Evaluation of Thermal Comfort Zone in Naturally Ventilated Offices in Bushehr

Subject Areas : architecture

Roza Vakilinezhad ¹ , Jalil Shaeri ²

1 - Assistant Professor, Department Of Art And Architecture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
2 - Ph.d, candidate, faculty of art and architecture, Tarbiat Modares university, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2018-06-10 Accepted : 2019-09-16 Published : 2020-12-21

Keywords: Thermal Comfort, Bushehr, Natural ventilation, office building,

Abstract :

Providing thermal comfort is one of the most important goals in building design, which accounts for a large amount of energy consumption. In-office buildings, thermal comfort has a significant impact on indoor quality and staff productivity. In many countries, several methods and standards have been proposed to determine the thermal comfort zone for air conditioning and naturally ventilated buildings. In Iran, the lack of appropriate standards defining thermal comfort zones determines the necessity of research in this field. The present paper aims to determine the thermal comfort range in Bushehr office buildings with natural ventilation. Environmental indices (temperature, humidity, wind speed) were measured through field studies using data loggers in the three days from 19 to 21 March while 180 questionnaires were answered simultaneously by users. Based on the results, 81.1% of the subjects are comfortable with the overall thermal conditions. Using SPSS software, descriptive statistics analysis was performed between measured data and individual responses. During the research time in March, the average temperature is 19 ° C and the relative humidity is 65%. In this way, the comfort range is calculated based on two proposed equations for thermal comfort in different cities of Iran and compared with field measurements. According to the results of high temperature, the comfort zone in Bushehr office spaces is 28.6 degrees Celsius which is higher than the values from proposed equations for thermal comfort in Iran. There is a difference of 1.13 degrees between the neutral temperatures obtained by the two methods. More than 79% of the people are satisfied with the flow of air while 63% of the moisture content is satisfied. This shows the greater importance of the airflow in creating a feeling of comfort on the amount of moisture. In the case of thermal preference, 40% of people do not want a change in temperature, and 51.6% prefer small changes. In the case of humidity, 63.2% of the moisture conditions are satisfied and their 45% tendency to no change in moisture conditions. While 47.8% of people preferred modest changes in humidity (slightly damp or slightly moist), 32.4% prefer the environment without changing the airflow, and 52% prefer the air to more or more. Thus, despite the establishment of comfort conditions, the thermal preference for more than 36% of people is slightly lower and 17% less humidity and 52% more airflow. Regarding heat sensation and thermal preference, a suitable solution can be selected for flexible space design. The results of the questionnaires and the evaluation of behavioral parameters showed that the most important choice of the individuals to adapt to the thermal conditions is to stay in places with the possibility of wind flow. This issue shows the importance of the application of natural ventilation and its feasibility in space design. Therefore, to accurately determine the exact range of thermal comfort in Bushehr city, it is necessary to conduct extensive field study research in different seasons of the year in natural building ventilation buildings defining accurate thermal comfort zone.

References:

انصاری منش، مریم؛ و نصرالهی، نازنین. (1393). تعیین محدوده آسایش حرارتی ساکنان به‌منظور بهینه‌سازی کیفیت محیط داخل در ساختمان‌های اداری کرمانشاه. نقش‌جهان، 2(4)، 11–21.

بهزاد فر، مصطفی؛ و منعام، علیرضا. (1393). تأثیر ضریب دید به آسمان در آسایش حرارتی کاربران فضای باز شهری، بررسی بوستان‌های منتخب شهر تهران. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان‌شهر، 5(3)، 23–34.

حسینی، سید ابراهیم؛ شعبانی، سیده حمیده؛ عباسیان، غزاله؛ و بلانیان، ندا. (1393). بررسی تأثیر عوامل میکرواقلیم بر آسایش محیطی فضاهای پیاده شهری (نمونه موردی: بررسی آسایش حرارتی در خیابان شهرداری تهران، حدفاصل میدان تجریش تا میدان قدس)، مطالعات مدیریت شهری، 19(6)، 1–15.

حیدری، شاهین. (1393). سازگاری حرارتی در معماری نخستین قدم در صرفه‌جویی مصرف انرژی. تهران: دانشگاه تهران.

نجفی، سیدمحمدعلی؛ و نجفی، نجمه. (1391). بررسی آسایش حرارتی با استفاده از روش‌های PMV و PPD، مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، 1(1)، 61–70.

وکیلی‌نژاد، رزا. (1392). تأثیرترکیبیویژگی‌هایکالبدیپوستهبناوالگوهای تهویهبرمیزانمصرفانرژیدرساختمان‌های مسکونی (نمونهموردیساختمان‌هایتهویهیک‌طرفهدراقلیمگرمو خشکشیراز). پایان‌نامه دکتری، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران.

