Re-reading of concept of right and wrong by scrutnizing the authority of convention
Subject Areas : فقه و مبانی حقوق
ابوالقاسم علیدوست
1
( استاد عضو هیئت علمی گروه فقه و حقوق اسلامی پژوهشکده نظام های اسلامی پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و اندیشه اسلامی،
قم، ایران)
mohammad jafari
2
(MSc. Student, Farabi Campus University of Tehran, Qom, Iran)
Keywords: convention, mistake, wrong, News, right,
Abstract :
Right and wrong are of convetional concepts, the criteria of which have been subject to many discusions on the side of faqihs and lexicologists and there have been some controversies in some cases. As a result, in many issues surrounding the concept and uncertain cases, this discrepancy in views has overflowed into the semantics and the recognition of religious canon. This study investigates this criterion relying on the discovery of meaning on the basis of convention and finally, of the views on the issue and based on Al-Jahiz’s view and adding complement, the authoritative view is codifies. The final purpose of this study is to find a right criterion to say right from wrong and in doing so help the researchers with telling right from wrong in doubtful cases like, equivocaton, standing on ceremony, joking, anecdoting, break of promise, etc.The consequence of this writing can be to provide a codified framework for precise conceptualization in the field of news sentences, which sometimes challenges imitator and even the priest. By explaining the six faces of the news sentences, this framework becomes clear.
_||_
