Combination of AHP and TOPSIS methods to prioritize of flooding in Taleghan sub watersheds

Subject Areas : forest

Samaneh  Razavizadeh ¹ (فارغ التحصیل/ دانشگاه ساری)
کاکا  شاهدی ² (استادیار دانشگاه کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری)

Received: 2016-05-04 Accepted : 2016-08-27 Published : 2017-02-19

Keywords: TOPSIS, AHP, Watershed Management, flooding potential, Taleghan watershed,

Abstract :

Flood is one of the natural disasters which every year cause to great life and property damage in different parts of world. Determination and prioritization of flooding in sub-watersheds with the aim of setting priorities in policy and management practices, is of utmost importance. In present study sub-watersheds of Taleghan watershed based on flooding potential were prioritized using AHP and TOPSIS techniques. Criteria considered for prioritization were the most important criteria affecting on rainfall infiltration, runoff and flooding potential. They include sub-watershed area, compactness coefficient, drainage density, average slope of sub watershed, mean elevation of sub watershed, the percentage of impervious area, curve number, main channel slope, main channel length, and concentration time. Results indicated that the three criteria of impervious area, CN and main channel slope, respectively, with relative weights of 0.283, 0.231 and 0.163 were the most significant parameters relating to flooding potential in sub watershed. The final results derived from combination of AHP and TOPSIS also showed that among the 16 sub-watersheds of Taleghan, three sub-watersheds of Hasanjun, Narian and Shahrak, respectively, have the highest potential of flooding.

References:

References

 

1. Amani, F., 1998. Feasibility of flooding. Master Thesis, Shahid Beheshti University, pp 182.( In Persian).

2. Ananda, J. 2007. Implementing Participatory Decision Making in Forest planning, Environmental management. 39: 534-544.

3. Badri, B., R. Zareh Bidaki, A. Honarbakhsh, & F. Atashkhar, 2016. Prioritization of flooding potential in Beheshtabad subbasins, Natural Geographic Researches, 48 (1): 143-158. .( In Persian)

 4. Eastman, J.R. 2006. IDRISI Andes, Guide to GIS and image processing. Clark labs, Clark University.

5. Ghaemi, H., 1994. Studies to supplementary identification of watershed project in Karkheh watershed. Watershed management department of the Ministry of Jihad, pp 195.( In Persian).

6. Hassanzadeh, Y. and Aalami, M.T. 2005. An investigation of reasons for the occurrence of Golestan flood and the methods of its preventation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geohazards, Natural Disasters and Methods of Confronting with them, Tabriz, Iran, PP: 39-40. ( In Persian)

7.Izanlou, H., 2006. Time and Place priority of flooding in in Kooshak Abad sub watersheds using HEC-HMS model. Master Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, pp 76.( In Persian)

8. Jokar, J., 2002. Assessment of flooding in Shapour river sub basins using simulated flood flows. Master Thesis, ،Tehran University, pp 157.( In Persian)

9. Karimi Zadeh, K. 2009. Technical assessment of watershed management measures effects on flood ( Case study: Sira- Kalvan watershed), Watershed Management MSc thesis, p. 104. ( In Persian)

10. Khosroshahi, M., 2001. Determination of the role of sub basins in the severity of basin flooding (Case study: Damavand basin). PhD Thesis, ،Tarbiat Modares University, pp 177. ( In Persian)

11. Mahdavi, M., 1999. Applied Hydrology, Tehran University Publishers, 401 pp.

12. Mohammadi Motlagh, R., N. Jalalkamali, & A. Jalalkamali, 2013. Study of contribution role of sub-basin in intense flooding; Case Study: Dalaki basin in Fars Province, Irrigation and Water Engineering Journal, 4 (13): 31-44.( In Persian)

13. Momeni, M., 2010. New Topics in Operations Research. 352 pp.

14. Nasiri Ghidari, A., A.A. Montazeri, & M. Momeni., 2010. Ensemble AHP and TOPSIS in determination of relative weights of criteria and assessment of drainage and irrigation networks. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 4(2): 284-296.( In Persian)

15. Oujan, M., H. Jalilian, & Gh. Rostaminzad, 2008. AHP, an approach to watershed management. The third conference of Water Resources Management, Tabriz University.

16. Razavizadeh, S., 2010. Land use change Scenarios and their effects on flood features using HEC-HMS model (Case study: Taleghan watershed). Master Thesis, ،Tehran University, pp 157.( In Persian)

17. Saaty, R.W. 2003. Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, PA.

18. Saghafian, B. & H. Farazjoo, 2007. Determine flood-producing areas and prioritization of flooding in the hydrologic units of Golestan dam basin. Iran-Watershed Management Science & Engineering Journal, 1(1): 1-11.( In Persian)

19. Salajegheh, A., S. Razavizadeh, & S. Salajegheh, 2010. Priority of flooding in Tangab sub basins in Fars province, using Scalogram model. The first international conference on plant, water, soil 7 weather modeling, Kerman, Iran.( In Persian)

20. Samari, D., H. Azadi, K. Zarafshani, G. Hosseininia, & F. Witlox, 2012. Determining appropriate forestry extension model: Application of AHP in the Zagros area, Iran. Forest Policy and Economics, 15, 91-97.( In Persian)

21. Shabanlou, S, & F. Yosefvand, 2015. Calculation of sub-basin participation in total flood of Golestan basin, Golestan, Iran, Agricultural Communications, 3(2): 54-62.( In Persian)

22. Solaimani, K., M. Bashir Gonbad., S.R. Mousavi, & Sh. Khalighi Sigaroudi, 2008. Production potential of flooding in the basins using HEC-HMS model in GIS environment [case study: Kesilian basin], Natural Geographic Researches, p. 60-51.( In Persian)

23. Soleimani Sardoo, F., 2009. Priority of  effective regions on flood peak by using of RS & GIS Techniques and HEC-HMS model at Halilrud, Isfahan University of Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, p. 130.( In Persian).