Examining the Role of the Physical Security Components in Creating a Place Attachment (A Case Study of Asman and Yasmin Residential Complexes in Maragheh)

Subject Areas :

Islam Karami ¹ , Leila Rahimi ² , Mehrnaz Bologhi ³ , Hadis Bordbar ⁴

1 - Faculty of architectural engineering and urbanism, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood. Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Ph.D. student, Department of Architecture, Ardabil Branch, Ardabil Islamic Azad University, Iran
4 - Ph.D. student, Department of Geography and Urban Planning, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran

Received: 2020-05-07 Accepted : 2020-05-26 Published : 2022-08-23

Keywords: Security, Maragheh, Place attachment, Residential Complexes,

Abstract :

Today, ignoring the principles and components of security in the design of residential complexes has led to a decrease in place attachment. The purpose of the current research is to improve the level of place attachment in the residential complexes of Maragheh through the physical components of security. The results of the research show that the condition of the physical components of security and place attachment in the residential complexes of Maragheh has been evaluated from the perspective of the residents as favorable and in an average-to-high condition. Also, there is a linear relationship between the components of security, except for the components of the quality of the living environment and proximity to uses, and place attachment. In terms of effectiveness, territorialization and monitoring components have the greatest impact on place attachment. 

References:

 

1. احمدی‌پور، ز.، میرزایی‌تبار، م. 1390. نقش احساس مکانی در سازماندهی سیاسی فضا. آمایش محیط، 12 (4): 62-47.


2. امیرکافی، م.، فتحی، ش. 1390. بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر دلبستگی به محله مسکونی نمونه مورد مطالعه: شهر کرمان. مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، 5 (13): 41-1.


3. البرزی، ف.، ظریف پور لنگرودی، آ.، سهیلی، ج. 1399. تبیین نقش نماهای شهری در ایجاد دلبستگی به مکان در بین شهروندان نمونه موردی: نماهای مسکونی شهر تهران. پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 40 (11): 232-217.

 

4. فتح بقالی، ع.، صنیعی‌پور، ح. 1395. تأثیر عناصر کالبد-فضایی (معماری) بر دلبستگی به مکان شهروندان در مجموعه بازار تبریز. آمایش محیط، 43 (11): 124-97.


5. فکوهی، ن.1390. همسازی و تعارض در هویت و قومیت. تهران، نشر گل آذین.


6. کشاورزی، گ.، جلالیان، س. 1398. تبیین نقش عوامل مؤثر بر قلمرویابی در ایجاد حس تعلق به مکان در مجموعه‌های مسکونی مطالعه موردی: مجموعه مسکونی اعتمادیه همدان. مطالعات محیطی هفت حصار، 27 (7):91-81.


7. میرزاحسین، س.، احمدی، م.، ذاکر حقیقی، ک. 1399. بررسی چگونگی ساختار و عوامل مؤثر بر زیست‌پذیری فضاهای شهری بر مبنای حس تعلق به مکان بین شهروندان تهرانی. آمایش محیط، 56 (15): 46-27.


8. Alimardani, M., Sharghi, A., Mahdneshin, N. 2017. Investigating the Role of Security in the Vitality and Nightlife of Urban Public Spaces. Quarterly Journal of Applied Arts, 3 (8): 15-26.


9. Beery, T., Jeonsson, K. I. 2017. Outdoor recreation and place attachment: Exploring the potential of outdoor recreation within a UNESCO biosphere reserve. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17(8): 54-63.


10. Comstock, N. L., Miriam, D., Marshall, J., Mah-J, S., Marks Michad, B., Jill, S. 2015. Neighborhood attachment and its correlates: Exploring neighborhood conditions. Collective efficacy and gardening. Journal of environmental psychology, 13(17):1-8


11. Devine-Wright, A., Price, C. 2015. Explaining “NIMBY” objections to a power line: The role of personal. place attachment and project-related factors. Journal of Environment and Behavior, 45(6): 761–


12. Di Masso, A., Williams, D. R., Raymond, C. M., Buchecker, M., Degenhardt, B., Devine- Wright, P., Stedman, R. 2019. Between fixities and flows: Navigating place attachments in an increasingly mobile world. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(61): 125–133.


