Analysis of the scope of responsibility for paying blood money from Treasury in Islamic jurisprudence
Subject Areas : فقه و مبانی حقوقAbbas Abedi 1 , Mohmmad mahdi Ahmadi 2
1 - PhD Student, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, Islamic Azad University, Qom Branch, Qom, Iran.
Keywords: murder, Human factor, Treasury, blood money, Islamic jurisprudence,
Abstract :
According to the principle of personal punishment, the offender must be responsible for the payment of blood money in the event of a crime. But this principle has some exceptions, one of which is the payment of blood money Treasury. The scope of liability of the bailiff in some cases, including in line crimes, is even known and available, but according to the law, the steward in the crime is not the guarantor of the payment of blood money and the bailiff is the guarantor in other crimes. In some cases, the offender has been held responsible for the payment of blood money, despite the lack of identification of Johnny and his inaccessibility, such as being killed as a result of disturbances and chaos. But in relation to social issues there are cases where, despite the entry of illegitimate damages, the responsibility for the payment of blood money and compensation is not borne by a specific person, and in the legal and legal texts it is not explicitly stated about them in such cases. Relying on principles of responsibility such as the jurisprudential rules of "the law of the infallible and the lawful" and "disaster", the responsibility to compensate for the dignity of human beings, to secure social justice, to promote public safety, and to support the restoration of their lives. He was in charge of Treasury and took steps in that direction.
قرآن کریم
_||_
