Comparison of different methods for ectoparasite infestation detection in Laboratory bred animals and standardization of their health certificate

Subject Areas : Veterinary Clinical Pathology

mohammad Abdigoudarzi ¹

1 - رئیس آزمایشگاه رفرانس کنه‌شناسی، موسسه تحقیقات واکسن و سرم‌سازی رازی.

Received: 2013-12-24 Accepted : 2014-06-24 Published : 2014-05-22

Keywords: Screening, External parasites, Laboratory animals, Health certificate,

Abstract :

In order to study external parasites of laboratory reared animals at Razi institute, different methods including brushing of animal's surface body, cellophane tape of body surface, peri-anal cellophane tape test (CTT) and skin scrapings and digestive method were applied and collected samples were studied. In addition, field collected rats were tested using brushing method. One mouse had been infested by some mites. Rabbits, rats, mice and guinea pigs had not been infested with external parasites. Field collected rats had been highly infested with mites from the family Laelapidae. The, brushing method was confirmed to be a useful method for mite detection. According to the methods used in this study and these recommended by SOP from international animal breeding centers the CTT method was proposed to be useful for preparing health certificate of laboratory animals at the department of laboratory animal breading at Razi institute.  

References:

• Abai, M.R., Motabar, M., Vatandoost, H. and Javadian, E. (2002). The first case report of rat mite dermatitis due to Ornithonyssus bacoti in Southern I. R. Iran Abstracts and Posters.


• ACBA. (1999). American cavy breeders Association, Care of Guinea Pigs. Available in:www.acbaonline.com


• Felasa. (2002). Recommendation for the health monitoring of rodent and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units, Lab. Animals Ltd. Lab. Animals (36), pp: 20-42


• Felasa. (2013). Approved Health Monitoring Report, Felasa Working Group on Animal Health   (parasitological infections). Available in: www.felasa.eu


• Fremont, J.J. and Bowman, D.D. (2003) Parasites of Guinea Pigs. Available in:www.Ivis.Org


• Harikrishnan, V. S. (2009) Incidence of Chirodiscoides caviae in laboratory rats- Screening, Identification and Treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science, 36(2): 147-153.


• Kamali, K., Ostovan, H.
  and Atamehr, A. (2001) A catalog of mites and ticks (Acari) of Iran, Islamic Azad University, ScientificPublicationCenter, 192 pp.


• LYNX Guinea. (2006). A medical care guide for Guinea pigs, Home medical reference, parasites. Available in: http://www.guinealynx.info/parasites.html

• Nemati, A.R. (1999). A faunistic survey of Laelapidae (Acari: Mesostigmata) mites in Ahwaz Region. M. Sc. thesis, College of Agric., ShahidChamranUniversity, Ahwaz, Iran, 195 pp.

• SOP (Standard operating procedures) (2013). Comparative Medicine Laboratory animal facilities, SOP for animal Health monitoring program conventional facility, SOP for animals. Available in: http://www.mcgill.ca


• Tajedin, L. et al. (2009) Study on ectoparasites of Rhombomys opimus, the main reservoir of Zoonotic Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in endemic foci in Iran. Iranian Journal of Arthropod-Borne Disease, 3(1): 41-45.


• Wilamowski, A., Moran, S. and Greenburg, Z. (2002). Commensal rodents and their parasites in Israel.


• Yang, P. et al. (2009) Ectoparasitic arthropods occurring on Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus collected from two properties on the Island of Oahu, Hawaii (Acarina, Siphonaptera and Anuplura), Proceeding of Hawaiian Entomological Society 41: 53-56.