A Comparative Study of the Levels of Resurrection from Seyed Heidar Amoli’s and Mir Seyed Ali Hamedani’s Point of View

Subject Areas : Islamic Mysticism

Sirus Morady ¹ , mohammad ibrahim maalmir ² , Esmaeil Mansury Larijany ³

1 - دانشجوی دکتری تصوف و عرفان اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق، الهیات و علوم سیاسی، واحدعلوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - Department of Persian Language and Literature, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.
3 - دانشیار گروه عرفان اسلامی، دانشکده الهیات، واحدعلوم و تحقیقات،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

Received: 2020-01-25 Accepted : 2020-04-16 Published : 2022-12-22

Keywords:

Abstract :

Resurrection and Ma’aad are among the basic and important issues of Islamic mysticism. In different eras, mystics have spoken in some way about the truth, its types, levels, and its quidity. Accordingly, this documentary study has comparatively studied the levels of resurrection from the perspective of Seyyed Haidar Amoli and Mirsid Ali Hamedani, two great Shia mystics - eighth century AH - and has concluded that Seyyed Heidar based on trinitarian epistemology And the principles of mystical ontology and anthropology have been considered, analyzed and studied the levels of resurrection and have been divided into two types and for each type, it has been drawn twelve times. Mir Seyed Ali first draws and explains the fourfold resurrection based on the square epistemology of the secrets of point and number four, then divides, analyzes and examines the three types of resurrection based on the trinity epistemology and inner esoteric man. Amoli has a theoretical approach but Seyyed Haidar Amoli, as a great theorist of Shiite mysticism in analyzing the levels of resurrection, has a theoretical approach but Hamedani as a Murshid (Master), has actually a practical and educational approach to the issue