The Evolution of Government Discourse in the Constitutional Era and Reza Shah: A Reverse Process

Subject Areas : Epistemological and methodological researcher of historical research

Mojtaba Hoseyni ¹ , Fereydoun Akbarzadeh ² , Hamed Ameri Golestani ³ , Rohollah Shahabi ⁴

1 - Department of Political Sciences, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
2 - Department of Political Sciences, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
3 - Department of Political Sciences, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
4 - Department of Political Sciences, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran

Received: 2020-07-28 Accepted : 2020-09-14 Published : 2020-08-22

Keywords: Reza Shah, Regular Independent Government, Constitutional Government, Absolute Government, Nasserit Era,

Abstract :

The government was one of the most important institutions in the contemporary history of Iran, which was considered in the discourse of modernity, and its transformation soon occupied the minds of Iranian modernists. The first attempts to change it were formulated by Malcolm Khan during the reign of Nasser al-Din Shah with the discourse of "orderly independent state" and did not succeed and remained as planned, but the idea remained that one could not modernize without a strong government. This idea also entered the constitutional discourse, and although the constitution sought to limit the state, it had in its heart the idea of ​​a powerful state, and with its inability to create it, and the turmoil that arose after the constitution, Reza Shah's absolute government over It worked, which was the reverse process of creating an absolute state. Considering the discourse method, this article seeks to address the question of why the process of state transformation in this period was reversed and the absolute state emerged after the pre-constitutional period, and the most important result is that One is the imperfection of the new state-building process in the Nasserite era, and the other is the inability of constitutionalism in state-building, despite its tools, including the constitution, to be the reasons for this reverse process.