Linguistic Prototypes and Their Application in Real World Cognition

Subject Areas : Persian Language and Literature

Faegheh Shahhoseyni ¹

1 - M.A. in General Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba’i Univerisity

Received: 2011-02-01 Accepted : 2011-06-21 Published : 2011-08-23

Keywords:

Abstract :

The present study explores the notion of categorization and prototypes based on cognitive approaches. In cognitive semantics, language is not separated from mind and cognition.  A main objective of this study is to seek a comprehensive explanation for prototype and its importance in cognitive studies. Meanwhile, the researcher uses the prototype theory as an analytical tool. According to this theory, the prototype is the central example of the category and other members assigns their membership by means of a judgment of similarity to a central example. The results show that the language phenomena's depends on form and function. In other words, to analyze language we should consider both form and function. Although prototype is primarily a semantic concept, but in order to study language we must notice the structural implications too.

References:

        1-        صفوی، کوروش، (1379)، درآمدی بر معنی‌شناسی. تهران، سازمان تبلیغات اسلامی. پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی، ص: 450.

         2-         Croft, W. (1990). Typology and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p: 50-120.

         3-         Croft, W. and D.A. Cruse )2003). Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p: 77-78.

         4-         Evans, V. and M. Green )2006). Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press,p:255-545.

         5-         Givón, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar, Amesterdam: John Benjamins,p:12.

         6-         Geeraerts, D. )2006). Cognitive Linguistics. Basic Readings: Mountain de Gruyter,p:9-10.

         7-         Haspelmath, M.) 2002). Understanding Morphology. London: Arnold Publishers, p:79-80.

         8-         Haspelmath, M.) 2006). Against Markedness. Journal of Linguistics, Cambridge University Press,p:25.

         9-         Kövecses, Z (2006). Language, Mind, and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press,p:24-28.

       10-       Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol.I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press,p:14-17.

       11-       Langacker, R.W.  (2006). Dimensions of defocusing. In Voice and Grammatical Relations, Tsunoda, Tasaku and Taro Kageyama (eds.),p:32.

       12-       Lee, D. )2001). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press,p:53-54.

       13-       Saeed, J. I. (1997). Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell,p:37.

       14-       Taylor, J. (1995). Linguistic Categorization, Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press,p:40-197.

       15-       Wardhaugh, R. (1990). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. UK: Basil Blackwell,p:228.

       16-       Robinson. P. & C. N. Elise. (2008). Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and 2^nd Language Acquistion. UK: Taylor & Francis, Routledge,p:48-50.