Providing a Sustainability Reporting Framework based on Balancing Stakeholder Expectations and Company Capacity
Subject Areas :
Younes
Ahmadzade
1
(Department of Accounting, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran.)
Mahdi
Maranjory
2
(Department of Accounting, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran. Corresponding Author)
Razieh
Alikhani
3
(Department of Accounting, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran)
Yousef
Taghipouryan
4
(Department of Accounting, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran)
Keywords: Balance, Stakeholder Expectations, Company Capacities, Keywords: Corporate Sustainability Disclosure,
Abstract :
Abstract Many stakeholders, Current reporting In relation to corporate sustainability they consider it insufficient for their needs. Therefore, this is important to create a gap between Stakeholder expectations and corporate performance in reporting is sustained. Therefore, this study seeks to provide a providing a sustainability reporting Framework based on balancing stakeholder expectations and company capacity. In this study, 138 companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange have been studied, the method of this research is survey and its sampling is purposeful. To study the model, Cronbach's alpha, hybrid, shared and convergent reliability methods were used, and to fit the model, factor loads, path significance, and finally paired t-test were used. SPSS and Smart PLS software were also used for data analysis.Findings show that out of 169 components studied (classified in 11 groups), 85 components (for sustainability disclosure) have been expected by stakeholders and in all groups except the index class of the organization, between the current situation and the case There was a significant difference in stakeholder expectations, Finally, after creating a balance between the components, a model consisting of 60 components was presented in the form of a balanced company stability report.
فهرست منابع
_||_
یادداشت ها
1- Ho and Et al
2- Freeman
3- Kleine and Et al