, with family structure and occupation being shaped by the host society, impacting housing spatial organization and type on the city outskirts. The immigrant jobs in the city outskirts include both domestic and non-domestic roles. For domestic jobs, immigrants require separate spaces within their homes to work (spatial organization8). Conversely, non-domestic jobs often require space for work tools upon entry, aiming to create a feeling of home. Hence, the presence of a yard and the housing pattern become crucial (type and pattern of housing6). Considering the expansive family life of immigrants, the family structure prioritizes shared living with relative independence and privacy (spatial organization7 and type of housing7). Furthermore, immigrants' cultural identity influences spatial organization. In general, the spatial arrangement of their housing is influenced by the ethnicity and beliefs of the immigrants, which is inherent. Additionally, immigrants tend to select housing close to others of the same ethnicity. However, if this group disregards their concealed identity and only considers the customary identity, they may choose housing in any part of the city under societal influence. Hence, it can be inferred that within the perspectives of social and cultural theorists, a shared element known as "compliance" plays a significant role in shaping housing.
1- اسمی جوشقانی، زهرا. (۱۳۹۹). نگاهی به اهمیت سبکزندگی در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی. فصلنامه پژوهش در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی، 2(3) ، ۴۹-۳۷. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1634628167-10429-1400-28.pdf
2- اله دادی، نورالدین؛ و گودرزی، سعید. (۱۳۹8). هویت و سبک زندگی: تعیین بخشی سبکزندگی بر هویت قومی و ملی، تهران: اندیشه احسان. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11395872/
3- ایازی، رعنا؛ ارمغان، مريم؛ و خوانساری، شيدا. (1399). بررسی رابطه بين سبک زندگی و نظام اشيای خانگی از ديدگاه بورديو در مسکن معاصر (مطالعه موردی: زوج های جوان منطقه دو شهر قزوين). نشریه علوم و تکنولوژی محيط زيست، 22(10)، 162-177. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_17677_145bc0a9222a0aa99c60cea89b190fa1.pdf
4- آتشین صدف، عبدالرضا؛ و خیری، محمد. (1399). بررسی فلسفی رابطه سبک زندگی، پول و مد از منظر جورج زیمل. دوفصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی پژوهش نامه سبک زندگی، 6(10)، 51-67. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1607933963-10109-10-3.pdf
5- بایگانی، بهمن؛ ایراندوست، فهیم؛ و احمدی، سینا. (1392). سبک زندگی از منظر جامعهشناسی: مقدمهای بر شناخت و واکاوی مفهوم سبک زندگی. مهندسی فرهنگی، 8(77)، 56-74. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20140616142955-9430-88.pdf
6- افشاری، محسن؛ و پوردیهیمی، شهرام. (1395). مقیاسهای روش زندگی در مسکن. نشریه مسکن و محیط روستا، شماره 154، 16-3. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/6496e4be518be-10684-1400-75.pdf
7- توسلی، غلامعباس؛ و نورمرادی، سکینه. (1391). بررسی جامعهشناختی علل گستره آسیبهاي اجتماعی در بین حاشیهنشینهاي شهر تهران، مورد مطالعه منطقه چهار (خاك سفید). مجله علمی-پژوهشی مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران، 4(3)، 65-79.
