Comparative investigation of the nature of causality of Mulla Sadra and hume

Subject Areas : فلسفه اسلامی

zinab  darvishi ¹ (student)
mohamadhosain  irandoost ² (hiatelmi)

Received: 2015-12-30 Accepted : 2016-03-12 Published : 2016-04-08

Keywords: causality, Experience, disabilities, empirical necessity,

Abstract :

The principle of causality , according to which any phenomenon requires a cause , One of the less known , the philosopher is not paid to the discussion. This paper describes the analytical methods , with the aim of evaluating and comparing the nature of causality Vnqady documents written hume Sadra. It seems , denial of causality Drmnzrhyvm the epistemological roots in the attitude to foreign and subjective realities , the empirical basis of the relationship was. The hume and asdra , causation is a philosophical principle and deep understanding not only of the philosophical wisdom comes from. Therefore , its appearance is deeper than experience , and the world is rational. Therefore , the interpretation of the observation and induction Aznzrsdra path goes further and becomes a philosophical principle where the effect is possible due to the kind of poverty. Mulla Sadra has ontological principle of causality to the theory of theophany. This theory can be considered mystical approach to causation.