Effects of plant distance and tuber size on yield and yield component of potato varieties
Subject Areas : Agroecology Journal
1 - Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch.
Keywords: yield, Potato, Planting distance, Yield component, Solanum tuberosom, Tuber size,
Abstract :
In order to study the effect ofplant distance and tuber size on yield and yield components of potato varieties, a factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design, at research station of Islamic Azad university, Tabriz branch during 2003-2004. Factors were variety in two levels, seed distance on planting rows in two levels and four levels of tuber size. Results of two year combined analysis showed that three way interaction of "year*variety*plant distance" for main stem numbers trait was significant, expressing different response of variety and plant distance upon mentioned trait in two years. Also interaction of year*variety, year*plant distance and year*tuber size for yield was significant, that represented different response of varieties for yield and different impressibility of yield by plant distance and tuber size during two years. Results revealed that Mourn was superior to Cosmos variety in most studied traits. Plant distance of 20 cm on implant rows increased yield and main stem numbers and 25 cm planting distance was impressible for production of less small and more moderate and large tubers. Tuber size of 35-55 mm was the best size in all studied traits. Overally, the results showed that treatment compound of Mourn variety, 20 cm seed distance and 35-55 mm tuber size was the best treatment. However, while the farmers have to cut tuber, the treatment compound of Mourn variety, 20 cm seed distance and oversize of 55 mm tuber was the most desirable treatment. According to different responses of potato varieties to plant distance and tuber size, incorporation of variety, plant density and tuber size.should be regarded to obtain high yield.
1- ارزانی، ا.1380. اصلاح گیاهان زراعی (ترجمه) (چاپ دوم)، انتشارات دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، 257 ص.
2- اصل گرگانی، ر. و دماوندی. ع. 1383. اثر رقم و تراکم بوته بر اجزای عملکرد و عملکرد غده سیبزمینی. مجله علمی پژوهشی دانش کشاورزی، جلد 14، شماره 3، ص. 50-40.
3- بینام. 1383. آمارنامه محصولات کشاورزی. اداره کل آمار و فنآوری اطلاعات، وزارت جهاد کشاورزی.
4- رضائی، ع. م. و سلطانی، ا. 1375. زراعت سیبزمینی (ترجمه). انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی مشهد، 132 ص.
5- زاهدی اول، م. 1375. اثر تراکم بوته و مقادیر مختلف کود پتاس بر کمیت و کیفیت دو رقم سیبزمینی. پایاننامه کارشناسی ارشد رشته زراعت دانشکده کشاورزی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، 96 ص.
6. Bussan, A. J., Mitchell, P. D., Copas, M. E., and Drilias, M. J. 2007. Evaluation of the effect of density on potato yield and tuber size distribution. Crop Science 47: 2462-2472.
7. Bohl, W. H., Love, S. L., and Patterson, P. E. 2003. Effect of four seed piece scrapings on economic return of Russet Burbank potatoes. Proceeding of Winter Commericial Schools 67-73, University of Idaho.
8. Bohl, W. H. 2006 . Consequences of poor potato planting. Idaho conference, January 18, 2006.
9. Chadha, K. L. 1994. Changing scenario of potato production in the world. in: G. S. Shekhawat (ed.), Potato: present and future. Indian Potato Assoc, Shimla, Pp. 5-11.
10. Grewal, J. S., Sharma, R. C., and Saini, S. S. 1992. Agrotechniques for intensive potato cultivation in India. ICAR, New Delhi, Pp. 126.
11. Ifenkwe, O. P., and Allen, E. G. 1978. Effect of row width and planting density on growth and yield of two main crop potato varieties, number of tubers, total and graded yields and their relationships with above ground stem densities. Journal of Agricultural Science 91: 279-289.
12. Manrique, A. 1993. Constraints for potato production in the tropics. Journal of Plant Nutrition 16: 2075-2080
13. Wiersema. S. G. 1987. Effect of stem density on potato production. Technical Information. Bulletin, CIP, Lima, Peru.
14. Wurr, D. C. E., and Allen, E. J. 1974. Some effects of planting density and variety relationship between tuber size and tuber dry- matter percentage in potato. Journal of Agricultural Science 82: 277-282.
15. Wurr, D. C. E., Fellows, J. R., and Allen, E. J. 1992. Determination of optimum tuber density in the potato varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science 119:35-59.
16. Wurr, D. C. E., Fellows, J. R., Suthrland, R. A., and Allen, E. J. 1990. Determination of optimum tuber planting density for production of tuber in processing ware grades in the potato variety Record. Journal of Agricultural Science 114: 11-18.
_||_