https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_1867_131a964775ba2b2d8ceae127bd503895.pdf
8- خورسندی، آتنا؛ ارسطو، بهروز؛ و صناعی، رضا. (1398). بررسی شاخصهای کالبدی مسکن در توسعه سکونتگاههای شهری با استفاده از سیستم اطلاعات مکانی (مطالعه موردی شهر سمنان). کاربرد سیستم اطلاعات جغرافیایی و سنجش از دور در برنامهریزی، 10(3)، 1-17. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1587555536-10207-98-3-3.pdf
9- رحیمی، لیلا؛ و عزیزی، طیبه. (1396). بررسی ارتباط بین کیفیت کالبدی مسکن و شاخصهای امنیت تصرف در مناطق حاشیهنشین (موردشناسی: محله وکیل آباد شهر ارومیه). جغرافیا و آمایش شهری-منطقهای، 7(25)، 203-222. https://gaij.usb.ac.ir/article_3485_714467813a84a6cf1f5aa6f76a60cdb8.pdf
10- رشیدی طاشکوئی، احمد. (۱۳۹۸). هزینه های سربار حاشیهنشینی و مدیریت شهری. تهران: انتشارات سنجش و دانش. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11553478/
11- زارع شهامتی، مهسا؛ صحراگرد منفرد، ندا؛ و یزدانفر، سید عباس. (1402). شناسایی و اولویتبندی راهکارهای مسکن انعطافپذیر منطبق با سبکزندگی (مطالعه موردی: استان تهران)، مجله هویت شهر، 17(1)، 49-62. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_21030_57b038353ffc6e1cad43b7152ddf77aa.pdf
12- زرافشانی، محمدعلی؛ طهماسبی، ارسلان؛ و بایزدی، قادر. (1400). بررسی آموزش معماری در دانشگاه های ایران در راستای حل بحران هویت معماری معاصر ایران. نشریه مطالعات هنر اسلامی، 18(42)، 175-187. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/1649233223-10339-42-11.pdf
13- غروی الخوانساری، مریم. (1400). واکاوی ریشه های تحول و نقد دوره دوم آموزش معماری در دانشکده هنرهای زیبا (1348-1359). نشریه هنرهای زیبا - معماری و شهرسازی، 26(1)، 57-68. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_81460_64d34c3b1e86f3609a7ebf36fca30540.pdf
14- فدایی، مهدی. (1395). نسبت «سبک زندگی» و «معنای زندگی» در اندیشه آلفرد آدلر. دوفصلنامه پژوهشنامه سبک زندگی، 2(3)، 65-76. https://journal.manaviyat.ir/article_43957_eaf6a902d6fbf31f5804811b61900f5b.pdf
15- گیدنز، آنتونی. (1398). گزیده جامعهشناسی. (حسن چاووشیان، مترجم). تهران: نشر نی. https://www.bennubook.com/book/119977/
16- نورائی، سمیه؛ فرکیش، هیرو؛ میرزاکوچک خوشنویس، احمد؛ تاجی، محمد؛ و مرادی نسب، حسین. (1400). تبیین مؤلفههای امرنمایشی در نسبت با فرهنگ و معماری (مبتنی بر آراء اندیشمندان انتقادی و غیرانتقادی). مجله هویت شهر، 15(2)، 59-68. https://journals.srbiau.ac.ir/article_15155_ba02360d3cd62a4ef18eb11efc5fff84.pdf
17- A. M. Al Husban, S., A. S. Al Husban, A., & Al Betawi, Y. (2021). The Impact of the Cultural Beliefs on Forming and Designing Spatial Organizations, Spaces Hierarchy, and Privacy of Detached Houses and Apartments in Jordan. Space and Culture, 24(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218791934.
18- Amit, K., & Dolberg, P. (2023). Who do you think I am? Immigrant’s first name and their perceived identity. Comparative Migration Studies, 11(6), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-023-00328-1.
19- Antunano, E. (2020). From the “Horseshoe of Slums” to Colonias Proletarias: The Transformation of Mexico City’s ‘Housing Problem', 1930-1960. Comparativ, 30(1/2), 10-19. doi: 10.26014/j.comp.2020.01-02.06.
20- Awadelkarim, K.M. (2022). Towards Contemporary Traditional Housing Architecture: Investigating the Relationship between Culture and Traditional Housing Architecture in Aburouf. Faculty of Engineering and Technology: Selinus University of Sciences and Literature. https://www.uniselinus.education/sites/default/files/2022-10/Khalid%20S.%20Mohammed%20Awadelkarim.pdf
21- bahmani, S., hemati, R., moltafet, H., & Izadi jairan, A. (2019). Systematic Review of Studies on Slums (1996-2017). Social Welfare Quarterly, 18(71), 85-134. DOI:10.29252/refahj.18.71.3.
22- BATU, M., S. KOHNEHSHAHRI, F., & VARIŞLI, B. (2023). Iranian Migrants’ Perceptions of Turkish and Iranian Culture: A Comparative Analysis with ZMET Technique. Turkish Review of Communication Studies, 42, 103-122. DOI: 10.17829/turcom.1122465.
