A knowledge city: Strategies for future development of Zanjan as a Sustainable and creative city
Subject Areas :عیسی پوررمضان 1 , حمید پورحسین روشن 2 , صدیقه علی اکبری 3
1 - عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رشت، گروه جغرافیا
2 - دانشجوی دکتری دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
3 - کارشناسی ارشد شهرسازی، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، گروه طراحی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد قزوین، قزوین
Keywords: Zanjan, macro development pattern, knowledge city design requirement, Key word: knowledge city,
Abstract :
Knowledge is the most valuable asset to have an advantage in the knowledge economy. Many cities worldwide present themselves as ‘knowledge cities’ and try to attract knowledge-based businesses and knowledge workers. Other cities are busy designing strategies and plans to become a knowledge city. In order to become a successful knowledge city, it is important to know what the main formal spatial and functional spatial requirements could be. The formal spatial requirements deal with the physical elements of the city. The functional spatial requirements are the amenities and activities that take place. Because of the placement of the communication path Tehran - Tabriz - Europe, a communication network, highway, rail, air and being located within a radius of 120 km from Tehran, industrial infrastructure of national and regional scale and potential industrial overflows Tehran, having relevant aspects of the cultural and historical tourist attractions, natural and ecotourism and numerous academic centers and office Excellence in physics... zanjan has conditions for attracting private investors and the city''s creative class. In this study, two macro patterns for future development of the city is considered, After describing the patterns, they were scored based on AHP model, Finally macro desired pattern, then the pattern of future development (knowledge base) was introduced. A comprehensive review of the city showed this city has necessary conditions of foundation of knowledge city.
1) حاتمی، د.، عربی، ز.، رحمانی، ا. 1395. مکان یابی بهینه فضای سبز شهری با استفاده ازمدل Logic Fuzzy وAHP، در محیط GIS (نمونه موردی: شهر مشهد)، فصلنامه آمایش محیط، دوره 9، شماره 32: 63-84.
2) شاه حسینی، پ.، توکلی، ه. 1393. تحلیل شاخص های کیفیت زندگی شهری مورد: محله وردآورد منطقه 21 شهر تهران، فصلنامه آمایش محیط، دوره 7، شماره 24: 127-144.
3) نقش محیط، مهندسان مشاور.1393. طرح جامع شهر زنجان، گزارش مطالعات پیشنهادی طرح جامع: 560-235
4) معاونت برنامهریزی استانداری زنجان. 1391. سالنامه آماری استان زنجان.
5) ملکی، س.، احمدی، ر. 1395. تأثیر عامل فاصله از مرکز بر میزان توسعه یافتگی شهرستانهای استان خوزستان، فصلنامه آمایش محیط، دوره 9، شماره 32: 22-1.
6) Bu-Anzeh, N. & Ledraa, T. 2007. Planning the Knowledge city: Can it be an option for Riyadh? The 2nd International Symposium on KNOWLEDGE CITIES: Future of Cities in the Knowledeg Economy ,pp :3-5
7) Baum, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Horton, S., Velibeyoglu, K. & Gleeson, B. 2007. The role of community and lifestyle in the making of a knowledge city, Brisbane, Griffith University. Urban Research Program Practice and Policy Paper 2.pp: 10
8) 8- Berg, L. van den, Pol, P.M.J., Winden, W. van & Woets, P. 2005. European cities in the knowledge economy. Aldershot, England, Ashgate Publishing limites. pp:80-120
9) 9- Dvir, R. & Pasher, E. 2004. Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective. Journal of knowledge management ,Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 16-27.
10) 10- Dvir, R., Schwartzberg, Y., Avni, H., Webb, C. & Lettice, F. 2006. The future center as an urban innovation engine. Journal of knowledge management ,Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 110-123.
11) Edvinsson, L. 2006. Aspects on the city as a knowledge tool. Journal of knowledge management , Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 6-13.
12) Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K., Psarras, J. & Askounis, D. 2006a. A unified methodological approach for the development of knowledge cities. Journal of Knowledge management ,Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 65-78.
13) Ergazakis, K., Metaxiotis, K. & Psarras, J. 2006b. A coherent framework for building successful KCs in the context of the knowledge-based economy. Knowledge management research and practice ,February 2006, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 46-59.
14) Evans, G., Foord, J., Gertler, M., Tesolin, L. & Weinstock, S. 2006. Strategies for creative spaces and cities: lessons learned, London & Toronto, Cities institute, London Metropolitan University & Munk centre for international studies, University of Toronto. pp:60-65
15) Florida, R. 2002. The rise of the creative class and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Perseus books group. pp:250-257
16) Helbrecht, I. 2004. Bare geographies in knowledge societies, creative cities as text and piece of art: two eyes, one vision. Built environment ,, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 194-203.
17) Laszlo, K.C. & Laszlo, A. 2007. Fostering a sustainable learning society through knowledge-based development. Systems research and behavioral science, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 493-503.
18) Winden, W. Van, Berg, L. Van den & Pol, P. 2008. European cities in the knowledge economy, towards a typology. Urban studies , Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 525-549.
19) Yigitcanlar, T., O’Connor, K. & Westerman, C. 2008. The making of knowledge cities: Melbourne’s knowledge-based urban development experience. Cities , Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 63-72.
_||_
