Evaluation of soybean cultivats growth analysis effected from Rhizobium japonicum strains
Subject Areas : Agroecology JournalAmin Farnia 1 , Gorban Noormohammadi 2 , Ata-ollah Cyadat3 3
1 - Instructor of Borujerd Azad University, Ph.D.student of Science and Research, Islamic Azad University
2 - Prosessor, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University
3 - Assistant Professor of Agriculture College of Chamran University, Ahvaz
Keywords:
Abstract :
To investigate adaptation and effects of the different strains of Rhizobium japonicum on soybean cul ti var and selective of the best cultivar and bacteria strain, an experiment was carried out in Broujerd agriculture research station. A factorial design with 4 replications in the basis of randomized complete block was applied. Treatments included three cultivars of soybean (Clark, Williams and Zien) and two kinds of bacteria strain (Helinitro and Rizoking) and a level without bacteria strain (Control). To determine growth analysis, total dry matter (TOM), leaf dry matter (LOW) and leaf area index (LAI) were measured, and with three parameters other growth indexes were calculated. The results achieved showed that Williams cultivar and Helinitro bacteria strain ('' ith high level of nitrogen fixation) had better grain yield and nitrogen fixation efficiency than other cultivars and strains. These results obtained through increasing of the crop growth rate (CGR) and leaf area index (LAI), which these factors increased net assimilation rate (NAR) and total dry matter (TOM). The control plot leaf area index and crop growth rate were very low; consequently, net assimilation rate and total dry matter decreased and grain yield produced very low.
1. Bemer, E. and C. V. Kessl.1990. Selection of Rhizobium leguminosarum strains for lentil under growth room and field condition. Plant and soilSc.121, 47-56.
2. Fajeria, K. L. and V. C. baliyer .1991. Growth and mineral nutrition of field crops. 245-279.
3. Kaplan, S. L. and H. R. Kollen.1997. Leaf area and co2 -exchange rate as determination of rate of vegetative growth in soybean plants. Crop Sci., 17,35-38.
4. Koller, H. R., W. E. Nyiquist and I. S. Kourosh. 1995. Growth analysis of soybean community. Crop Sci.,10,215-218.
5. Leffel, R. C. and P. B. Cregan. 1992. Nitrogen metabolism of normal and high-seed-protein soybean. Crop Sci.,32, 05-808.
6. Serraj, R., L. H. Allen., J. R. Sinclair. 1999. Soybean leaf growth and gas exchange response to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. Global Change Bio. 5, 283-291.
7. Sneller, C.H. 2000. Improved soybean drought tolerance through improved nitrogen fixation and genetic transformation. Agron. univer. arkansas.
8. Vasilas, B.L. and R.L. Nelson. 1992. N2-fixation, dry matter and N accumulation in soybean lines with different seed fill periods. Can. j. plant Sci. 12,1067-1074.
9. Vandez, V. and R.T.Sinclair. 2000. Leaf ureide degradation and N2 fixation tolerance to water deficit in soybean. Agri. Res. Ser., .35. 201-206.
10. Zahran, H. H. 1999.Rhizobium-legume symbiosis and nitrogen fixation under severe conditions and in an arid climate. Micro. Mol. Biol., 63. 968-989.
_||_