23- Beamish, J., Carucci Goss, R., & Emmel, J. (2015). Lifestyle Influences on Housing Preferences. Housing and Society, ISSN: 0888-2746, 28(1), DOI: 10.1080/08882746.2001.11430459.
24- Bogorad, L., Ducker, A., Koch, C., & et al. (2016). Housing in the Evolving American Suburb. Washington: Urban Land Institute. https://uli.org/wp-content/uploads/ULI-Documents/Housing-in-the-Evolving-American-Suburb.pdf
25- Brivio, F., & Vigano, A., & Paterna, A., & Palena, N., & Greco, A. (2023). Narrative Review and Analysis of the Use of “Lifestyle” in Health Psychology. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 1-18. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054427.
26- Buffon, L.G. (1872). Discours Prononce a l’Academie Française Par M. De Buffon Le Jour de Sa Reception Le 25 Aout 1753; J. Lecoffre: Paris, France. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k937176g.
27- Carling, J., Czaika, M., & Erdal, M. B. (2020). Translating migration theory into empirical propositions. Seven European Migration Research Institutes: QuantMig Project Deliverable 1.2. https://www.quantmig.eu/res/files/QuantMig%20D1.2%20v1.1.pdf
28- Chandra, M.S., Nandapala, K., Weerasinghe, B., & Priyadarshana, G. (2020). An engineering approach towards the traditional beliefs in house construction. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(2), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42107-019-00215-0.
29- Chen, H., Zhu, Z., Chang, J., & Gao, Y. (2020). The effects of social integration and hometown identity on the life satisfaction of Chinese rural migrants. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(171), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01415-y.
30- Coolen, H., & Ozaki, R. (2004). Culture, Lifestyle and the Meaning of a Dwelling, Research Institute for Housing. Urban and Mobility Studies Delft University of Technology. International Conference Adequate & Affordable Housing For All. (pp.1-14). University of Technology. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228482710.
31- Cormos, V.C. (2022). The Processes of Adaptation, Assimilation and Integration in the Country of Migration: A Psychosocial Perspective on Place Identity Changes. Sustainability, 14(16), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610296.
32- De. Haas, H. (2021). A theory of migration: the aspirations-capabilities framework. Comparative Migration Studies, 9, 1-35. doi: 10.1186/s40878-020-00210-4.
33- Featherstone, M. (1991). Consunier Culture & Postmodernismn. London: Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/consumer-culture-and-postmodernism/book227648.
34- Giddens, A., Duneier, M., & P.Appelbaum, R. (2021). Introduction to Sociology, (12th Edition). New York: Norton. https://assets.openstax.org/oscms-prodcms/media/documents/IntroductiontoSociology3e-WEB_9QTqRGQ.pdf
35- Hojat, I., & Fallah, E. (2018). Family structure and housing Investigating the effect of family structure changes on houses' spatial organization (A case study of the houses of Yazd). Int. J. Architect. Eng. Urban Plan, 28(2), 149-162. DOI: 10.22068/ijaup.28.2.149.
36- Iskander, N., & B Landau, L. (2022). The centre cannot hold: Arrival, margins, and the politics of ambivalence introduction to ‘arrival at the margins’, a special issue of migration studies. MIGRATION STUDIES, 10, 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac018.
37- Jafaria, A., & Zabihi, H. (2021). The Effect of Culture on The Vernacular Houses in Northern Iran; Case Studies: Vernacular Houses in Babol and Babolsar. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 14(35). DOI: 10.22034/AAUD.2020.179004.1856.
38- Jansen, S.J.T. (2020). Urban, suburban or rural? Understanding preferences for the residential environment. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 13(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2020.1726797.
39- Jayasudha, P., & Marcel Nisha, T. (2016). Cultural Expressions In Architecture – A Case Of Manapad In The Coastal Stretch Of Tuticorin. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE), 13(5), 14-20. DOI:10.9790/1684-1305031420.
40- KELLY, T. (2021). EVOLUTION OF THE TRADITIONAL TURKISH HOUSE. Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XVII PI-63, WIT Transactions on The Built Environment, 203, 1-13. https://www.witpress.com/Secure/elibrary/papers/STR21/STR21006FU1.pdf
41- Kirtiklis, K. (2017). Manuel Castells theory of information society as media theory. LINGUA POSNANIENSIS, 1, 65-77. DOI:10.1515/linpo-2017-0006.
