Investigating the economic value of water in environmental, agricultural and industrial uses (Case Study: Urmia Lake Watershed)
Subject Areas :
Water and Environment
Sayed Morteza Mousavi
1
,
Mahdi Sarai Tabrizi
2
,
Hossein Talachi Langeroudi
3
1 - -Ph.D. Student of Water Resources, Department of Water Engineering and Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 - Assisstant Professor, Department of Water Engineering and Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounts
Received: 2020-03-02
Accepted : 2021-04-10
Published : 2021-09-23
Keywords:
SEEA Guidelines,
Environmental Need,
Water management,
Water Market,
Agricultural Economic,
Abstract :
Background and Purpose: Today, social, economic and environmental capital are measured as the main components of development simultaneously. Lack of comprehensiveness of programs creates various problems and issues, especially from environmental aspects after implementation. Degradation of environmental conditions will have negative effects and damage even on economic and social values in the region and its affected area. The purpose of this study is to investigate the economic value of water in environmental, agricultural and industrial uses in the catchment area of Lake Urmia.
Material and Methodology: Optimal allocation of production inputs at the macro level of decision-making is one of the requirements for achieving productivity growth. On the other hand, optimal allocation also requires an efficient market to explain the economic values of production entities. In this study, due to the limitation of water resources, in response to water demands for the use of different competitors using the United Nations Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting (SEEA[1]) guidelines, it has been attempted to use the information available in Evaluation of the economic value (production value) of water in the Urmia Lake watershed in order to reflect the economic value of ecosystem services in decision making and water sharing appropriately.
Results: According to estimates, the economic value of water in agriculture is 6045, in industrial use is 33342 and in environment is 24235 Rail’s per cubic meter. Consequently, compliance with the principles of sustainability and economic values of water dictates that even if water demand in the agricultural sector is uncontrolled by rising water prices, it will meet the environmental needs as a consumer. Prioritize water of higher economic value and its direct and indirect benefits. In the next 30 years, water demand in developing countries will increase as well as in developed countries. According to the International Panel on Climate Change, climate change will increase the pressure for water availability and exacerbate various forms of water pollution, affecting ecosystems, human health and the reliability of water systems in large parts of the world.
Discussion and Conclusion: In the present study, based on economic principles and environmental economics and using the available information on water consumption in agriculture, industry and environment and macroeconomic accounts to assess the economic value (value Production of water in the catchment area of Lake Urmia). Therefore, according to the results, it is expected that with the establishment of the water market or at least in terms of economic value of ecosystem services, water allocated to the environmental needs of Lake Urmia will be supplied and specific water for industrial use will increase and at the same time capital Payments to use the revenue-generating potentials of Lake Urmia and related and appropriate industries should be given special attention. Utilization of water resources by these calculations is neither economical nor sustainable, a livelihood that is supposed to cause desertification and soil erosion or (globally) increase greenhouse gas emissions and cannot be considered stable. In this regard, due to the unsustainable use of water resources in the catchment area of Lake Urmia, to change the existing method and reduce farmers' dependence on water resources, the governance system can implement appropriate employment strategies, while supporting the response to Alternative needs and livelihoods for farmers by strengthening the implementation of the protection policy of Lake Urmia, especially by enforcing the law on harvesting water resources and establishing a system for measuring, regulating and controlling authorized withdrawals and establishing cooperatives of farmers. The exploitation of the lake in exchange for changing the existing agricultural pattern to a pattern with less water requirement or even modifying agricultural tributaries and allocating it to Lake Urmia to such farmers are granted. It is very important that it is necessary to consider people-centeredness and naturalism at the same time, and all decisions and executive actions to reduce water consumption, with the participation of existing recipients and with the cohesion, cooperation and joint action of all trustees and stakeholders.
