A Comparative Study of the Obstacles to Performing the Same Obligation in Islamic Jurisprudence, Iranian and British Law

Subject Areas : فقه و مبانی حقوق

Mohammad Reza Ashtari ¹ , Hassan Pashazadeh ² , Salman Valizadeh ³

1 - Ph.D. Student, Law Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Law Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Law Department, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

Received: 2020-06-25 Accepted : 2020-09-12 Published : 2020-11-21

Keywords: Same Obligation for Damages, Contract Rescission, Iranian Law, Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh), British Law, damages,

Abstract :

The present study aims to compare the obstacles to performingthe same obligation, in Islamic jurisprudence, Iranian and British Law. The method used in the study is descriptive analysis and the results showed that in the case of breach of contract, instead of obligation that compels the obligor to perform the same obligation or impede performance of the obligation or claim for damages or other compensations, the obligee has the right to make a claim either for the fulfillment of the same obligation or compensation. As long as there is no obstacle, the obligor performs the same obligation, and the court considers the request of the obligee. However, if it is not possible to compel the obligor to perform the same obligation or due to some obstacles, the judicial process prolongs or costs increase, the court is obliged to follow up. The obligee is also entitled to rescind the contract and doom the obligor to pay penalty for breach of contract.

References:

انصاری، مرتضی (1375). مکاسب. به قلم طاهر خوشنویس. تبریز: اطلاعات، چاپ دوم.

بحرانی، یوسف (۱۴۰۹). الحدائق الناضره. بیروت: دارالاضواء، ج ۱۹.

شعبانی، قاسم (۱۳۸۵). تعیین خسارت در قراردادها و تعهدات. تهران: انتشارات اطلاعات.

شمس، عبدالله (۱۳۸4). آیین دادرسی مدنی. تهران: انتشارات دراگ، ج۱، چاپ دوم.

شهیدی، مهدی (۱۳۸۳). حقوق مدنی، اصول قراردادها و تعهدات. تهران: انتشارات مجد، ج۲، چاپ سوم.

شهیدی، مهدی (۱۳۸۶). حقوق مدنی، شروط ضمن عقد. تهران: انتشارات مجد، ج4.

کاتوزیان، ناصر (۱۳۸۲). حقوق مدنی، قواعد عمومی قراردادها. تهران: انتشارات به نشر، ج2.

نورانی مقدم، یونس (1374). مطالعه تطبیقی تخلف وصف در حقوق ایران و کنوانسیون بیع بین‌المللی. پایان‌نامه کارشناسی ارشد. تهران: دانشگاه تربیت مدرس.

Anderson, A. (1953). Frustration of Contract, A Rejected Doctrine. 3 DE PAUL L. REV. 1 (1953); Note, 6 DE PAUL L. REV. 289 (1957). 167.

Corbin, A. (1988). Corbin on Contracts. U.S.A: West Poblishing co, Vol .5.

Guest, A.G. (1977). Chitty on Contracts: General Principles. London: Maxwell, Vol.1.

Honnold, J. (1991). Law for International Sale sunder The ; 1980. Boston: United Nations Convention, 3^rd ed.

Lando, O. (2001). Salient Features of The Principles of European Contract Law. Boston: United Nations Convention, 3^rd ed.

Treitel, G.H. (1995). Remedies, International Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Anson: Law of Contract, 24^th ed, Vol. VII.

Treitel, G.H. (1999). The law of Contract. London: Maxwell, 10^th ed.