Evaluation and comparative compare PTW system performance in an offshore oil platform

Subject Areas : Water and Environment

Hossein Mirderikvand ¹ , Parvin Nassiri ² , Nabiollah Mansouri ³

1 - MSc HSE Management, Department of Environmental and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Safety Expert National Iranian Oil Company
2 - PHD, School of Public Health, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3 - PHD, Department of Environmental and Energy, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Science and Research, Iran

Received: 2011-04-20 Accepted : 2011-11-11 Published : 2011-12-22

Keywords: Permit to Work System, Risk Assessment, audit and performance evaluati,

Abstract :

Introduction: Permit to Work (PTW) is a documented system in order to provide Written Instructions and Formally agreement to the personnel carrying out the hazardous job, or a defined job in a hazardous environment, or both. PTW is necessary to safeguard personnel doing the work, safeguard others on the Installation, safeguard the Installation and the environment and comply with Company Standards; therefore, performance evaluation of PTW System to identify weaknesses and improve its function is important. The main objective of the present study is evaluation and comparative compare PTW System performance in an offshore oil platform. Method and Materials: In this study, PTW system Audit performed in the studied oil platform by SHELL’S Company check lists (Level 4/3/2 Audits). Quality results obtained from checklists divided into six categories, then In order to evaluate the studied PTW System the results of six categories above were scoring based on HSE-UK Scoring Mechanism. Results: The results from audit showednoncompliance in PTW System at the following elements: risk assessment, training for permit Signatories, supporting documents, Hazardous Area Classification, monitoring and auditing systems and updated laws and regulations. Conclusion: Acquired score average 1.5 of 5, indicated that there is a significant gap between the exiting work permit with a work permit of SHELL Oil Company. Review of the PTW System by audit checklists indicated remarkably defects in all categories including: training, qualifications, PTW forms, coordination, monitoring and isolation system; Finally PTW system in studied oil platform was in very lower level than the permit system of SHELL Oil Company. Our findings from study indicate existing PTW System not effective in risk control at offshore installations and a new PTW system must be plane that contained the correction actions in the above categories.

References:

1.  Permit to Work Manual, 2003 Shell Exploration BV, Soroosh/Nowrooz Integrated Field Development Project, Document No: NS/OOP/PR/PR/GOXX/01512/G4


2.  American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AICHE). Permit to Work   system, Second Edition, 293-300,2000


3. Butler JD and Booth Michael. A new Approach to Permit to Work System Offshore. 1992. Safety Science, 309-326


4. Lord Cullen. Hon,Nouember 1990, The public  into the piper Alpha Disaster


5. B.S.Lee and W.S.McMillan, a knowledge based system for offshore Permit to Work management, Proceedings of the Second (1992) International Offshore and  polar Engineering Conference San Francisco, USA, 14-19 June 1992


6.  Lees FP. Loss Preventions in The Process Industries, 1996, Reed Eeed Educational and Professional Publishing LTD, 21/5-21/21 Vol.2, Category 2


7. قهرمانی ابوالفضل،1386، تجزیه و تحلیل میزان انطباق سیستم صدور مجوزکاری با معیار های استاندارد در یک شر کت بهره برداری نفت و گاز، فصلنامه سلامت کار ایران، دوره4،شماره 1و2
   
   
   1. Guideline on Permit to Work (P.T.W) systems, Report no.6.29/189 January 1993.
      
      
      1. Vicky Scotney, Amey Vecttra Limited, 2000 “Development of a Health and Safety Performance Measurement Tool”, Health and Safety Executives
      
      
      2. kletz Trevor  " Learning from accidents" third edition, Gulf professional publishing 2001 chapter 17 page 196-207