Interpretation of the Concept of Public Interest, Accordance with the Thoughts of Who Advocate Constitutionalism with Emphasis on the Opinion of Sheikh Ismael Mahallti Gravy.
Subject Areas : Political and International Researches QuarterlyNazanin Zahra Broghani 1 , Seyyed Mohammadreza Ahmadi Tabatabaei 2 , jalal dorakhshah 3
1 - Political Science (Political Thought) Department of Political Science, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Science, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Political Science, Faculty of Islamic Education and Political Science, Imam Sadegh (AS) University, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3 - عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه امام صادق Department of Political Science, Faculty of Islamic Education and Political Science, Imam Sadegh (AS) Universityعلیهالسلام
Keywords: public interest, constitutional political jurisprudence, Sheikh Ismail Mahalati,
Abstract :
The concept of public expediency in the context of the history of Shia political thought and in different eras has been the focus of thinkers, including these jurists who have paid attention to the concept of expediency in the context of constitutional thought. The distinction between constitutionalism and monarchy knew that this important approach is at the threshold of the constitutionalism movement from the mothers of new political thought. The present study tries to show in what context Mahalati thought in the context of Mahalati's idea by using Skinner's interpretative approach while focusing on theept of public interest in the political thought of Mahalati? The hypothesis of his research states that the political thought of Mahalati is based on the defense of constitutionalism based on the observance of public interests, emphasizing on the constitutional government in accordance with rational arguments and the adaptation of religion in the age of occultation.
_||_