4- System of Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounts
References:
کشاورز، ع. شریعتمدار، م. خسروی، ع. شیخی مهرآبادی،ا. برآورد ارزش اقتصادی آب از دست رفتهی ناشی از ضایعات محصولات کشاورزی (زراعی و باغی آبی) از مرحله برداشت تا قبل از مصرف،آب و توسعه پایدار، 1395،(1)
وزارت نیرو، نظامنامه تخصیص آب، 1388، صفحه
Reya, D. Dionisio, C. and others 2019 Role of economic instruments in water allocation reform: lessons from Europe, InternatIonal Journal of Water resources Development 2019, Vol. 35, No. 2, 206–23
راهنمای تعیین ارزش اقتصادی آب برای مصارف کشاورزی در نشریه شماره 666 معاونت برنامهریزی و نظارت راهبردی رییس جمهور(کار مشترک معاونت نظارت راهبردی- امور نظام فنی و وزارت نیرو - دفتر مهندسی و معیارهای فنی آب و آبفار)،1390.
امیرنژاد، ح. تعیین ارزش کل اقتصادی اکوسیستم جنگلهای شمال ایران با تاکید بر ارزشگذاری زیستمحیطی – اکولوژیکی و ارزشهای حفاظتی، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1384، 166 صفحه.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, , Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Suttonkk, P. and Belt, M. (1997). The Value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387115: 253-260.
PEMBINA Institute 2002.Counting Canada.s Natural Capital: Assessing the Real Value of Canadas Boreal Ecosystem.Canadian Boreal Initiative.
زارع مایوان، ح. معماریانی، ف. ارزش گذاری کارکردها وخدمات اکوسیستمی مناطق آسیب دیده پارک ملی گلستان دراثر آتش سوزیهای سال 1374، مجله پژوهش و سازندگی، شماره 43، تابستان 1378 .
Young, R A. 2005. Determining the economic value of water: Concepts and methods. Resources for the future RFF press, Washington DC.
10-Young, R. A. and J. B. Loomis, 2014. Determining the economic value of water, concepts and methods. RFF press, Washington D.C.
وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی مؤسسه تحقیقات و علوم شیلاتی کشور- مرکز تحقیقات ارتمیای کشور، برآورد ذخائر ارتمیای دریاچه ارومیه. 1395.
طرح حفاظت تالابهای ایران، تشریح شرایط پایه دریاچه ارومیه، 1391.
ENVIRONMENT–TEAM FAO STATISTICS DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING TRAINING, APRIL 15 – 17, 2016 – ENTEBBE, UGANDA System of Environmental - Economic - Accounting
انتظاری، فرید. ارزیابی ردپای آب استاندارد جهانی، هوکسترا، آرین. چاپاگین، آشوک. مکونن، مسفین. 8-025-474-600-978 مشهد، مینوفر، 1396، صفحه 231.
بانک مرکزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، سری زمانی حسابهای ملی، 1397. گزارش 668، 194 صفحه.
مرکز آمار ایران، سالنامه آماری کشور، صفحه 353.
بانک مرکزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شاخص بهای تولیدکننده، 1397. گزارش 213، 165 صفحه.
مرکز آمار ایران، نتایج طرح آمارگیری از کارگاههای صنعتی 10 نفر کارکن و بیشترکشور، سال 1393. 120 صفحه.
Mastrorilli, M. Rana, G. Verdiani, G. Tedeschi, G. Fumai, A. and Russo, G. 2018 Economic Evaluation of Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean River Basins Applied to a Case Study in Southern Italy. Journal Water-10-00241
Hassanzadeh, E. 2019 Trade-O_s between Human and Environment: Challenges for Regional Water Management under Changing Conditions. Journal Water-11-01773
Jialin, L., Dianfa, Z., Xiaoping, Y. and Yiqing, T. (2009). Effects of land use changes on values of ecosystem functions on coastal plain of south Hangzhou Bay Bank, China. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 4 (5): 542-547.
