Investigating the Impact of Contemporary Housing Indoor Dimensions on Residents' Satisfaction

Subject Areas :

Mohammad Sadegh  Taher Tolou Del ¹ (Associate Professor, Architecture Department, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran. Iran.)
Esmaeil  Zarghami ² (Associate Professor, Architecture Department, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urban Planning, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran.)
OMID  Heidaripour ³ (PhD Student from faculty of architectural engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University. Tehran, Iran)
Sina  Kamali Tabrizi ⁴ (Ph.D., Architecture Department, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2020-03-09 Accepted : 2020-05-14 Published : 2022-05-22

Keywords: Residential satisfaction, space dimensions, apartment housing, interior housing spaces, residence duration,

Abstract :

Housing satisfaction can be considered as one of the most important and complex issues in the field of housing that has a variety of components. This concept is also divided into different dimensions by different researchers as one of the most important subjective aspects of quality of life. Physical factors of housing are one of the constituents of residents' quality of life and residential satisfaction. One of the most prominent features of physical factors is the dimensions and sizes of residential units, which due to the increase in housing density and consequently the reduction of residential infrastructure under consideration. Another manifestation of satisfaction with residence is the desire to stay longer, which has been one of the key determinants of satisfaction in various studies. Accordingly, based on the literature on the subject, the purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of dimensions of contemporary housing interiors on residents 'satisfaction and consequently residents' residence. The main approach of quantitative research is surveying in three sections, dimensions of housing spaces, residential satisfaction and desire to stay more with the statistical population of contemporary dwellers. Contemporary Housing Pattern Under the survey, the most common housing pattern in large cities, namely conventional residential housing with a limited number of units, is below 10 units in Isfahan. The control variables of the study are housing type and length of stay; That said, the type of housing is intended to be a 10-unit apartment and a residence of more than one year. According to Clinger's sample size, 250 variables were considered as 5 variables. Finally, the final sample size was 270. The reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed by Crombach's alpha technique and content validity based on expert opinion. Finally, based on the conceptual model defined throughout the research background, the structural model between dimensions of indoor spaces, residential satisfaction and desire for residence was further elucidated and the relationships were evaluated based on the results of the survey, based on the software.

References:

 

• ابدالی، ی. رضویان، م. علی پوری، ا. نادی زاده، ش. 1399. ارزیابی میزان رضایت‌مندی ساکنان از کیفیت مجتمع‌های مسکن مهر (مطالعه موردی: شهر نورآباد). آمایش محیط، 13(51)؛ 43- 62.


• آجیلیان ممتاز، ش. رفیعیان، م. آقا صفری، ع. 1395. اصول، ابعاد و متغیرهای رضایتمندی سکونتی در برنامه‌ریزی مسکن مهر، مطالعه موردی: شهرک مهرگان. فصلنامه علمی-پژوهشی مطالعات شهری، 19؛ 27-36.


• امیرکافی، م. فتحی، ش. 1390. بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر دل‌بستگی به محله مسکونی مطالعه موردی شهر کرمان. مجله مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، 5(1)؛ 1-26.


• پوردیهیمی، ش. نورتقانی، ع. 1392. هویت و مسکن: بررسی سازوکار تعامل هویت ساکنین و محیط مسکونی. فصلنامه مسکن و محیط روستا، 141؛ 3-18.


• رفیعیان، م. امین صاحی، ا. تقوایی، ع. 1389. سنجش کیفیت محیط سکونت در شهرک اکباتـان تهـران. برنامه‌ریزی و آمایش فضا، 14(4)؛ 63-85.


• رفیعیان، م. عسگری زاده، ز. عسگری زاده، م. 1388. ارزیابی میزان کیفیت مجتمع‌های سکونتی با تأکید بر رویکرد رضایتمندی در محله نواب. مجله پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 67؛ 53-68.