13. Guardia, J., Pol, E. 2016. A critical study of theoretical models of sustainability through structural equation systems. Journal of Environment and Behavior, 34 (10): 137–149.


14. Izadifar, I., Yazdanfar, S.A., Hosseini, S.B., Norouzian Maleki, S. 2016. Relationship between Support of Social Activities and Fear of Crime in Iran Residential Complex. Journal of Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 170(10):575 – 585


15. Karsono, B., Indira, S. S., Deni, C. 2016. The SignifIcance of Uniqueness, Comfort, Security and Safety to Place Attachment. Journal of Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 78(5): 179–183.


16. Lewicka, M. 2012. Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(8): 207-230.


17. Lu, T., Zhang, F., Wu, F. 2018. Place attachment in gated neighbourhoods in China: Evidence from Wenzhou. Journal of Geoforum, 92(30):144–151.


18. Mazumdar, S., Mazumdar, S. 2014. Religion and place attachment: A study of sacred places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(21): 385-397.


19. Moayedi, M., Ali Nejad, M., Navaei, H. 2013. Investigating the Role of Urban Landscape Components in Promoting the Level of Safety in Urban Public Spaces. Journal of Social Security Studies, 31(35): 159-191.


20. Pakzad, J. 2005. Theoretical Basis and Urban Design Process. Tehran, Shahidi.


21. Rahmania, M., Mahmoody Zarandib, M. 2015. Determine the Environmental Factors Influencing Increase Security in Residential Design. Journal of Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201(120): 234 – 242.


22. Ramkinssoon, H., Weiler, B., Smith, G. 2012. Place attachment and proenvironmental behavior in national parks: the development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(2): 257-276.


23. Raymond, C., Brown, G., Robinson, G. 2019. The influence of place attachment and moral and normative concerns on the conservation of native vegetation: a test of two behavioural models. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(5): 323-335.


24. Salamati Zare, A. 2014. Urban Design in Contrast to Creating a Sense of Security in the Individual. National Conference on Architecture, Urban Development and Sustainable Development with a Focus on Reading Iran-Islamic Identity.


25. Scannell, L., Gifford, R. 2010b. The relations between natural and civic place attachment and pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3): 289-297.


26. Scannell, L., Gifford, R. 2017. Place attachment enhances psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Environment and Behavior, 18(49): 359–389.


27. Shamsuddin, S., Zaini, K., Bashri, A. 2014. Effectiveness of Gated Communities in Providing Safe Environments for Children’s Outdoor Use. Journal of Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 42(140): 77 – 85.


28. Shaykh-Baygloo, R. 2020. A multifaceted study of place attachment and its influences on civic involvement and place loyalty in Baharestan new town. Iran, Tehran.


29. Siti Rasidah, M. S., Johari, N., Mohd Sallah, M. N. 2013. Perception of safety in gated and non-gated neighborhoods. Journal of Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11(85): 383-391.


30. 2017.Sense of Place and Place- Based Introductory.


31. Toruńczyk-Ruiz, S., Martinović, B. 2020. The bright and dark sides of length of residence in the neighbourhood: Consequences for local participation and openness to newcomers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67(30): 101-383.


32. Vasile, C., Margaritoiu, A., Eftimie, S. 2018. Security needs among teachers. Journal of Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29(11): 1251-1256.


33. Yaran, A., Hadavi, P. 2018. Investigating the Design Indicators for Increasing the Security of Inhabitants in High-rise Residential Complexes in Tehran. Journal of Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 11(24): 53-67.


34. Zen, I., Ali Mohamad, N. A. 2014. Adaptation of defensible space theory for the enhancement of kindergarten landscape. Journal of Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153(80): 23-35.