The Effects of Metacognitive Prompting and Structured Peer Interaction on Intermediate EFL learners' Collaborative Writing

Subject Areas : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies

Seyedeh Zohreh  Pirooz ¹ (Islamic Azad University, Takestan Branch)

Received: 2013-09-10 Accepted : 2013-10-15 Published : 2013-11-01

Keywords:

References:

• Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. NY: Oxford University Press.Retrieved on May 1, 2010 from: www.etd.lib.ttu.edu/theses/ available/etd-01072009-31295011741757/unrestricted/31295011741757.pdf.

 

• Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, 2^nd ed., New York: San Francisco State University.

 

• Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching, 2^nd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.


• Chastain, K. (1988). Developing second language skills, 3^rd ed., US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers.    

 

• Norman, D. G. (2005). Using STAD in an EFL elementary school classroom in south Korea.: Effects on student achievement, motivation, and attitudes toward cooperative learning. Asian EFL Journal, 35(3), 419-454. 

 

• Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261-297.   

                                                                          

• Griffiths, C. (2007). Language learning strategies: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions. ELT Journal, 61, 91-99.

 

• Griffiths, C., & J. Parr. (2001). Language-learning strategies: Theory and perception. ELTJournal, 55(3), 247–254.

 

• Gu, P., Hu, G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Investigating language learner strategies among.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       


• Hsiao, T-Y., & Oxford, R. L. (2002). Comparing theories of language learning strategies: Aconfirmatory factor analysis. Modern Language Journal, 86(3), 368-383.

 

• Peacock, M., & Ho, B. (2003). Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13, 179-200.

 

• BRATCHER, S. (1994). Evaluating children’ s writing: a handbook of communication choices for classroom teachers. New York: St Martin’ s Press.

 

• BURNS, S.M. & CASBERGUE, R. (1992). Parent-child interaction in a letter writing context. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24,CAMPBELL, R. (Ed.) (1998).

 

• SCHULTZ, K. (1997). `Do you want to be in my story?’ : collaborative writing in an urban elementary classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 253± 288.

 

• TOPPING, K.J. (1995). Paired reading, spelling and writing: the handbook for teachers and parents. London:Cassell.

 

• TOPPING, K.J. (2000). Peer assisted learning: a practical guide for teachers. Cambridge MA: Bookline Books.

 

• Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

 

• Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R. T., & Nelson, D. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Education Resources Information Center, 89(1), 47-62.

 

• Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, and Other More Mysterious Mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert and R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, Motivation, and Understanding (pp.65-109). Hilldale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.