• شعبانی، م. 1395. تأثیر شاخصه‌های اجتماعی بر رضایتمندی سکونتی ساکنان مناطق مرکزی پاریس. فصلنامه هنر و تمدن شرق، 4(12).


• طاهرطلوع دل، م. حیدری پور، ا. 1398. مدل جامع‌نگر شاخص‌های کیفیت زندگی در محیط‌های سکونتی، پژوهش منتشرنشده. دانشگاه شهید رجایی تهران.


• عباس زاده، ش. گوهری، ف. عسگری رابری، ا. 1395. بررسی تأثیر عوامل کیفیت محیطی بر رضایتمندی ساکنان در مجتمع‌های مسکونی در مشهد. پژوهش‌های جغرافیای برنامه‌ریزی شهری، 4(4)؛ 53-67.


• علی پور، د. شهابیان، پ. 1398. ارزیابی عوامل مؤثر بر رضایتمندی از کیفیت محیطی محلات مسکونی (نمونه موردی: شهر جدید پردیس). آمایش محیط، 12(46)؛ 21-40.


• فیالکوف، ی. 1383. جامعه‌شناسی شهر، ترجمه عبدالحسین نیک گهر، تهران: انتشارات آگه.


• گیفورد، ر. 1378. روانشناسی محیط‌های مسکونی، ترجمه وحید قبادیان. فصلنامه معماری و فرهنگ، 3؛ 71-98.


• نوری، م. اسدپور، ک. 1395. تبیین عوامل مؤثر بر میزان رضایتمندی ساکنان مسکن مهر از وضعیت سکونت؛ مطالعه موردی: شهر دهاقان. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 18؛ 63-76.


• Amérigo, M. Aragonés, J. Residential Satisfaction in Council Housing. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 10; 313-325.


• Amérigo, M. Aragonés, J. 1997. A Theoretical and Methodological Approach to the Study of Residential Satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology,17; 47-57.


• Basolo, V. Strong, D. 2002. Understanding the neighborhood: From residents’ perceptions and needs to action. Housing Policy Debate, 13(1); 83–105.


• Bonaiuto, M. Aiello, A. Perugini, M. Bonnes, M. Ercolani, A. 1999. Multidimensional Perception of Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in the Urban Environment.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19; 331-352.


• Bonaiuto, M. Fornara, F. Bonnes, M. 2006. Perceived Residential Environment Quality In middle- And low-Extension Italian Cities, Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée. European Review of Applied Psychology, 56; 23-34.


• Campbell, A. Converse, P.E. Rodgers, W.L. 1976. The Quality of American Life. Russell Sage Foundation, New York.


• Canter, David V. 1977. The Psychology of Place, London,Architectural Press.


• Choudhury, I. 2005. A Conceptual Model of Resident Satisfaction with Reference to Neighborhood Composition.


• Choudhury, I. 2005. A Conceptual Model of Resident Satisfaction with Reference to Neighborhood Composition. World Congress on Housing: Transforming Housing Environments


• Connerly, C., & Marans, R. W. 1988. Neighborhood Quality: A Description and Analysis of Indicators, In E. Huttman & W. Vleit (Eds.), The US Handbook on Housing and Built Environment, pp.37-62. Westwood: Greenwood Press.


• Dekker, K., de Vos, S., Musterd, S. & van Kempen, R. 2011. Residential satisfaction in housing estates in European cities: A multi-level research approach. Housing Studies, 26(04); 479–499.


• Foote, N. 1960. Housing Choices and Housing Constraints, New York: McGraw-Hill.


• Francescato, G., Weidemann, S., and Anderson, J.R. 1987. Residential Satisfaction: Its Uses and Limitations in Housing Research, in van Vliet-, W., H. Choldin, W. Michelson, and D. Popenoe (eds.) Housing and Neighborhoods, Theoretical and Empirical Contributions, New York: Greenwood Press.


