The Effect of Interaction on Lexical Acquisition
Subject Areas : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies
1 - Islamic Azad University of Takestan
Keywords:
Abstract :
De la Fuente, M.J., 2003. Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effect of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted LanguageLearning, 16(1): 47-81
Gass ,S.M. and E.M. Varonis, 1986. Sex differences in non-native speaker/non-native speaker interactions.
Kitade, K., 2000. L2 learners'discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internetchat Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(2): 143-166
Laufer, B. and J. Hulstijn, 2001. Incidental Vocabulary acquisition in a SL: The construct of task- induced involvement. Applied Lingguistics, 22(1):1-26.
Long, M.H. and P.Robinson, 1998. Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. In C.Doughty & J. Williams(Eds.) , Focus on form in SLA (pp.15-41).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pica, T., 1994 . Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about SLL conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning , 44(3): 493-527.
Pica, T.,R. Kanagy and J. Falodun, 1993. Choosing and using communication tasks for SL
Porter , P.A., 1986. How learners talk to each other: Input and interaction in task-centered discussions. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: conversation in SLA. Rowley, MA: Newbury House., pp:184-199
Swain , M., 4005. The output hypothesis: Theory and research . In E. Hinkel(Ed.), Handbook on research in SLT and learning. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.,pp:471-484
Ellis,R.(2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford:OUP.
Fitz, M.(2006). Discourse and participation in ESL face-to-face and Written electronic conferences. Language Learning &Technology, 10(1), 67-86.
Gass, S., &Varonis,E.(1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in SLA ,16,283-302.
