Compiling an appropriate pattern for staff performance assessment in Tabriz Islamic Azad University

Subject Areas : Educational Psychology

Ferdous  Yadegari ¹ (عضو هیات علمی و استاد یار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رود هن)
Mir Mohsen  Alavi ² (معاون آموزشی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی مرکزگوگان)

Received: 2016-04-16 Accepted : 2016-04-16 Published : 2008-03-20

Keywords: Flexibility, Professional Development, Performance Assessment, occupational criteria, professional covenant, Human Relations, ethical criteria and extra-curricular,

Abstract :

     The main objective of the present study is to compile an appropriate pattern for staff performance assessment in Islamic Azad University. The study tries to answer the following questions: What are the university staff's performance indices? To promote the university staff's performance what model can be presented? What would be the proportion degree of suggested model?        The statistical population was all the staff at Tabriz Islamic Azad University (total 640 people), from witch 250 people have been chosen using proportionate stratified sampling. The research method was descriptive survey.        After extensive study of theoretical bases and research literature and obtaining the wieo points of valid scholars, the questionnaire was conformed and its six components (occupational criteria, professional development, professional covenant, human relations, flexibility, ethical criteria and extra-curricular) and thirty variables were recognized by professors and scholars. Reliability of the research was calculated by cronbach alpha witch was 44% for descriptive data, statistical indices, tables and charts related to each question are presented. For analyzing the data, one sample Ttest and Friedman was used for first question. The second question factor analysis and the third question cronbach alpha via SPSS soft ware was used.      The research result showed that all six components and thirty variables were confirmed. Suggessted research model with reliability coefficient 44% and average of 3.44 out of five was also confirmed. The human relations criteria was known as the most important components because it has the most factor loading and had the tendency to become a public and total factor. The professional developent criteria was known as the least important component in the present research.

References:

-بازرگان دلمقانی ، فریدون(1354)تاریخ آموزش و پرورش ایران : انتشارات دانشگاه تهران.

-دفتر نظارت و ارزیابی آموزش عالی(1372)نظارت و ارزیابی آموزش عالی ایران:انتشارات وزارت فرهنگ و آموزش عالی.

-علاقه‌بند، علی(1371)مقدمات مدیریت آموزشی، تهران: انتشارات بعثت.

-قورچیان، نادرقلی، خورشیدی، عباس(1379)شاخصهای عملکردی در ارتقاء کیفی مدیریت نظام آموزش عالی، تهران: انتشارات فراشناختی اندیشه.

- مصطفی(1377) نظارت و راهنمایی تعلیماتی،تهران ،انتشارات رشد.

-Anderson, Alan, H.(1993)Successful Training Practice, a Manager’s Guide to Personal Development, New Delhi, Blackwater Publishing

-Borden and Banta.(1994)Using Performance Indicators to guide strategic decisionmaking. Sanfrancisco, Jossy Bass Publishers,

-David Riply(1990)Trends in Management, London, Prentic Hall Publishing..

 -Cave, M. and Hanng, S.(1992)Performance Indicators, Clark and Neave, the Encyclopedia of Higher Education, Oxford, Pergamon Press,

-Feirsen, R.(1994)Are Principals Pbsolete? Executive Educator, September/October

-Kotter, John,(1999)What Effective General Mangers Really Do, Harvard Business Review, March/April

- Luthans, Fred(1995)Prganizational Behavior, 4 Ed. New York, McGraw Hill,

 Alexandria, VirginiaLuthans, Fred(1995) organizational Behavior, 4^th Ed. New York, McGraw Hill,

-Mintzberg, Henry(1973)Managing on the Edge, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 10, Issue 3. 1997.

-Cave,M.and Hanng,S(1993) Performance Indicators, Clark and Neave, the Encyclopedia of  Higher Education, Oxford, Pergamon Press,.