An Assessment of Vulnerability and Resilience of Urban Land Use in Crisis and Emergency Evacuation
(A Case Study of Secondary Education District of Isfahan)
Subject Areas :
Masoud Taghvaei
1
,
Ali Jovzi Khameslouei
2
1 - Professor of Geography & Urban Planning, University of Isfahan
2 - Ph.D. Student of Geography & Urban Planning, University of Isfahan
Received: 2019-05-21
Accepted : 2019-06-23
Published : 2022-05-22
Keywords:
resilience,
Vulnerability,
Crisis,
Schools,
Secondary Education District of Isfahan,
Abstract :
Assessment of resilience rate in urban land uses and survey of their vulnerability situation in probable disasters is very prominent and has a special necessity in urban crisis management plans. Moreover, among urban land uses, educational land use has a singular significance because of the concentration of potential human resources in the future and the priority of rescue. The aim of this study is an assessment of the vulnerability rate in probable crises and also the availability of main management indicators in crisis planning and emergency evacuation of the population in the second education district of Isfahan. The case of this study is all schools in the secondary education district of Isfahan which is located in the third and fourth urban districts. The 142 participants of the study were selected from among the primary, secondary, high school, technical, and centers of special needs. The research method in this study is applied and descriptive. The schools in the study area have been evaluated and reviewed using two special indicator groups: basic and management indicators. The indicators are combined and new and are the latest ones in applied methods used by researchers and research institutes in the field of crisis management. The results show that schools in the secondary education district of Isfahan are weak in terms of fundamental structures and their resilience in probable crises such as earthquakes. On the other hand, the crisis management situation in these schools is undesirable based on their advantages. Therefore, these schools are extremely weak in crisis management and evacuation. In general, the situation of the schools studied in probable events is considered unsuitable, vulnerable, and critical, taking into account integrated indicators and requires strengthening of infrastructure and management approaches.
References:
اسماعیلی، م، شاهی، س. 1396. بررسی میزان آمادگی برای رویارویی با زمین لرزه در مدارس متوسطه دخترانه استان ایلام (دهلران و مورموری) سال تحصیلی ۹۵-۹۴. فصلنامه دانش پیشگیری و مدیریت بحران،3(7): 67-58.
امانپور، س، فیروزی، م، شاهکرمی، م. 1400. مکانهای ناپایدار شهری در برابر زلزله: مطالعه موردی: بافت فرسوده شهر خرمآباد، فصلنامه آمایش محیط. 14(54). 75- 98.
حجازیزاده، ز، مرادیخانی، ف، کنعانیمقدم، ه. 1396. بررسی آسیبپذیری مدارس بخش مرکزی شهریار در مقابل زلزله. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت شهری، 5(4): 105-91.
ذکریانی، ل، سپاسیمقدم، ح و نجفی، م. 1388. ارزشیابی دهمین مانور سراسری زلزله و ایمنی در مدارس کشور از دیدگاه دانش آموزان. فصلنامه امداد و نجات. 3(1). 38-30.
سرور، ه، کاشانیاصل، ا. 1395. ارزیابی آسیبپذیری کالبدی شهر اهر در برابر بحران زلزله. فصلنامه آمایش محیط. 3(34). 87- 108.
عبدالهی، ع، شرفی، ح، صباحی، ی. 1397. تابآوری نهادی و کالبدی- محیطی اجتماعات شهری در جهت کاهش بحران طبیعی زلزله؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر کرمان. فصلنامه آمایش محیط. 11(42). 165- 187.
عکاشه، ب و مرادی، ف. 1390. بررسی لرزهخیزی شهرستان شهریار و آسیبپذیری مدارس منطلقه از دیدگاه زلزله. فصلنامه زمین. 6(19). 162-143.
مهرآئین، ز و کاظمی، م. 1395. مطالعه آمادگی مدارس متوسطه اول شهر شیراز برای مواجهه با مخاطره زلزله. فصلنامه امداد و نجات. 8(2). 104-92.
2009. School-based Emergency Preparedness: a National Analysis and Recommended Protocol, First Publish. AHRQ Press.158 P.
Bytiyeh, H., Ocal, A, .2016. High school students’ perceptions of earthquake disaster: A comparative study of Lebanon and Turkey. Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 20(12). 115-132.
Cuesta, A .2016. Evacuation modeling trends. First publish. Springer press, 5-7.
Drayna, P., 2012. Disaster Management and Emergency Preparedness for Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs, Journal of Disaster management and emergency Preparedness. 6(13). 48-66.
2016. Earthquake Safety Activities for Children and Teachers. First Publish. FEMA Press.138P.
Fry, John., Jane, Binner,. Elementary modeling and behavioral analysis for emergency evacuation using social media, Journal of Operational Research. 25(249). 101–123.
Gelenbe, E., Fang, W,. 2012. Large Scale Simulation for Human Evacuation and Rescue. Journal of Computers and Mathematics with Applications. 12(64). 3869-3880.
Gustin, J.2015. Bioterrorism, 3th Edit. Fairmont Press. 104-124.
Haichao, Ran., Lihua, Sun., Xiaozhi., Gao. 2014. Influences of intelligent evacuation guidance system on crowd evacuation in building fire, Journal of Automation in Construction, 10(41). 78–92.
Hasegawa, A., Ohira, T,. 2016. Emergency Responses and Health Consequences after the Fukushima Accident; Evacuation and Relocation. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 7(28). 237-244.
Jiuh Wang, J,. 2016. Study on the context of school-based disaster management. Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 5(20). 229-241.
Liu, CH., Zhanli, M., Zhimin, F,. 2016. Emergency Evacuation Model and Algorithm in the Building with Several Exits. Journal of Procedia Engineering. 5(20), 223-241.
Murray-Tuite, P.2013. Changes in Evacuation Decisions between Hurricanes Ivan and Katrina, Journal of Transportation Research Board. 7(23). 98–107.
National Fire Protection Association. 2007. Emergency evacuation planning guide for people with disabilities. Second publish. NFPA Press. 125-131.
Preston, J.2015. City Evacuations: an interdisciplinary approach, Third edition. Springer press. 72-88.
Rebmann, T., Elliott, M., and Artman, D,. 2016. Impact of an Education Intervention on Missouri K-12 School Disaster and Biological Event Preparedness. Journal of School Health.18(86). 94-112.
Tveiten, K. 2012. Building resilience into emergency management, Journal of Safety Science. 25(50).19-38.
Yuan, , and Huang, Chang,. 2015. Modeling the emergency evacuation of the high rise building based on the control volume model. Journal of Safety Science. 25(73).1-19
_||_
