Modeling of Audit Production Efficiency based on the Business Risk Audit Approach
Subject Areas :
Shoeyb Rostami OstadKelayeh
1
(Department of Accounting, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran)
MohammadAli Aghaei
2
(Department of Accounting, TarbiatModares University, Tehran, Iran. Corresponding Author)
Kumars Biglar
3
(Department of Accounting, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran)
Keywords: Grounded Theory, Keywords: Business Risk Audit, Audit Production Efficiency, Auditee Business Risk, Risk of Material Misstatement,
Abstract :
AbstractBased on the business risk audit (BRA) approach, auditors should define and perceive strategic management control techniques and operating processes to evaluate a business. They should also select risk control processes in vital operating processes to estimate the type and magnitude of residual business risks that might affect the accuracy and fairness of financial statements. In the present study, using a qualitative approach with the help of Grounded theory and in-depth interviews with 31 auditing experts in 2021 with the titles of partner, members of the audit organization and members of IACPA specialized working groups, to understand their mental meanings and BRA approach to conduct the audit was interviewed. In addition, textual data from notes and articles in international professional journals on BRA were used, which mainly provided the views of various experts. The research data were analyzed using open coding method in Grounded theory and major categories, categories, and subcategories (concepts) were extracted. Using a systemic approach that includes inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and contextual factors, the model of audit production efficiency was designed based on the business risk audit and the categories that emerged were presented. Considering the limited scope of previous research on BRA and especially the lack of comprehensive research in Iran, the designed model, which is multifaceted and the result of the views of various auditing experts, provides a broad and comprehensive view of audit production efficiency based on the business risk audit that can be used in audit quality improvement programs, evaluating independent audit and other macro strategies for the development of audit methodology in Iran.Given the flaws and shortcomings of Iran’s current auditing framework, integrating the BRA approach into the current framework will be promising. At the same time, this approach can prevent over-auditing due to its proved inherent value. It can also be considered a naturally correct method of auditing.
فهرست منابع
ابوالمعالی، خدیجه، (١٣٩١)،"پژوهش کیفی از نظریه تا عمل"، نشرعلم، تهران، چاپ اول.
آذینفر، کاوه، عباس قدرتی زوارم و محمد نوروزی، (1398)، "تأثیر ابعاد ریسک بر قیمتگذاری حسابرسی. نشریه پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی"، سال 11، شماره 44، صص 174-155.
اشتراوس، آنسلم و جولیت کوربین، (١٩٩٨)، "اصول روش پژوهش کیفی، نظریه مبنایی- رویه‌ها و شیوهها"، ترجمه بیوک محمدی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی، تهران، ١٣٩٣، چاپ سوم.
الفتی، سمیرا و فریدون اوحدی، (1401)، "طراحی مدل پیشبینی ریسک تجاری با استفاده از تکنیکهای یادگیری ماشین"، نشریه دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، سال 11، شماره 42، صص 134-121.
ایمان، محمدتقی، (١٣٩١)،"روششناسی پژوهشهای کیفی"، قم، پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشکاه، چاپ اول.
بازرگان، عباس، (١٣٩١)، "مقدمه‌ای بر روشهای پژوهش کیفی و آمیخته - رویکردهای متداول در علوم رفتاری"، نشر دیدار، تهران.
حاجیها، زهره، (1391)،"ترجیحات حسابرسان ایران از ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر ریسک ذاتی در سطح مانده حسابها و صورتهای مالی"، نشریه پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، سال 4، شماره 16، صص 43-19.
حمصیان کاشانی، زهرا، زهره حاجیها، حسین جهانگیرنیا و رضا غلامی جمکرانی، (1400)، "تدوین مدل کیفیت مستندسازی حسابرسی با رویکرد مبتنی بر نظریه‌پردازی زمینه بنیان"، نشریه پژوهشهای حسابداری مالی و حسابرسی، سال 13، شماره 52، صص 184-151.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن، سیدمهدی الوانی و عادل آذر، (١٣٩٢)، "روششناسی پژوهش کیفی در مدیریت: رویکردی جامع"، انتشارات صفار، تهران، چاپ دوم.
Al-Qudah, L.A. (2021), “The Impact of Business Risk-Based Audit Approach on Reducing Unsystematic Risks: Evidence from Jordanian Banks”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), PP. 343–352.