42- Kurtz, D.V. (2014). Culture, poverty, politics: Cultural sociologists, Oscar Lewis, Antonio Gramsci. Critique of Anthropology, 34(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X14530577.
43- Malecka, A., Mitręga, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2022). Segmentation of collaborative consumption consumers: Social identity theory perspective. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46, 2445 – 2465. DOI:10.1111/ijcs.12798.
44- Mehri, S., Soheili, J., & Zabihi, H. (2020). The Impact of Lifestyle on Spatial Relations of Aristocratic Qajar Houses in Mazandaran and Golestan. Space Ontology International Journal, 9, 47- 64. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Article/938400.
45- Minneapolis, M.E. (2016). Communication in the Real World An Introduction to Communication Studies, USA: Minnesota. https://open.umn.edu/opentextbooks/textbooks/274.
46- Morrison, P.S., & McMurray, S. (1999). The Inner-city Apartment versus the Suburb: Housing Sub-markets in a New Zealand City. Urban Studies, 36(2), 377-397. DOI: 10.1080/0042098993655.
47- Niazi, M., Afra, H., Nejadi, A., & Sakhaei, A. (2019). Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Cultural Capital and Lifestyle. Journal of Applied Sociology, 29, 1-20. https://journals.ui.ac.ir/article_22741_e907c67c6afd5bb2f92e88ad0e9f79a5.pdf.
48- Ormerod, R. (2020). The history and ideas of sociological functionalism: Talcott Parsons, modern sociological theory, and the relevance for OR. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, 71(12), 1873-1899. doi:10.1080/01605682.2019.1640590.
49- OZTURK, S. (2020). PIERRE BOURDIEU’S THEORY OF SOCIAL ACTION. HABITUS Toplumbilim Dergisi HABITUS Journal of Sociology, 1, 63-78. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1197965.
50- Pasta, F. (2020). What we learned from John F. C. Turner about the informal city. Domus MAGAZINE. https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/gallery/2020/03/10/what-we-learned-from-john-f-c-turner-about-the-informal city.html.
51- Peng, J., Strijker, D., & Wu, Q. (2020). Place Identity: How Far Have We Come in Exploring Its Meanings?. Front. Psychol, 11(294), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00294.
52- Shafipour Yourdshahi, P., Kiani, M., Hamzeloo, S., & Moazemi, M. (2023). The Influence of "Culture from Rappaport's Viewpoint" on "Mental Image" and Examining the Role of this Influence on the Formation of the Environment. ARMANSHAHR Architecture & Urban Development, 15, 103-118. DOI: 10.22034/AAUD.2023.294858.2508.
53- Simmel, G. (2020). Georg Simmel: Essays on Art and Aesthetics, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://www.publiarq.com/libros/george-simmel-essays-on-art-and-aesthetics/978-0-226-62109-8/.
54- UYAR, G., & GRIFFITHS, S. (2017). A CONFIGURATIONAL APPROACH TO VERNACULAR DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE ‘Traditional’ Houses in Turkey, Japan and Britain. Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium. January, (1-16). Portugal: Departamento de Engenharia Civil. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321001662.
55- Varmaghani, H., & Soltanzadeh, H. (2020). Analysis of lifestyle and Types of Rural Housing in the Historical Geography of Mazandaran (19th and 20th centuries). Int. J. Architect. Eng. Urban Plan, 30(2), 222-235. DOI: 10.22068/ijaup.30.2.222.
56- Verkuyten, M., Wiley, S., Deaux, K., & Fleischmann, F. (2019). To Be Both (and More): Immigration and Identity Multiplicity. Journal of Social Issues, 75(2), 390-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12324.
57- Wilska, T.A. (2002). Consumption, Identities and Lifestyles in Today's Finland. Acta Sociologica, 45(3), 195-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4194930.
58- Zarrabi, M., Yazdanfar, S.A., & Hosseini, S.B. (2021). Systematic Review of Research Trends in Lifes tyle and Housing. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, 11(4), 5-16. DOI: 10.30495/IJAUD.2021.17398