Windthrow Effects on Biodiversity of Natural Forest Ecosystem in Local Scale
Subject Areas : Water and Environment
yahya
Kooch
1
(Department of Forestry, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Iran. (Corresponding author))
seyed mohsen
Hosseini
2
(Department of Forestry, Tarbiat Modarres University, Tehran Iran.)
jahangard
Mohammadi
3
(Department of Soil Sciences, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord Iran)
seyeid mohammad
Hojjati
4
(Department of Forestry, Sari University, Sari, Iran)
Keywords: Canopy gap, pit, mound, diversity plant, richness, evenness,
Abstract :
Windthrow in forest ecosystems is due to different microsites creation that can be effective on biodiversity of plant elements. Canopy gaps and pit – mounds (PMs) creation are the most common microsites.Current reseach was considered to investigate of the effect of these microsites on diversity, richness and evenness parameters. For this purpose, twenty hectare areas considered in the Tarbiat Modares University Experimental Forest Station that is located in Mazandaran province, northern Iran. Twenty one canopy gaps with thirty four uprooted trees were found in these areas. Line transect method was used for sampling and plant abundances were also recorded in canopy gaps. Circles plots with radius of 4 meter in intersection of PMs and 20 - 30 meter distance far from PM position were designed for recording cover percent of herbaceous plants. The diversity parameters were significantly different in canopy gaps areas. Biodiversity indices amounts had ascending trend with increasing of canopy gaps areas. PMs were significantly effective on diversity parameters also. Diversity and evenness indices showed significantly increasing on PMs position.Richness was increased on PMs, but no significant statistically difference was considered. The obtained results are indicating windthrow is effective on plant community's dynamics, which should be considered in forest management
1-Scharenborch, B. C., Bockeim, J. G., 2007. Pedodiversity in an old – growth northern hardwood forest in the HuronMountain, Upper Peninsula, Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Vol. 37, pp. 1106 – 1117.
2-Samonil, P., Antolik, L., Svoboda, M., Adam, D., 2009. Dynamics of wind throw events in a natural fir – beech forest in the Carpathian Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 257, pp. 1148 – 1156.
3-Ulanova, N. G., 2000. The effects of wind throw on forests at different spatial scales: a review. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 135, pp. 155 – 167.
4-Peterson, C. J., 2007. Consistent influence of tree diameter and species on damage in nine eastern North America tornado blowdowns. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 250, pp. 96 - 106.
5-McAlister, S. D., Malmer, M. W., Arevalo, J. R., DeCoster, J. K., 2000. Species composition on tip up mounds and pits created by catastrophic windthrow in a Minnesota forest. Proceeding IAVS Symposium, pp.104 – 107.
6-Oheimb, G., Friedel, A., Bertsch, A., Hardtle, W., 2007. The effect of windthrow on plant species richness in a Central European beech forest. Plant Ecology, Vol. 191, pp. 47 – 65.
7-Phillips, J., Marion, D. A., Turkington, A. V., 2008. Pedologic and geomorphic impacts of a tornado blowdown event in a mixed pine – hardwood forest. Catena, Vol. 75, pp. 278 – 287.
8-Kooch, Y., Hosseini, S. M., Mohammadi, J., Hojjati, S. M., 2010. The effects of gap disturbance on soil chemical and biochemical properties in a mixed beech – hornbeam forest of Iran. Ecologia Balkanica Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 39 – 56.
9- مصداقی، منصور، " توصیف و تحلیل پوشش گیاهی"، انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، 1380.
10-Kooch, Y., Hosseini, S. M., Akbarinia, M., 2008. The ecological effects of pit and mounds created by a windthrow on understory of hyrcanian forests. Silva Balcanica Journal, Vol. 9, pp.13 – 28.
11-Waite, S. 2000. Statistical ecology in practice: A guide to analyzing environmental and ecological field data.
12-Nilsson, M. C., Wardle, D. A., 2005. Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front. Ecol. Environ., Vol. 3, pp. 421 – 428.
13-Anderson, K. L., Leopold, D. J., 2002. The role of canopy gaps in maintaining vascular plant diversity at a forsested wetland in New YorkState. J. Torry Bot. Soc., Vol. 129, pp.238 – 250.
14-Harper, K. A. Macdonald, S. E., 2002. Structure and composition of edges next to regenerating clear cuts in mixed wood boreal forest. Journal of Vegetation Sciences, Vol. 13, pp. 533 – 546.
15-Felton, A. M., Wood, J., Lindenmayer, D. B., 2006. Vegetation structure, phenology and regeneration in the natural and anthropogenic tree fall gaps of a reduced – impact logged subtropical Bolivian forest. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 235, pp. 186 – 193.
16-McNab, H. W., Greenberg, C. H., Berg, E. C., 2004. Landscape distribution and characteristics of large hurricanerelated canopy gaps in a Southern Appalachian watershed. Forest Ecology and Management, Vol. 196, pp. 435 – 447.
17-Elliott, K. J., Hitchcock, S. L., Krueger, L., 2002. Vegetation response to large scale disturbance in a Southern Appalachian forest: hurricane opal and salvage logging. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society, Vol.129, pp. 48 – 59.
18-Cooper – Ellis, S., Foster, D. R., Carlton, G., Lezberg, A., 1999. Forest response to catastrophic wind: results from an experimental hurricane. Journal of Ecology, Vol. 80, pp. 2683 – 2696.