Martin, J. Ferrier, RC. Gordon, IJ. Khan, S. 2015 Water Ecosystem Services a Global Perspective. University University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom
_||_
کشاورز، ع. شریعتمدار، م. خسروی، ع. شیخی مهرآبادی،ا. برآورد ارزش اقتصادی آب از دست رفتهی ناشی از ضایعات محصولات کشاورزی (زراعی و باغی آبی) از مرحله برداشت تا قبل از مصرف،آب و توسعه پایدار، 1395،(1)
وزارت نیرو، نظامنامه تخصیص آب، 1388، صفحه
Reya, D. Dionisio, C. and others 2019 Role of economic instruments in water allocation reform: lessons from Europe, InternatIonal Journal of Water resources Development 2019, Vol. 35, No. 2, 206–23
راهنمای تعیین ارزش اقتصادی آب برای مصارف کشاورزی در نشریه شماره 666 معاونت برنامهریزی و نظارت راهبردی رییس جمهور(کار مشترک معاونت نظارت راهبردی- امور نظام فنی و وزارت نیرو - دفتر مهندسی و معیارهای فنی آب و آبفار)،1390.
امیرنژاد، ح. تعیین ارزش کل اقتصادی اکوسیستم جنگلهای شمال ایران با تاکید بر ارزشگذاری زیستمحیطی – اکولوژیکی و ارزشهای حفاظتی، رساله دکتری، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، 1384، 166 صفحه.
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, , Farberk, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Suttonkk, P. and Belt, M. (1997). The Value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387115: 253-260.
PEMBINA Institute 2002.Counting Canada.s Natural Capital: Assessing the Real Value of Canadas Boreal Ecosystem.Canadian Boreal Initiative.
زارع مایوان، ح. معماریانی، ف. ارزش گذاری کارکردها وخدمات اکوسیستمی مناطق آسیب دیده پارک ملی گلستان دراثر آتش سوزیهای سال 1374، مجله پژوهش و سازندگی، شماره 43، تابستان 1378 .
Young, R A. 2005. Determining the economic value of water: Concepts and methods. Resources for the future RFF press, Washington DC.
10-Young, R. A. and J. B. Loomis, 2014. Determining the economic value of water, concepts and methods. RFF press, Washington D.C.
وزارت جهاد کشاورزی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی مؤسسه تحقیقات و علوم شیلاتی کشور- مرکز تحقیقات ارتمیای کشور، برآورد ذخائر ارتمیای دریاچه ارومیه. 1395.
طرح حفاظت تالابهای ایران، تشریح شرایط پایه دریاچه ارومیه، 1391.
ENVIRONMENT–TEAM FAO STATISTICS DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL AND ECONOMIC ACCOUNTING TRAINING, APRIL 15 – 17, 2016 – ENTEBBE, UGANDA System of Environmental - Economic - Accounting
انتظاری، فرید. ارزیابی ردپای آب استاندارد جهانی، هوکسترا، آرین. چاپاگین، آشوک. مکونن، مسفین. 8-025-474-600-978 مشهد، مینوفر، 1396، صفحه 231.
بانک مرکزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، سری زمانی حسابهای ملی، 1397. گزارش 668، 194 صفحه.
مرکز آمار ایران، سالنامه آماری کشور، صفحه 353.
بانک مرکزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، شاخص بهای تولیدکننده، 1397. گزارش 213، 165 صفحه.
مرکز آمار ایران، نتایج طرح آمارگیری از کارگاههای صنعتی 10 نفر کارکن و بیشترکشور، سال 1393. 120 صفحه.
Mastrorilli, M. Rana, G. Verdiani, G. Tedeschi, G. Fumai, A. and Russo, G. 2018 Economic Evaluation of Hydrological Ecosystem Services in Mediterranean River Basins Applied to a Case Study in Southern Italy. Journal Water-10-00241
Hassanzadeh, E. 2019 Trade-O_s between Human and Environment: Challenges for Regional Water Management under Changing Conditions. Journal Water-11-01773
Jialin, L., Dianfa, Z., Xiaoping, Y. and Yiqing, T. (2009). Effects of land use changes on values of ecosystem functions on coastal plain of south Hangzhou Bay Bank, China. African Journal of Agricultural Research. Vol. 4 (5): 542-547.
Martin, J. Ferrier, RC. Gordon, IJ. Khan, S. 2015 Water Ecosystem Services a Global Perspective. University University Printing House, Cambridge CB2 8BS, United Kingdom