Bootstrap-DEA efficiency: Radial and non-radial approaches in the banking industry
Subject Areas : Financial Economicsmohamadreza pahle 1 , mahdi fathabadi 2 , parvane salatin 3
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, Firuzkuh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran; mohamadreza.pahle@gmail.com
2 - Assistant professor at Firuzkuh Branch, Islamc Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran (Crossponding Authur), Mehdi_fa88@yahoo.com
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Firuzkuh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran; par_salatin@yahoo.com
Keywords: Efficiency, Bootstrap, Data Envelopment Analysis, Bank.,
Abstract :
This article aims to assess the efficiency of 15 stock market banks over the period 2014-2022. Utilizing non-parametric radial efficiency (Debreu-Farrell efficiency) and non-radial efficiency (Russell efficiency) methods, we analyze constant, non-increasing, and variable return-to-scale technologies. Recognizing limitations within radial methods, bias-corrected technical efficiency is also estimated using bootstrap data envelopment analysis. Radial analysis reveals inefficiency among all banks except for the Middle East bank. The average Debreu-Farrell efficiency stands at 77% under constant return to scale and 82% under variable return to scale, while the average Russell efficiency is 58% and 67% respectively. These results suggest slack in Debreu-Farrell efficiency. Bootstrap efficiency findings reveal underestimation in both radial and non-radial efficiency, thereby overstating actual efficiency levels. Bias-corrected radial technical efficiency scores from the bootstrap approach indicate inefficiency across all banks, with Dey and Sarmaye banks exhibiting particularly poor performance. Thus, adopting appropriate strategies such as non-performing loan management, increased non-interest incomes, and reduced operational costs is imperative to enhance efficiency.
امیری، حسین. (1397). ارزیابی کارایی بانکهای منتخب در ایران و ارتباط آن با متغیرهای درون بانکی و کلان اقتصادی. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 7(26)، 89-114.
- امیری، حسین (1397). ارزیابی کارایی بانکهای منتخب در ایران و ارتباط آن با متغیرهای درون بانکی و کلان اقتصادی. فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصادی کاربردی ایران، 7(26)، 114-89.DOI: 10.22084/AES.2018.14331.2510 - ترخانی، عطیه، نظری، عظیم، و نیلوفر، پریسا (1399). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر کارایی صنعت بانکداری ایران (روش دو مرحلهای سیمار و ویلسون). اقتصاد مقداری (بررسیهای اقتصادی)، 17(2)، 41-1. DOI:10.22055/JQE.2019.14838 - تقویفرد، محمدتقی، حبیبی, رضا، و مهدزاده، حجت (1400). سنجش عملکرد بانکها با استفاده از مدل DEA دو مرحلهای(مطالعه موردی شعبه بانک سپه استان تهران). بررسیهای بازرگانی، 19(109)، 114-99. DOI:10.22034/BS.2021.247044 - درویشمتولی، محمدحسین، حسینزاده لطفی، فرهاد، شجاع، نقی، و غلامابری، امیر (1398). محاسبه کارایی زنجیره تامین پایدار در صنعت سیمان (کاربرد مدل تحلیل پوششی دادههای شبکهای). مدلسازی اقتصادی، 13(46)، 100-73. - عرفانیاندانشور، مسعود، شعبانیکلیشمی، احمد، و کوهی، حسن (1398). مقایسه کارایی بانکهای اسلامی و متعارف با استفاده از مدل مرز تصادفی (مطالعه موردی: بانکهای منتخب منطقه منا. فصلنامه مطالعاتی در مدیریت بانکی و بانکداری اسلامی، 5، 167-129. DOI:10.22034/JIFB.2021.244248.1209 - غلامابری، امیر(1392). ارزیابی کارایی شعب سازمان تامین اجتماعی استان اصفهان. مدلسازی اقتصادی، 8(25)، 99-83. - نامداری، روحانگیز، اقبالی، علیرضا، و یوسفی، رضا (1389). ارزیابی کارایی در بانک های دولتی ایران با استفاده از روش DEA. دانش مالی تحلیل اوراق بهادار (مطالعات مالی)، 3(7)، 112-97. - یاریفرد، سمیه، سالم، علیاصغر، محمدی، تیمور، و شاکریحسینآباد، عباس (1402). بررسی رابطهی بین دورهای ریسک، سرمایه و کارایی: ارزیابی از بانکهای ایران. اقتصاد باثبات، 4(2)، 33-1. DOI:10.22111/SEDJ.2023.44668.1301 - Amiri, H. (2018). Evaluation the effectiveness of selected banks in Iran and its relationship with banking internal and macroeconomic variables. Journal of Applied Economics Studies in Iran, 7(26), 89-114. (in persian) doi: 10.22084/aes.2018.14331.2510 - Badunenko, O., Henderson, D. J., & Kumbhakar, S. C. (2012). When, where and how to perform efficiency estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 175(4), 863-892. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23355306 - Belas, J., Cipovová, E., & Demjan, V. (2014). Current trends in area of satisfaction of bank clients in the Czech republic and Slovakia. Transformations in Business & Economics, 13(3), 142-155. - Corbae, D., & Levine, R. (2019). Competition, stability, and efficiency in the banking industry. Manuscript, University of Wisconsin. https://www. cemfi. es/ftp/pdf/paper s/wshop/CL052, 319. - Darvishmotevalli, M.H., Hosseinzadehlotfi, F., Shojae, N., & Gholamabri, A. (2009). Calculating the efficiency of the sustainable supply chain in the cement industry (using the network data envelopment analysis model). Economic Modeling, 13(46), 73-100. - Debreu, G. (1951). The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 273-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1906814. - Erfaniandaneshvar, M., Shaabani Kelishomi, A., & Kouhi, H. (2020). A Comparison of efficiency of islamic and conventional banks using SFA model (A case study: selected banks in the MENA region). Quarterly Studies in Banking Management and Islamic Banking, 5(Autumn & Winter), 129-167. (in persian) doi: 10.22034/jifb.2021.244248.1209 - Färe, R. (1988). Fundamentals of production theory (Vol. 22). Berlin: Springer-Verlag. - Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1985). A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 594-604. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439974. - Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. K. (1994). Production frontiers. Cambridge university press. - Färe, R., & Lovell, C. K. (1978). Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic theory, 19(1), 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(78)90060-1 - Färe, R., & Primont, D. (1994). Multi-output production and duality: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business Media. - Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 120(3), 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100 - Gholamabri, A. (2013). Evaluating the efficiency of social security organization branches in Isfahan province. Economic Modeling, 8(25), 83-99. - Hayat, S. (2011). Efficiency analysis of commercial banks in Pakistan–A non-parametric approach. Available at SSRN 1960063. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1960063 - Koopmans, T. C. (1951). An analysis of production as an efficient combination of activities. Activity analysis of production and allocation. - Kneip, A., Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2008). Asymptotics and consistent bootstraps for DEA estimators in nonparametric frontier models. Econometric Theory, 24(6), 1663-1697. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0266466608080651 - Li Z, Feng C, Tang Y. (2022). Bank efficiency and failure prediction: a nonparametric and dynamic model based on data envelopment analysis. Ann Oper Res. 315(1):279–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04597-4 - Lovell, C. K. (1993). Production frontiers and productive efficiency. The measurement of productive Efficiency: Techniques and applications, 3, 67. - Namdari, R., Eghbali, A., & Yousefi, R. (2010). Evaluation of efficiency in Iran's state banks using DEA method. Financial Knowledge of Securities Analysis (Financial Studies), 3(7), 97-112. - Othman, F. M., Mohd-Zamil, N. A., Rasid, S. Z. A., Vakilbashi, A., & Mokhber, M. (2016). Data envelopment analysis: A tool of measuring efficiency in banking sector. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 911-916. - Qayyum A., & Khan S. (2010). X-Efficiency, scale economies, technological progress, and competition: A case of banking sector in Pakistan. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan, working paper No. 23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41260648 - Rogova, E., & Blinova, A. (2018). The technical efficiency of Russian retail companies: an empirical analysis. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie, (5 (977)), 171-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.15678/ZNUEK.2018.0977.0511 - Sardar, A., Azeem, M. M., Hassan, S. & Bakhsh, K. (2013). Comparison of efficiency between pure Islamic banks and Islamic bank windows and the role of Islamic banking in the agriculture sector, Pak. J. Agri. Sci., 50(1): 155–161.p - Shaari J. A. N., Khalique M. & Isa, A. H. B. M. (2011). Ranking of public and domestic private sector commercial banks in Pakistan based on the intellectual capital performance. KASBIT Business Journal, 4: 61‐68. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2035216 - Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage. Sci., 44, 49–61. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2634426 - Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. J. Appl. Stat., 27, 779–802. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760050081951 - Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. (2002). Nonparametric tests of returns to scale. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 139, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00167-9 - Simar, L. & Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of productive efficiency. J. Economet., 136, 31–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.07.009 - Taghavifard, M. T., Habibi, R., & mahdizadeh, H. (2021). Performance measurement of bank branches using 2-stage DEA model (case study of bank Sepah in Tehran). Commercial Surveys, 19(109), 99-114. (in persian) doi: 10.22034/bs.2021.247044 - Tarkhani, A., Nazari, A., & Niloofar, P. (2020). Investigating effective factors on the Efficiency of Iranian banking industry (Simar and Wilson’s two-stage method). Quarterly Journal of Quantitative Economics, 17(2), 1-41. doi: 10.22055/jqe.2019.14838 - Wilson, P.W., (2003). Testing independence in models of productive efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 20, 361–390. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41770137 - Yarifard, S., Salem, A. A., Mohammadi, T., & Shakeri, A. (2023). The inter-temporal relationship between risk, capital and efficiency: Evidences from Iranian Banks. Stable Economy Journal, 4(2), 1-33. (in persian) doi: 10.22111/sedj.2023.44668.1301 - Zhu N., Wu Y., Wang B., & Yu Z. (2019). Risk preference and efficiency in Chinese banking. China Economic Review, 53, 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2018.11.001