• Galster, G. C. Hesser, G.W. 1981. Residential Satisfaction Composition and Contextual Correlates. Environment and Behavior, 13 (6): 735-758.


• Ge, Jian. Kazunori, H. 2006. Research on residential lifestyles in Japanese cities from the viewpoints of residential preference, residential choice and residential satisfaction. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), 9.


• Ghosh, S. 2006. Residential Differentiation, Mobility and Satisfaction.


• Gifford, R. 1999. Perception and Recognition Environmental. Translated Dehbashy. Architectural and Cultural Journal, 2-3(1):21-29.


• Gordon Show, J. Transit. 1994. Density and Residential Satisfaction, University of California at Berkeley.


• Hui, E.C. Zheng, X. 2010. “Measuring customer satisfaction of FM service in housing sector: a structural equation model approach”, Facilities, 28(5/6); 306-320.


• Kearney AR. 2006. Residential development patterns and neighborhood satisfaction: impacts of density and nearby nature. Environment and Behavior 38(1):112–139.


• Kellekci, O. Berkoz, L. 2005. Determinants of userss atisfaction and environment quality:sample of Istanbul metropolitan area, Istanbul technical university,faculty of architecture, Department of Urban and Regional Planning, 1-18.


• Lansing, J. B. Marans, R.W. 1969. Evaluation of Neighborhood Quality, AIP Journal, 11; 195-199.


• Li, S. Song, Y. 2009. Redevelopment, displacement, housing conditions, and residential satisfaction: A study of Shanghai, Environment and Planning, 41(5), 1090–1108.


• McCrea, R., Stimson, R. J., Western, J. (2005). Testing a General Model of Satisfaction with Urban Living Using Data for South East Queensland. Australia, Social Indicators Research, 72; 121-152.


• Mesch, Gustavo S. Manor, O. 1998. Social Ties, Environmental Perception, and Local Attachment. Journal of Environment And Behavior, 30; 504-519.


• Mohit, M. A., Ibrahim, M. Rashid, Y. R. 2010. Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Habitat International, 34(1); 18–27.


• Mohit, M. Azim, M. 2012. Assessment of residential satisfaction with public housing in hulhumale, procedia - social and behavioral sciences, 1-17.


• Morris, E. W. Winter, M. 1978. Housing, Family, and Society. New York: Wiley.


• Mulder, C. H. Hooimeijer, P. 1999. Residential Relocations in the Life Course. Wissenm, L. J. G., Dykstra, P. A., eds.(. Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus, pp. 159-178. New York: Kluwer.


• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and Berry, L.L. 1985. “A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research”, Journal of Marketing, 49, 41-.05.


• Potter J and Cantarero R. 2006. How does ıncreasing population and diversity affect resident satisfaction? Environment and Behavior 38(5):605–625.


• Rezaei, M.R & Komaei zade, Y., 2012. Evaluating quality of life among resident in Mehr housing projects, A case study of Fatemieh housing site in Yazd, Yazd provience, Iran, Motaleat shahri journal, No.5, p13-26. [In Persian]


• Sam, M. Zain, F.M. Zain O. Saadatian. 2012. Residential satisfaction; Meaning and interpretation Business Engineering and Industrial Applications Colloquium (BEIAC), IEEE  Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia , 279–283.


• Tan Teck-Hong. 2012. Housing satisfaction in medium- and high-cost housing: The case of Greater Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Habitat International, 36(1); 108– 116.


• Van Poll R. 1997. The Perceived Quality of the Urban Residential Environment. A Multiattribute Evaluation. PhD thesis, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, The Netherlands,


• Yang, Y. 2008. A tale of two cities: Physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte, Journal of the American Planning Association, 74(3); 307–323.


• Zamzuri, N.H., Mohamed, N. and Hussein, R. 2008. “Antecedents of customer satisfaction in repurchase intention in the electronic commerce environment”, International Symposium on Information Technology (ITSim 2008), Kuala Lumpur, 22-26.