An Examination of Sayyied Ahmad Khomeini's Views and Ranjnameh based on critical discourse Analysis
Subject Areas : History of Political Thought in Iran
mansour Anbarmoo
1
(
phd in politics at SRBIAU
)
Fatemeh tabatabaie
2
(
Associate Professor, Department of Islamic Mysticism, Imam Khomeini and Islamic Revolution Research Institute
)
Keywords: ", Critical Discourse Analysis", ", Sayyid Ahmad Khomeini", Third Line", Ranjanameh", Norman Fairclough", ,
Abstract :
Seyyed Ahmad Mostafavi Khomeini (1946-1995) is the son of Imam Khomeini, as one of the important political activists before and after the Islamic Revolution. Although he is well known as one of the first-hand sources of contemporary political historiography due his presence and activity during the struggle and exile and Imam's leadership, in research,, his opinions and political life are rarely mentioned. Administration Imam's Beit (house) during the exile, struggles, and establishment of the Islamic revolution, developments related to the imposed war, issues related to the dismissal of the deputy leadership and the writing of the Ranjnameh are among the turning points of his life. The issue of this research is why Ahmad Khomeini wrote the Ranjnameh. In the present study, an attempt is made to explain the text of Ranjnameh as one of the most important political letters in the history of contemporary Iran, using the approach of analyzing the critical discourse of Norman Fairclough and the role of Ahmad in the developments of the first decade of the Islamic Revolution. Using this approach, the base is processed and checked in the index. The findings of the research show Ahmad Khomeini, considering the political and social situation of Iran in the 1980s and variables such as Imam Khomeini's illness and the changes in power relations in the 1960s, tried to create a new political and religious meaning in the field by compiling the manifesto. In line with political identification, the reproduction of the ideological beliefs of the Islamic Revolution, the consolidation and organization of the public consent for the selection of the new successor of the leadership and the persuasion of the public opinion.
_||_