ASHRAE. (2004). Standard 55-2004:Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. Atlanta:Author.

ASHRAE. (2010). ASHRAE 55-Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. Atlanta:Author.

Auliciems, A., & De Dear, R. (1998). Thermal adaptation and variable indoor climate control In A. Auliciems (Ed.), Human Bioclimatology Advances in Bioclimatology (Vol.5, pp. 61–86). Berlin: Springer.

Auliciems, A., & Szokolay, S.V. (1997). Thermal comfort In A. Auliciems (Ed.), PLEA notes: Passive and Low Energy Architecture International Design tools and techniques thermal (Vol.5, pp. 1–66). Brisbane: University of Queensland.

Barbadilla-Martín, E., Lissen, JMS., Guadix Martín, JG., Aparicio-Ruiz, P., & Brotas, L. (2017). Field study on adaptive thermal comfort in mixed mode office buildings in southwestern area of Spain. Building and Environment, 123, 163-175.

Busch, J.F. (1992). A tale of two populations: thermal comfort in air-conditioned and naturally ventilated offices in Thailand. Energy and Buildings, 18 (3–4), 235–249.

de Dear, R.J. (1998). A global database of thermal comfort field experiments. ASHRAE Transactions, 104, 1141-1152.

de Dear, R.J., & Brager, G.S. (2002). Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated buildings: revisions to ASHRAE Standard 55. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 549–561.

Djongyang, N., Tchinda, R., & Njomo, D. (2010). Thermal comfort: A review paper. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(9), 2626–2640.

Ghiaus, C., & Allard, F. (2006). Potential for free-cooling by ventilation. Solar Energy, 80(4), 402–413.

Indraganti, M., Ooka, R., Rijal, H., & Brager, G. (2014). Adaptive model of thermal comfort for offices in hot and humid climates of India. Building and Environment, 74, 39-53.

Luo, Z., Zhao, J., Gao, J., & He, L. (2007). Estimating natural-ventilation potential considering both thermal comfort and IAQ issues. Building and Environment, 42(6), 2289–2298.

Luo, M., Cao, B., & Damiens, J. (2015). Evaluating thermal comfort in mixed-mode buildings: A field study in a subtropical climate. Building and Environment, 88, 46-54.

Lu, S., Pang, B., Qi, Y., & Fang, K. (2018). Field study of thermal comfort in non-air-conditioned buildings in a tropical island climate. Applied Ergonomics, 66, 89-97.

Mishra, A.K., & Ramgopal, M. (2013). Field studies on human thermal comfort: An overview. Building and Environment, 64, 94-106.

Mishra, A.K., & Ramgopal, M. (2015). A thermal comfort field study of naturally ventilated classrooms in Kharagpur, India. Building and Environment, 92, 396-406.

Mishra. A.K., Derks, M.T.H., Kooi, L., Loomans, M.G.L.C., & Kort, H.S.M. (2017). Analysing thermal comfort perception of students through the class hour, during heating season, in a university classroom. Building and Environment, 125, 464-474.

Nicol, F. (2004). Adaptive thermal comfort standards in the hot–humid tropics. Energy and Buildings, 36(7), 628–637.

Nicol, F., & Roaf, S. (1996). Pioneering new indoor temperature standards: the Pakistan project. Energy and Buildings, 23(3), 169–174.

Nicol, J., & Humphreys, M. A. (1973). Thermal comfort as part of a self-regulating system. Building Research and Practice, 1(3), 174–179.

Olesen, B.W., & Brager, G.S. (2004). A better way to predict comfort: The new ASHRAE standard 55-2004. ASHRAE Journal, 46, 20–26.

Olesen, B.W., & Parsons, K.C. (2002). Introduction to thermal comfort standards and to the proposed new version of EN ISO 7730. Energy and Buildings, 34(6), 537–548.

Orosa, J.A., & Oliveira, A.C. (2011). Passive methods to address the sick building syndrome in public buildings. In S.A. Abdul-Wahab (Ed.), Sick Building Syndrome (pp. 481–492). Muscat: Springer.

Rupp, R.F., Vásquez, N.G., & Lamberts, R. (2015). A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment. Energy and Buildings, 105, 178–205.

Singh, M.K., Ooka, R., Rijal, H., & Takasu, M., (2017). Adaptive thermal comfort in the offices of North-East India in autumn season. Building and Environment, 124, 14-30.

Van Hoof, J., Mazej, M., & Hensen, J.L.M. (2010). Thermal comfort: research and practice. Frontiers in Bioscience, 15(2), 765–788.

Yu, W., Li, B., & Yao, R.(2017). A study of thermal comfort in residential buildings on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Building and Environment, 119, 71-86.

Thermal Comfort, Office Building, Natural Ventilation, Bushehr