Effect of deficit irrigation regimes on yield, yield components and determination of the best drought resistance evaluation index of three bread wheat cultivars.
Subject Areas : Agroecology JournalHamid Dehghanzadeh 1 , mohammadreza Khajehpour 2 , hosein Heidari Sharif Abad 3 , ali Soleimani 4
1 - Scientific Board of Islamic Azad University, Naragh Branch.
2 - Associate Professor in Agronomy, Agriculture Faculty, Industrial University of Isfahan.
3 - Associate Professor of Seed and Plant Certification and Registeration Research Institute, Tehran.
4 - Assistant Professor in Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Khorasghan Branch.
Keywords: Water stress, yield, Wheat, Yield components, Irrigation Regimes,
Abstract :
In order to study the effect of irrigation regimes on yield and yield components of three bread wheat cultivars, Triticum aestivum L., an experiment was conducted at the research farm of Islamic Azad university, Khorasgan Branch in 2004-2006. The experiment was carried out as split plot based on randomized complete block design with four replications. Three irrigation regimes (based on 70 mm (I1), 90 mm (I2) and 110 mm (I3) pan evaporation) were arranged in main plots and three wheat cultivars including Ghods, Mahdavi and Roshan-backcross were planted in sub-plots. Results showed that I1 and I2 treatments was not significantly different in most yield and yield components measured traits. I3 treatment significantly reduced yield and yield components, but water use efficiency was not affected. Significant differences were observed in number of grain per spike, 1000 kernels weight and grain yield among cultivars. Ghods and Roshan-backcross had highest and lowest numbers of grain per spike, 1000 kernels weight and grain yield, respectively. Based on sensitivity and tolerance indices to water stress, Ghods showed better yield stability in response to increased water stress. The results indicated that irrigation of wheat after 90 mm cumulative pan evaporation could be save about 22% of irrigation water with no significant loss in yield, under conditions similar to this experiment.
1 - بینام. 1379. غلات در آیینه آمار. معاونت برنامهریزی و بودجه، اداره کل آمار و اطلاعات، وزارت کشاورزی، 298 صفحه.
2- توکلی، ع. 1382. اثرات کم آبیاری و کود نیتروژن بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد گندم. مجله علمی کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، جلد 26، شماره 2، ص. 87 – 75.
3- حسنپناه، د .، ولیزاده، م.، محفوظی، م. س. و شهریاری، ر. 1375. استفاده از شاخصهای فیزیولوژیک برای ارزیابی منابع مقاومت به خشکی در ارقام گندم. چکیده مقالات چهارمین کنگره علوم زراعت و اصلاح نباتات، دانشگاه صنعتی اصفهان، ص. 242.
4- حسنلی، ع. م. 1379. روشهای گوناگون اندازهگیری آب. مرکز نشر دانشگاه شیراز، 56 ص.
5- خواجوئی نژاد، ج. چ.، کاظمی، ح.، آلیاری، ح.، جوانشیر، ع. و آروین، م. ج. 1384. تأثیر سطوح مختلف آبیاری و تراکمهای گیاهی بر روی رشد و عملکرد ارقام سویا به عنوان کشت دوم. مجله علمی کشاورزی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، جلد 27، صفحات 67-88.
6- سالمی، ح. ر.، و افیونی، د. 1384. اثر تیمارهای کم آبیاری بر عملکرد و اجزای عملکرد دانه ارقام جدید گندم. مجله علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، شماره 3، ص.20-11.
7- کوچکی. ع.، و م. بنایان اول. 1373. فیزیولوژی عملکرد گیاهان زراعی (ترجمه). انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، 252 ص.
8. Ali, M., Jensen, C. R., Mogensen, V. O., Andersen, M. N., and Henson, I. E. 1999. Root signaling and osmotic adjustment during intermittent soil drying sustain grain yield of field grown wheat. Field Crops Research 62: 35-52.
9. Clark, J. M., Smith, T. F. T., Mc Caig, T. N., and Green, D. G. 1984. Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varying drought resistance. Crop Science 24: 537-541.
10. Fernandez, G. C. L. 1992. Effective criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetable and other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, Taiwan, Chapter 25: 257-270.
11. Fischer, R. A., and Maurer, R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journa of Agricultural Research 29: 897-912.
12. French, R. J., and Schultz, J. E. 1984. Water use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean-type environment. II. Some limitations of efficiency. Australian Journa of Agricultural Research 35: 765-775.
13. Gianta, F., Motzo, R., and Deidda, M. 1993. Effect of drought on yield and yield components of durum wheat and triticale in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research 33: 399-409.
14. Guttieri, M. J., Stark, J. C., O’Brien, K. and Souza, E. 2001. Relative sensitivity of spring wheat grain yield and quality parameters to moisture deficit. Crop Science 41: 327-335.
15. Johnson, R. C., Nguyen, H. T., and Croy, L. I. 1984. Osmotic adjustment and solute accumulation in two wheat genotypes differing in drought resistance. Crop Science 24: 951-962.
16. Moustafa, M. A., Boersma, L. B., and Kyonstad, W. E. 1996. Response of four spring wheat cultivars to drought stress. Crop Science 36: 982-986.
17. Mugabe, F. T., and Nyakatawa, E. Z. 2000. Effect of deficit irrigation on wheat and opportunities of grown wheat on residual soil moisture in Southeast Zimbabwe. agricultural. Water Management 46: 1111-1119.
18. Nakagami, K., Okawa, T. O., and Hirasawa, T. 2004. Effect of a reduction in soil moisture from one month before flowering through ripening on dry matter production and ecophysiological characteristics of wheat plants. Plant Production Science 7: 143-154.
19. Nourmand, F., Rostami, M. A., and Ghannadha, M. R. 2001. A study of morpho-physiological traits of bread wheat, relationship with grain yield under normal and drought stress conditions. Iranian Journal Agricultural Science 32: 185-194.
20. Robertson, M. J., and Giunta, F. 1994. Responses of spring wheat exposed to preanthesis water stress. Australian Journal Agricultural Research 45: 19-35.
21. Shaozhong, K., LU, Z., Xiaotao, Y. H., Huanjie, C., and Binjie, G. 2002. Effect of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess plateau of China. Agricultural Water Management 55: 203-216.
22. Wang, C.Y., Ma, Y., and Zhou, S. 1996. Study on effect of soil drought stress on winter wheat senescence. Acta Agricultural University of Henan 30: 309-313.
_||_