The Introducing of Effective Factors in Absorption of Liabilities
Subject Areas :Saeed Jabbarzadeh Kangarluei 1 , Anvar Bayazidi 2 , Amjad Rahmanzadeh 3
1 - استادیار دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد ارومیه
2 - کارشناس ارشد حسابداری دانشگاه شیراز
3 - کارشناس ارشد حسابداری دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد تبریز
Keywords: Liability Absorption, Percentage of Institutional Ownership, Pooled Regression, and Exchange Companies,
Abstract :
The aim of this research is to introduce of effective factors in financing by liabilities in listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange. Time period of the research is 2003-2008 and it’s been ed 360 firm-years as sample. To analyze of research data in pooled status were used multiple regression models with fixed effect in econometric software EViews 6. In this research, Debt structure (financial leverage of total liabilities to total assets) was applied as dependent variables and percentage of institutional ownership as independent variable, and it’s used effective control variables on liabilities structure such as dividend pay out ratio, profitability, business risk, assets structure, liquidity, growth rate (market-to-book ratio) and company size, too. Findings show that there isn’t relation between liability absorption and percentage of institutional ownership; however, with entering control variables to regression model, explanatory power of it increases 27% to 46%. The results too indicate that profitability, business risk, assets structure, liquidity, growth rate and size of firm have been effective factors on liability absorption during research period. It should be mentioned that among research variables, business risk variable has had the highest effect on liability absorption based on its high regression coefficient in comparing to other variables.
حشمتی، مرتضی، 1385، بررسی تأثیر اطلاعات گذشته بر ساختار سرمایه شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه شیراز.
راه‌چمنی، ابوالقاسم، 1385، مدیریت شرکت‌های بیمه در دوره پس از خصوصی‌سازی: نقش ساختار مالکیت و میزان حمایت از حقوق سرمایه‌گذاران، فصلنامه آسیا، تابستان 85، صص. 36-30.
رشاد، عبدالخلیق، 1379، پژوهش‌های تجربی در حسابداری: دیدگاه روش‌شناختی ، محمد نمازی، چاپ اول، شیراز، انتشارات دانشگاه شیراز.
سینایی، حسنعلی، 1386، بررسی تأثیر عوامل داخلی شرکت‌ها بر چگونگی شکل‌گیری ساختار سرمایه شرکت‌های عضو بورس اوراق بهادار تهران، بررسی‌های حسابداری و حسابرسی، شماره 48، صص. 84-63.
صلواتی، شاپور و امیر رساییان، 1386، بررسی رابطه ساختار سرمایه و نقدشوندگی سهام در ایران، نامه مفید(نامه اقتصادی)، شماره 13(پیاپی 63)، صص. 163-143.
کیمیاگری، علی محمد و سودابه عینعلی، 1387، ارائه الگوی جامع ساختار سرمایه (مطالعه موردی شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس تهران) ، تحقیقات مالی، شماره 25، صص. 108-91.
Al-najjar, B. & P.Taylor, (2008), "The Relationship between Capital Structure and Ownership Structure", Managerial Finance, Vol. 34, PP. 919-33.
Bathala, C. and K.Moon and R.Rao, (1994), "Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impact of Institutional Hholdings: An Agency Perspective", Financial Management, Vol. 23, PP. 38-50.
Berger, P. and E.Ofek and D.Yermack, (1997), "Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions", Journal of Finance, Vol. 52, PP. 1411-38.
Bhaduri, S., (2002), "Determinants of Corporate Borrowing: Some Evidence the Indian Corporate Structure", Journal of Economic and Finance, Vol. 26, PP. 200-15.
Brailsford, T. J. and B. R. Oliver and S. L. H.Pua, (2002), "On the Relation between Ownership Structure and Capital Structure", Accounting and Finance, Vol. 42, PP. 1-26.
Chaganti, R. & F.Damanpour, (1991), "Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure and Firm Performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, PP. 479-93.
Chen, C. & T.Steiner, (1999), "Managerial Ownership and Agency Conflicts: An on Linear Simultaneous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, Risktaking, Debt Policy, and Dividend policy", Financial Review, Vol. 34, PP. 119-36.
Crutchley, C. E. & M. R. H.Jensen, (1996), "Changes in Corporate Debt Policy: Information Asymmetry and Agency Factors", Managerial Finance, Vol. 22, PP. 1-16.
Grier, P. and E.Zychowicz, (1994), "Institutional Investors, Corporate Discipline and the Role of Debt", Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 46, PP. 1-11.
Huang, H. and Q.Wang and X.Zhang, (2009), "The Effect of CEO Ownership and Shareholder Rights on Cost of Equity Capital", Corporate Governance, Vol. 9, No. 3, PP. 255-270.
Jensen, G. R. and D. P.Zolberg and T.Zorn, (1992), "Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies", Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 27, PP. 247-63.
Jensen, M., (1986), "Agency Cost Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers", American Economic Review, Vol. 76, PP. 323-9.
Jensen, M. & W.Meckling, (1976), "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure", Journal of Finance Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, PP. 305-60.
John, K. & J.Williams, (1985), "Dividends, dilution, and Taxes: a Signaling Equilibrium", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, PP. 1053-70.
Leland, H. E. & D. H.Pyle, (1977), "Informational asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 32, PP. 371-8.
Miller, M. H. & Kevin, R. ,(1985),"Dividend Policy under Asymmetric Information", The Journal of Finance, Vol. 40, PP. 1031-51.
Moh’d, M. A. and L. G.Perry and J. N.Rimbey, (1998), "The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time Series Cross-Sectional Analysis", The Financial Review, Vol. 33, PP. 85-98.
Myers, S. C. & N. S.Majluf, (1984), "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms have Information that Investors Do not have", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, PP. 187-221.
Tong, S. & Y.Ning, (2004), "Does Capital Structure Affect Institutional Investor Choices?", The Journal of Investing, Vol. 28, PP. 53-66.
Tsai, H. & Z.Gu, (2007), "The Relationship Between Institutional Ownership and Casino Firm Performance", Hospitality Management, Vol. 26, PP. 517-530.
Waling, R. & M.Long, (1984), "Agency Theory, Management Welfare, and Takeover Bid Resistance", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 1, PP. 54-68.