The study of Errors made by Iranian EFL and AFL Students
Subject Areas : Persian Language and LiteratureMehdi Hosseinpanahi Tazeabad 1 , Omid varzandeh 2
1 - Instructor and Faculty Member, English language Department, Farhangian university, Sanandaj
2 - Assistant professor, English language Department IslamicAzad university Sanandaj branch, Iran
Keywords:
Abstract :
This study aims to investigate errors made by Iranian EFL (English as a Foreign Language) and AFL (Arabic as a Foreign Language) by comparing them separately and with each other. Previous studies, however, have paid less attention to the area of error analysis, especially in terms of comparing two common foreign languages, that is English and Arabic, in the context of Iran. 107 Iranian university students majoring in Arabic (56) and English (51) were selected from two universities in Sanandaj, Universities of Kurdistan and Farhangian. Their writing compositions for a final writing exam, were utilized for the purpose of this study. Using three separate tables, one for English, one for Arabic, another one for common ones, the errors were classified into three main areas for each language to be descriptively analyzed by the means of Ch-square formula. The results revealed significant differences among the errors made by EFL and AFL learners although, in some cases, such as comparing common ones, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to weak effect size value.
. رضایی، مهرداد 1376. تأثیر زبان اول بر نوشتار زبان دوم (پایاننامهی کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه شیراز.
2. سلیمانی، حبیب 1380. بررسی مقابلهای توانایی نوشتن در زبانهای خارجی و فارسی با تأکید بر نظم منطقی کلام و مهارت زبان (پایاننامهی کارشناسی ارشد)، دانشگاه تربیت معلم، تهران.
3. Al-Buainain, H. 2006. Students’ Writing Errors in EFL: A case study. Department of Foreign Languages.Qatar University.
4. Al-Buainain, H. A. and D. El-emadi, 1998. “The Relationship between Attitudes and Achievement in ESL at the University of Qatar”.Bulletin of the Documentation and Humanities, Vol. 10, University of Qatar (pp. 9- 42).
5. Corder, S.P. 1967. “The significance of learners’ errors”,reprinted in(1974, 1984):Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, London: Longman, pp. 19–27, originally in International Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5, No. 4.
6. Corpuz, V. A. F. S. 2011. Error Correction in Second Language Writing: Teachers’ beliefs, Practices, and Students’ Preferences. Queensland University of Technology, Faculty of Education.
7. Diab, N. 1997. The Transfer of Arabic in the English Writings of Lebanese Students.Lebanese American University, Beirut- Lebanon.The ESP, São Paulo.Vol.18, No. 1, pp.71-83.Retrieved on March27,2009 from: http:// www2.Lael .pucsp.br/specialist/181diab.ps.pdf
8. Fallahi, M. 1991. Contrastive Linguistics and analysis of errors. Tehran: University of Iran.
9. Ferris, D. R. 2011. Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. (2nd ed.) University of California: Davis.
10. Fisiak, J. 1981. Contrastive Analysis and the Language Teacher. Oxford: OUP.
11. Gass, S.M., &Selinker, L. 2008. Second Language Acquisition, an Introductory Course. (3rded.). University of Maryland.
12. Khansir, A. A. 2013. Error Analysis and Second Language Writing.Bushehr University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Iran.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 363-370.
13. Mungungu, S.S. 2010. Error Analysis: Investigating the Writing of ESL Namibian Learners. Thesis for MA degree.University of South Africa.
14. Wu, H. P. & Garza, E. V. 2014. Types and Attributes of English Writing Errors in the EFL Context—A Study of Error Analysis.Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 6, pp. 1256-1262.
_||_