Analysis of sociological paradigms of underdevelopment of Iran from the perspective of Iranian theoreticians.

Subject Areas : ‌Family

Seyed Siavash Mousavi Rakati ¹ , mehrdad javaheripour ² , Hasan Mohadesi ³

1 - Ph.D. student of political sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor and Faculty Member of the Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor and Faculty Member of the Department of Sociology, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2018-08-16 Accepted : 2018-12-05 Published : 2018-11-22

Keywords: underdevelopment, structure, Colonialism, agent, Iranian theoreticians,

Abstract :

In this article is provided for analytical documentary attempts to answer this question, Why Iranian society lagged of development? In this direction, the books were written by Iranian theoreticians were analyzed, the outcome of which are the following: 1. theorists who consider the Iran''s underdevelopment paradigm is structure of society. These theorists argue that authoritarian structure and the growth of capitalism in this structure are reasons of underdevelopment of Iran. What is the genesis of the components of authorityin Iran were, the focus of economic and political, cultural structure immature and impaired learning communities, But what causes the development of capitalism in Iran, has been insecurity because of the fear of confiscation by the despotism brokers. 2- Theorists who consider the paradigm of Ounderdevelopment of the agency community. These theorists believe that the action of the Iranian society activists in Iran is causing of underdevelopment. The most important of these cultural elements must point to the ethos of Iranians, especially the illiterate public, seeking out Ghrbzgy and elite plumbing.3- theorists who consolidated the paradigm of underdevelopment Iran. These theorists believe that, in addition to the structure and functionality, they have to point to military attacks, external attacks and noted the role of colonialism.