Applying Network Analysis to the Planning of Urban Green Spaces (Case Study of Ahvas Metropolis)

Subject Areas : environmental management

Sorour Shafinejad ¹ , Fatemeh Poodat ² , Forouzan Farrokhian ³

1 - Graduated in master's degree in Environmental Management, Department of Environmental Management, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Iran.
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Environment, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran *(Corresponding Author)

Received: 2018-04-25 Accepted : 2019-01-27 Published : 2023-12-22

Keywords: urban landscape, Ahvaz, conservation prioritization, Green spaces network, ecological conservation,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: Uncontrolled urban expansion leads to fragmentation and isolation of native vegetation that are surrounded by built environment. Nevertheless, urban green patches with suitable condition are still able to serve as a connected network to support biological diversity and enhance the ecological functioning of landscape. This research aims to study the value of green spaces, in maintenance of connectivity of the urban green network of Ahvaz and applying the results in urben green patches planning. Material and Methodology: The method is through modelling and studying the case study of ahvaz metropolis. Also the landscape ecological approach and a network analysis is used. To determine a network, all green patches in Ahvaz landscape, both in the public and private were incorporated due to their habitat values in nesting native animal species. Landscape network is modelled based on Graph Theory and using IIC metric and the network connectivity and the importance of nodes were assessed. Also, patches are prioritized based on their importance. Findings: Resaults revealed the largest patches are of higher priority that are the farms in 4th and 5th district and a large urban park in 3rd district. Indeed, the most valuable patches are located in a linear pattern along the river path. Discussion and Conclusion: Accurate identification of ecological valuable patches assist the targeted increases in per capita green space and suitable distribution of green spaces within the city of Ahvaz, in particular, those districts that suffer from the low per capita of green patches, which leads to effective enhancement and conservation of most important green spaces.

References:

1. Bennett, A. Linkages in the landscape: the role of corridors and connectivity in wildlife conservation: IUCN, Gland. UK; Switzerland and Cambridge, 2003.


2. Crooks K. R & Sanjayan M. Connectivity Conservation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.


3. Poodat, F. Arrowsmith C. Fraser D. & Gordon A. Prioritizing urban habitats for connectiving conservation: Integrating centrality and ecological metrics. Environmenta Management; 2015. 56(3):664-674.


4. Poodat, F., barghjelveh, S. D., mirkareme, H. C. An analytical review on how to measure ecological continuity in order to protect biodiversity in cities. Environmental Researches, 2015; 5(10): 195-210. (In Persian)


5. Taylor P. D. Fahrig  Helein  K. & Merriam G. Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos; 1993. 68(3): 571-573.


6. Podat, F.,BarghJelveh, S.and Arrowsmith, K.An analysis of ecological continuity in order to protect wildlife in an urban landscape.The first international conference on landscape ecology: November 2012. Isfahan, Iran. (In Persian)


7. Ahmadi, A. Movahed, A.and Shojaeyan, A.Presenting the optimal location pattern of urban green spaces using GIS and AHP, the study area: Zone 7 of Ahvaz Municipality. Environmental studies magazine. 2011;4(15):147-162. (In Persian)


8. Mikaeeili, A., Sadeghi Benis, M. Urban Ecological Network of Tabriz City And Proposed Solutions for Preservation and Development. Environmental Researches, 2011; 1(2): 43-52. (In Persian)


9. Rayfield B, Fortin M.J, Fall A. Connectivity for conservation;a framework to classify network measures. Ecological society of America, 2011: 847-858.


10. Majnounian, H.Discussions about parks, green spaces and promenades, Tehran Municipality Publications. 1995. (In Persian)


11. Saura, S. & Torné, S., CONEFOR 2.6 User manual, 2012.


12. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S. Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation. Landscape Ecology ; 2006; 21(7): 959-967.


13. Pascual-Hortal L, Saura S. Impact of spatial scale on the identification of critical habitat patches for the maintenance of landscape connectivity. Landscape and Urban Planning; 2007; 83 (3): 176-186


14. Saura S. Rubio L. A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography ; 2010. 33: 523-537.


15. Saura Estreguil C. Mouton,C. & Rodríguez-Freire M. Network analysis to assess landscape connectivity trends: application to European forests (1990-2000). Ecological Indicators; 2011. 11: 407-416.


16. Alvandi, oral interview, Environmental Organization of Khuzestan Province; (In Persian)


17. Zetterberg A, Mortberg U.M, Balfors B. Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Landscape and urban planning; 2010. 95(6): 181-191.


18. Farrokhian, F., Mayedzadeh, H. The Effect of Urban Green Space on the Quality of Life of Citizens of Ahvaz City. 2020; 11(41): 23-36. (In Persian)


19. Dramstad, W., Olson, J. D. and Forman, R. T., Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land use planning. Translated by Foroud Azari Dehkordi.Adabestan publication;