Bonner, S. E. (2008), “Judgment and Decision Making in Accounting”, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Chang, H., Kao, Y-C., Mashruwala, R., & Sorensen, S.M. (2018), “Technical Inefficiency, Allocative Inefficiency, and Audit Pricing”, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 33(4), PP. 580–600.
Curtis E., Humphrey, C., & Turley, W. S. (2016), “Standards of Innovation in Auditing”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 35(3), PP. 75–98.
Deloitte. (2017), “Aspire with Assurance: Illuminating the Audit of the Future”, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, UK, available at: http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/au/Documents/audit/ deloitte-au-audit-brochure-060417.pdf, accessed 30 December 2018.
De Martinis, M., & Houghton, K. (2019), “The Business Risk Audit Approach and Audit Production Efficiency”, ABACUS: A Journal of Accounting, Finance and Business Studies, 55(4), PP. 734-782.
ECIIA, European Confederation Institutes of Internal Audit (2020), “Risk in Focus 2020: Hot Topics for Internal Auditors”.
Ernst and Young. (2017), “Top 10 Business Risks Facing Mining and Metals 2017–2018”, EYGM Limited, UK, available at: https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-top-10-business-risks-facingmining-and-metals-2017-2018/$FILE/ey-top-10-business-risks facing-mining-and-metals-2017-2018.pdf, 30 December 2018.
DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. (2014), “A Review of Archival Auditing Research”, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 58(2/3), PP. 275–326.
Francis, J. R. (2011), “A Framework for understanding and Researching Audit Quality”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2), PP. 125–152.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. (2002), “Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields”, Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), PP. 58–80.
IAASB. (2014), “A Framework for Audit Quality: Key Elements that Create anEnvironment for Audit Quality”, Handbooks, Standards, and Pronouncements.
IAASB. (2019), “International Auditing Standards (ISA 315), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatements through Understanding the Entity and its Environment”, available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/isa-315-revised-2019-identifying-and-assessing-risks-material-misstatement.
Ilgen, D. R. (1999), “Teams Embedded in Organizations: Some Implications”, The American Psychologist, 54(2), PP. 129–139.
Knechel, W. R. (2007), “The Business Risk Audit: Origins, Obstacles and Opportunities”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(4–5), PP. 383–408.
Knechel, W. R., G. V. Krishnan, M. Pevzner, L. B. Shefchik, & U. K. Velury. (2013), “Audit Quality: Insights from the Academic Literature”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (Supplement), PP. 385–421.
KPMG. (2016), “KPMG’s Dynamic Risk Assessment, KPMG International”, available at: https://assets.kpmg. com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2016/10/ dynamic-risk-assessment-brochure.pdf, accessed30 December 2018.
LE, T. T., & Nguyen, T. M. A. (2020), “The Adoption of Risk Based Audit Approach in the Independent Audit Firms: A Study of Case of Vietnam”, Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(2), PP. 89-97.
Malsch, B., & Gendron, Y. (2013), “Re-theorizing Change: Institutional Experimentation and the Struggle for Domination in the Field of Public Accounting”, Journal of Management Studies 50(5), PP. 870–899.
Patton, M. Q. (2015), “Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods”,4th edition. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
PwC Australi. (2018), “Business Risk: Take the Driver’s Seat in a Changing World of Risk”, available at: https://www.pwc.com.au/assurance/business-risk.html, accessed 30 December 2018.
Trotman, A. J. (2013), “Internal Audit Quality: A Multi-Stakeholder Analysis, Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy”, School of Business Bond University, Australia.
Trotman, A. J. & Duncan, K. (2018), “Internal Audit Quality: Insights from Audit Committee Members, Senior Management and Internal Auditors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory.
Van Buuren, J., Koch, C., Van Nieuw Amerongen, N., & Wright, A. (2014), “The Use of Business Risk Audit Perspectives by Non-Big 4 Audit Firms”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 33(3), PP. 105–128.
Van Buuren, J., Koch, C., Van Nieuw Amerongen, N., & Wright, A. (2018), “Evaluating the Change Process for Business Risk Auditing: Legitimacy Experiences of non-Big 4 Auditors”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37(2), PP. 249–269.
West, M. A., &Anderson, N. R. (1996), “Innovation in Top Management Teams”, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), PP. 680–693.
Wright, W. F. (2016), “Client Business Models, Process Business Risks and the Risk of Material Misstatement of Revenue”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 48, PP. 43-55.